Re: [WISPA] BGP Question

2009-06-12 Thread Brad Belton
arini Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:09 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] BGP Question IS there any way to verify on a Router the Advertisements received from a peer? in Mikrotik? Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143

[WISPA] BGP Question

2009-06-12 Thread Gino Villarini
IS there any way to verify on a Router the Advertisements received from a peer? in Mikrotik? Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 W

Re: [WISPA] BGP Question

2007-02-08 Thread Matt Liotta
Jeff Broadwick wrote: "AS prepending is fairly effective method. Assuming you have more then just a /24 network, you also can use selective advertising of more specific prefixes through a preferred provider to influence inbound traffic." AS prepending is not as effective as it used to be. I

RE: [WISPA] BGP Question

2007-02-08 Thread Jeff Broadwick
PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] BGP Question Prepending is not an effective way of forcing other providers to send their traffic through your preferred upstream. In fact, there is no good way to do it at all. It is far better to just have quality upstreams. -Matt Don Annas wrote: >

Re: [WISPA] BGP Question

2007-02-07 Thread Butch Evans
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Don Annas wrote: When peering with multiple providers, is it a requirement that you pick a primary to send and receive traffic or can you not prepend AS hops and allow traffic to arrive to you via the 'best' BGP route. There is no way to "insure" that traffic will come ba

Re: [WISPA] BGP Question

2007-02-07 Thread Matt Liotta
Don Annas wrote: Well, our upstream providers are Level 3 and Time Warner Telecom. Both are good providers however, it is important that our traffic doesn't enter one provider and leave another since we provide VoIP services. I was looking for the 'best' way to achieve this. There is no way

RE: [WISPA] BGP Question

2007-02-07 Thread Don Annas
riginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:23 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] BGP Question Prepending is not an effective way of forcing other providers to send their traffic through your preferred up

Re: [WISPA] BGP Question

2007-02-07 Thread Matt Liotta
Prepending is not an effective way of forcing other providers to send their traffic through your preferred upstream. In fact, there is no good way to do it at all. It is far better to just have quality upstreams. -Matt Don Annas wrote: When peering with multiple providers, is it a requirement

[WISPA] BGP Question

2007-02-07 Thread Don Annas
When peering with multiple providers, is it a requirement that you pick a primary to send and receive traffic or can you not prepend AS hops and allow traffic to arrive to you via the 'best' BGP route. As a VoIP provider, it is important that traffic enter and leave via the same provider. We curr