Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-05 Thread Jeff Broadwick
CRA was started under Carter and greatly expanded under Clinton. This is a far more detailed conversation then we can have here, but the fact is that if the government (Fan and Fred) hadn't created the market for the paper, this could not have happened. Regards, Jeff Jeff Broadwick

Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-05 Thread Matt Liotta
That is factual incorrect. Only minor changes were made to CRA under Clinton. It was the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act also under Clinton that required Fannie and Freddie to securitize a certain percentage of CRA mortgages. Again, only a fraction of the bad

Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-05 Thread Brad Belton
The underlying point still holds true; big government imposing rules on lenders forcing them to lend to those that wouldn't have normally qualified. The cash for clunkers will probably have the same results. People getting a new car payment they probably wouldn't have qualified for without big

Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-05 Thread Matt Liotta
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Brad Belton wrote: The underlying point still holds true; big government imposing rules on lenders forcing them to lend to those that wouldn't have normally qualified. No, it in fact does not hold true. Since CRA mortgages were only a fraction of the bad