Will bonding interfaces of 2 Rocket M5 Dish units result in full duplex
transmission? We are needing to increase the backhaul throughput of one
of our links. The obvious answer is to convert to a licensed full
duplex unit (which we plan to do) but in the meantime to get by will
bonding
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] MT interface bonding
Will bonding interfaces of 2 Rocket M5 Dish units result in full duplex
transmission? We are needing to increase the backhaul throughput of one of our
links. The obvious answer is to convert to a licensed full duplex unit (which
we
No. You will need to set one up as tx and one as rx. Bonding just
uses them both for tx/rx. The best way that I know to do this is with
OSPF and Mikrotik. That way one link is always tx and the other is
rx.
http://stfunoo.be/?p=696
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100
...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT interface bonding
No. You will need to set one up as tx and one as rx. Bonding just
uses them both for tx/rx. The best way that I know to do this is with
OSPF and Mikrotik
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT interface bonding
No. You will need to set one up as tx and one as rx. Bonding just
uses them both for tx/rx. The best way that I know to do this is with
OSPF and Mikrotik. That way one link is always tx and the other is
rx.
http://stfunoo.be/?p=696
Josh Luthman
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:44 -0600, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
As far as performance is concerned which will offer the better
end result? Bonding or routing the interfaces? Can you elaborate
on how to use ospf to create dedicated tx / rx interfaces? We use
ospf currently to facilitate a
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT interface bonding
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:44 -0600, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
As far as performance is concerned which will offer the better
end result? Bonding or routing the interfaces? Can you elaborate
on how to use ospf to create dedicated tx / rx interfaces? We
is unauthorized and may be illegal.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 10:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT interface bonding
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:44 -0600
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 12:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT interface bonding
Thats the radio duplex to blame.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 12:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT interface bonding
Thats the radio duplex to blame.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 14, 2011 1:17 PM, Patrick
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 12:17 -0600, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
Which would give the better experience?
It depends on what you need. If more it's just more throughput, then
either will likely give you what you need. Both can give you failover
capability. OSPF will act more like FDX, though it
11 matches
Mail list logo
