Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'dliketoknowwhatyouthink.
Yeah. LTE have potential to kill the WISP market in metro areas and in long term even in rural when they get around to deploy there. But looks like first serious LTE deployments might not happen until 2013 or so and my guess maybe by 16 or 17 we might see as narrow spread as we currently see on 3G availability today so basically only metro areas with at least a few hundred thousand of populations. Smaller areas might by then finally gotten 3G speeds. /Eje Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:53:28 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd liketoknowwhatyouthink. Okey ... 2nd time around ... Guys you gotta keep up with technology... Lte: Long Term Evolution, currently the technology of choice of cell carriers for 4G, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3GPP_Long_Term_Evolution Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:27 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd liketoknowwhatyouthink. OK, what's LTE? marlon - Original Message - From: Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:59 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like toknowwhatyouthink. It's a fair question and it bugs me too. Fact is, I was a more than a bit blind and thought I was more objective than I really was. Also, since then the economy and other conditions has conspired to kick e in the teeth a bit. I still believe it is great technology for nomadic and perhaps mobile, but it is damned near impossible to fight the LTE interests AND the current economy that is so weak no big guys are spending big CAPEX, giving LTE all the time it needs to catch technically (and it already dominates politically). That has me moving back to where I began -- wireless broadband is primarily a fixed business, with some added nomadicity in some cases. For that, d is the better standard, at least with my current hindsight. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of can...@believewireless.net Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:33 AM To: jefftho...@fastmail.fm; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. Patrick, can you clarify the e vs. d for me. The reason I ask is that I saw you do the Alvarion webinar and claimed that e was the only way to go. Now that you are with Aperto, d is the only way to go. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jeff Booher jefftho...@fastmail.fm wrote: Marlon, What are you talking about? Our product is very reliable, and we have many very happy customers ( including some very large ones such as towerstream ) - Jeff -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:00 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know whatyouthink. I have heard NOTHING good about their product's reliability. I have one consulting customer that's still using them, his failure rates are shocking. I'd have dumped them years ago. Unless this changes I'd stay far far away from Aperto. (I've been to the Ca. offices and like the people that run the show, but that doesn't help my customers at all.) marlon - Original Message - From: Pat O'Connor p...@inlandnet.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 2:29 PM Subject: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know what youthink. We're looking to deploy 3.65GHz this year in a couple of different locations because of interference issues. So far they have the most compelling price point. I'd like to know how well it works in the field. All opinions appreciated. Hit me off list if you want to.\ Thanks, Pat - - -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ - - -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ - - -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/
Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz?I'dliketoknowwhatyouthink.
a.. Peak download rates of 326.4 Mbit/s for 4x4 antennas, 172.8 Mbit/s for 2x2 antennas for every 20 MHz of spectrum. [2] a.. Peak upload rates of 86.4 Mbit/s for every 20 MHz of spectrum.[2] Anyone happen to know how wide the average cell phone band is? I'm thinking that this will be better for us than for them. BTW, did anyone else notice the 5 gig monthly limit in the fine print at the bottom of the last Sprint ad? marlon - Original Message - From: e...@wisp-router.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 6:02 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz?I'dliketoknowwhatyouthink. Yeah. LTE have potential to kill the WISP market in metro areas and in long term even in rural when they get around to deploy there. But looks like first serious LTE deployments might not happen until 2013 or so and my guess maybe by 16 or 17 we might see as narrow spread as we currently see on 3G availability today so basically only metro areas with at least a few hundred thousand of populations. Smaller areas might by then finally gotten 3G speeds. /Eje Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:53:28 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd liketoknowwhatyouthink. Okey ... 2nd time around ... Guys you gotta keep up with technology... Lte: Long Term Evolution, currently the technology of choice of cell carriers for 4G, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3GPP_Long_Term_Evolution Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:27 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd liketoknowwhatyouthink. OK, what's LTE? marlon - Original Message - From: Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:59 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like toknowwhatyouthink. It's a fair question and it bugs me too. Fact is, I was a more than a bit blind and thought I was more objective than I really was. Also, since then the economy and other conditions has conspired to kick e in the teeth a bit. I still believe it is great technology for nomadic and perhaps mobile, but it is damned near impossible to fight the LTE interests AND the current economy that is so weak no big guys are spending big CAPEX, giving LTE all the time it needs to catch technically (and it already dominates politically). That has me moving back to where I began -- wireless broadband is primarily a fixed business, with some added nomadicity in some cases. For that, d is the better standard, at least with my current hindsight. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of can...@believewireless.net Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:33 AM To: jefftho...@fastmail.fm; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. Patrick, can you clarify the e vs. d for me. The reason I ask is that I saw you do the Alvarion webinar and claimed that e was the only way to go. Now that you are with Aperto, d is the only way to go. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jeff Booher jefftho...@fastmail.fm wrote: Marlon, What are you talking about? Our product is very reliable, and we have many very happy customers ( including some very large ones such as towerstream ) - Jeff -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:00 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know whatyouthink. I have heard NOTHING good about their product's reliability. I have one consulting customer that's still using them, his failure rates are shocking. I'd have dumped them years ago. Unless this changes I'd stay far far away from Aperto. (I've been to the Ca. offices and like the people that run the show, but that doesn't help my customers at all.) marlon - Original Message - From: Pat O'Connor p...@inlandnet.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 2:29 PM Subject: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know what youthink. We're looking to deploy 3.65GHz this year in a couple of different locations because of interference issues. So far they have the most compelling price point. I'd like to know how well it works
Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'dliketoknowwhatyouthink.
Long Term Engineering? Scottie -- Original Message -- From: Eric Albert eric.alb...@alvarion.com Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:48:11 -0800 LTE = Late to Evolve. Eric Albert | Application Engineer Alvarion Inc. | -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 5:27 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd liketoknowwhatyouthink. OK, what's LTE? marlon - Original Message - From: Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:59 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like toknowwhatyouthink. It's a fair question and it bugs me too. Fact is, I was a more than a bit blind and thought I was more objective than I really was. Also, since then the economy and other conditions has conspired to kick e in the teeth a bit. I still believe it is great technology for nomadic and perhaps mobile, but it is damned near impossible to fight the LTE interests AND the current economy that is so weak no big guys are spending big CAPEX, giving LTE all the time it needs to catch technically (and it already dominates politically). That has me moving back to where I began -- wireless broadband is primarily a fixed business, with some added nomadicity in some cases. For that, d is the better standard, at least with my current hindsight. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of can...@believewireless.net Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:33 AM To: jefftho...@fastmail.fm; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. Patrick, can you clarify the e vs. d for me. The reason I ask is that I saw you do the Alvarion webinar and claimed that e was the only way to go. Now that you are with Aperto, d is the only way to go. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jeff Booher jefftho...@fastmail.fm wrote: Marlon, What are you talking about? Our product is very reliable, and we have many very happy customers ( including some very large ones such as towerstream ) - Jeff -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:00 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know whatyouthink. I have heard NOTHING good about their product's reliability. I have one consulting customer that's still using them, his failure rates are shocking. I'd have dumped them years ago. Unless this changes I'd stay far far away from Aperto. (I've been to the Ca. offices and like the people that run the show, but that doesn't help my customers at all.) marlon - Original Message - From: Pat O'Connor p...@inlandnet.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 2:29 PM Subject: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know what youthink. We're looking to deploy 3.65GHz this year in a couple of different locations because of interference issues. So far they have the most compelling price point. I'd like to know how well it works in the field. All opinions appreciated. Hit me off list if you want to.\ Thanks, Pat - - -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ - - -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/
