Exclusivity is an old issue and was already to supposed to be banned.
Exclusive marketing agreements was fine. Even exclusive frequency was OK, as
you can't can;t sell it twice, or fit 2 gallons of water in a 1 gallon
bucket. But NOT exclusive provider.
Any contract writer knew Exclusive Provider had to be excluded from their
agreements, or they risked it invalidating the agreement.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Council rejects wireless proposal - exclusive
Are Exclusive MDU Access Agreements on Thin Regulatory Ice?
</2006issues/nov06issues/kandutsch_nov.pdf>
/By Carl E. Kandutsch, Ph.D., J.D/
Good arguments can be made for and against exclusive, perpetual access.
Will the use of exclusive access agreements between owners of
multi-dwelling unit (MDU) properties and communications providers be
banned or restricted in the foreseeable future?
http://www.broadbandproperties.com/2006issues/nov06issues/kandutsch_nov.pdf
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
