Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Tom DeReggi
sage - From: "Kosinet Wireless" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:26 AM Subject: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link > I'm looking for ideas / recommendations. I've got a Client with 2 > buildings about 600 feet apart. Currently using Cat5

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Josh Luthman
KIT > > > > 600 feet is well within the range for full modulation. > > > > Jerry > > > > -Original Message- > > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Kosinet Wireless > > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 20

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
On > Behalf Of Kosinet Wireless > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:27 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link > > I'm looking for ideas / recommendations. I've got a Client with 2 buildings > about 600 feet apart. Currently using C

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Jerry Richardson
59 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link Jerry Richardson wrote: > Wireless is nice but since there is already a Cat5 in place I would use a > pair of Ethernet extenders. > > 396.00 for 100M FDX: http://netsys-direct.com/proddetail.php?prod=NV-600EKIT >

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Kosinet Wireless
That might just do the job. I'll check i out. Thanks. - Original Message - From: "Jerry Richardson" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:51 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link > Wireless is nice but since there is alr

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Dennis Burgess
et Clark Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:59 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link Jerry Richardson wrote: > Wireless is nice but since there is already a Cat5 in place I would use a pair of Ethernet extenders. > > 396.00 for 100M FDX: http://netsys-

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Bret Clark
Jerry Richardson wrote: > Wireless is nice but since there is already a Cat5 in place I would use a > pair of Ethernet extenders. > > 396.00 for 100M FDX: http://netsys-direct.com/proddetail.php?prod=NV-600EKIT > > 600 feet is well within the range for full modulation. > > Jerry > Liking that

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Jerry Richardson
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Kosinet Wireless Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:27 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link I'm looking for ideas / recommendations. I've got a Client with 2 buildings about 600 feet apart. Currently

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Jeromie Reeves
Nano bridges, rockets. Why not fire up VDSL2+ modems back to back on the existing copper. about $500 and 100mbit. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Kosinet Wireless wrote: > I'm looking for ideas / recommendations. I've got a Client with 2 buildings > about 600 feet apart. Currently using Cat5

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Josh Luthman
Why not two 5Ghz radios? Ubnt or MT would be <500 and prove 20 megs I'd bet. More if you MIMO or use 40Mhz channels. On 3/17/10, Kosinet Wireless wrote: > I'm looking for ideas / recommendations. I've got a Client with 2 buildings > about 600 feet apart. Currently using Cat5 locked at 10Mbps -

[WISPA] High Speed Bridge Link

2010-03-17 Thread Kosinet Wireless
I'm looking for ideas / recommendations. I've got a Client with 2 buildings about 600 feet apart. Currently using Cat5 locked at 10Mbps - It's been working ok, but we need more speed. Fiber is probably the best bang for the buck, but I was wondering if there was anything wireless out there that