Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-14 Thread Dan Petermann
For the profile, I use RadioMobile and export the path to a text file. I then put the first 2 columns into the second tab on the spreadsheet. Works great. On Nov 13, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Dylan Oliver wrote: Paul, I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the Link

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Hendry
leaves grew. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Petermann Sent: 14 November 2005 15:53 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 For the profile, I use RadioMobile and export the path to a text file. I then put

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-14 Thread Rick Harnish
260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:08 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Just as a rough guide

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Hendry
Will do. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Harnish Sent: 15 November 2005 02:13 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul, Send me the coordinates of the link and pictures from antenna height

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-13 Thread Paul Hendry
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of G.Villarini Sent: 11 October 2005 02:38 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 They only thing I haven't opened yet is my set of Orthogon Spectras ... too expensive .. Gino A. Villarini, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-13 Thread Dylan Oliver
Paul, I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the Link Estimator. Are you familiar with this tool? You may have to attend a training session to get access to the partner site and profile generator. However I'd be happy to generate a path report for you .. the tool is quite

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-13 Thread Paul Hendry
:04 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul, I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the Link Estimator. Are you familiar with this tool? You may have to attend a training session to get access to the partner site and profile

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-13 Thread Rick Harnish
PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 4:46 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 What about NLOS (trees and buildings) @ 3km with a max EIRP of 33db (as thats

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-11-13 Thread G.Villarini
, November 13, 2005 4:35 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Hey Gino, Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking to get a pair for a link but a bit

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread Paul Hendry
To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 UPDATE Just tested with 2 P4's at each end of a StarVX link running on the 2 port WAR (266Mhz CPU). Bi-direction test using TCP, random data (uncompressible) shows 35-36mbps in both directions (aggregate throughput of 70-72mbps

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread Scott Reed
' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:10:44 +0100 Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 UPDATE Just tested with 2 P4's at each end of a StarVX link running on the 2 port WAR (266Mhz CPU). Bi-direction test using TCP, random data (uncompressible) shows 35

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread danlist
Paul, Was this turbo mode or standard? Thanks Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 UPDATE Just

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread David E. Smith
Paul Hendry wrote: If your asymmetric performance with the RB532's is between 12 and 18mbps I wouldn't say your seeing similar performance as I am seeing 40mbps and 27.7mbps when transmitting and receiving at the same time using random (uncompressible) tcp based data. I just meant similar as

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-20 Thread Paul Hendry
:29 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul, Was this turbo mode or standard? Thanks Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'WISPA General

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-19 Thread Paul Hendry
] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 13 October 2005 21:08 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Just a little update. We thought we'd see what we could get through a couple of these 2 port WAR boards in ideal conditions (rssi -25) with turbo enabled. Testing

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-19 Thread David E. Smith
Paul Hendry wrote: Managed to scavenge a P4 system together for testing purposes. Hey, as long as you're doubling as my personal IT lab... :) My tests so far have just been traditional AP/client mode, and I'm seeing the same sort of asymmetrical performance you are. With a pair of RB532s,

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-13 Thread Paul Hendry
vs RB532 Indeed. And finding a clear 5 or 10Mhz is a lot easier than finding a clear 20Mhz. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Sent: 11 October 2005 15:56 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-11 Thread Paul Hendry
Of Tom DeReggi Sent: 10 October 2005 23:59 To: Lonnie Nunweiler; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Oops... I'm using 5.3G with 19 dbi antenna, estimating 2 db in cable loss, to meet legal 30db limit. At a half mile, we calculated it to be -54db, and at 1/4 mile

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-11 Thread George
Paul Hendry wrote: as we have no intention of using them at 20 or 40Mhz. This to me is the beauty of the WAR StarVX platform. The links I have up now are 10MHz. With limited spectrum available to us, it's the frugal thing to do. George -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

[WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread Tom DeReggi
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about 300 yards away LOS, with only a single client so far on AP to SU mode. The radios associated at 54 mbps, and about -70 db, with a quality of 24/29. All speed enhancement features enable, and encryption turned off. Using

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread G.Villarini
General List Subject: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about 300 yards away LOS, with only a single client so far on AP to SU mode. The radios associated at 54 mbps, and about -70 db, with a quality of 24/29. All speed enhancement

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread Lonnie Nunweiler
300 yards with LOS with a signal of -70 dB? That sure seems low. You either have another system real close or you have severe trouble with antenna or cabling. A Superpass 21 dB at that range would give you -40 dB or better signals, assuming proper cabling. Did you set the distance to a couple

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread George
The wraps have a limitation, maybe the client does as well. Turn on the advanced features and it will go more speed. Buy WAR boads and StarVX and go TWICE as fast or use HALF the channel space. George Tom DeReggi wrote: I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread Matt Liotta
Sounds like you just want an external antenna jack on the Access5830. If so, you might consider doing something similar to what the LastMileGear guys do with the Canopy 5.7 gear. -Matt Tom DeReggi wrote: I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about 300 yards away

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread G.Villarini
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:14 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Sounds like you just want an external antenna jack on the Access5830. If so, you might consider doing something similar to what the LastMileGear guys do with the Canopy 5.7 gear. -Matt

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread Matt Liotta
, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.aeronetpr.com 787.767.7466 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:14 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Sounds

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread David E. Smith
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about 300 yards away LOS, with only a single client so far on AP to SU mode. The radios associated at 54 mbps, and about -70 db, with a quality of 24/29. All speed enhancement features enable, and encryption turned off. Using

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread Tom DeReggi
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 300 yards with LOS with a signal of -70 dB? That sure seems low. You either have another system real close or you have severe trouble with antenna or cabling. A Superpass 21 dB at that range would give you -40 dB or better signals, assuming proper

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread Tom DeReggi
Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:14 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Sounds like you just want an external antenna jack on the Access5830. If so, you might consider doing something similar to what the LastMileGear

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread Lonnie Nunweiler
Our test uses large packets and TCP. The problem is that the bandwidth tester consumes a lot of the CPU, so the solution is to test between machines on the edges, and thus get the true throughput without the limitations of CPU speed. Lots of guys have used desktop machines and found that the

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread George
Ahhh you've never cracked one open to see what's inside? Ask Gino, you have to take everything apart and see what makes it tick. :) George Matt Liotta wrote: That's good to know if for no other reason than to use better coax jumpers. It is really annoying that Trango uses RP-SMA connectors

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread George
Anyone picked up one of Valemount's new WAR boards and their modified StarOS distribution for them (StarVX)? David Smith MVN.net Yeppers, I have a couple of PtP links using the WAR StarVX. Using cloaking, 5 and 10MHz channel spacing in 5 gig.

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

2005-10-10 Thread David E. Smith
George wrote: Anyone picked up one of Valemount's new WAR boards and their modified StarOS distribution for them (StarVX)? Yeppers, I have a couple of PtP links using the WAR StarVX. Using cloaking, 5 and 10MHz channel spacing in 5 gig.