Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-10 Thread Mike Hammett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 12:21 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS That is cool Travis - Thanks for that info. I have been tip Toeing around V3.x since it came out and have avoided downloading it to even try it out. This last

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Travis Johnson
hursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets get real and everyone use real figures. I ain't talking bench t

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Jeromie Reeves
541-998- 541-998-5599 fax http://www.unwiredwest.com - Original Message - From: Mac Dearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Jeromie Reeves
: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets get real and everyone use real figures. I ain't talking bench test

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Mac Dearman
: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Hi, 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 5mhz channel, 7.8Mbps one direction 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 40mhz channel, 52.3Mbps one direction All these tests are with Nstreme on, but no framer policy. I know people have squeezed more by playing with the framer settings, but we have never needed

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Travis Johnson
al Message - From: "Mac Dearman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'WISPA General List'" wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both sides running Nstream2

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Travis Johnson
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 10:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Hi, 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 5mhz channel, 7.8Mbps one direction 5.3ghz, 3 miles, 40mhz channel, 52.3Mbps one direction All

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Mac Dearman
General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Mac, I have been running in production links and GigE routers since 3.0rc13. Our main edge router is MT v3.1 right now and is running perfectly. I have upgraded about 10 of our RB532's with v3.2 and it has been perfect so far. Some of the new

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Jeromie Reeves
General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets get real and everyone use real

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-09 Thread Travis Johnson
- From: "Mac Dearman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'WISPA General List'" wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both sides running Nstream2. If we ar

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-08 Thread Mike Hammett
- From: Matt Larsen - Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:31 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS OK, here are some real world examples: 5.3ghz 40mhz channel, 8.5 miles. WAR4/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless Antennas

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-08 Thread Mike Hammett
:45 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Mike Hammett wrote: I believe MT v3 has a new wireless driver that is better. Hmmm, A statement like that must mean that you have quite abit real world experience to back this up. Do you have lots of MT and Star units in the wild for considerable

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-08 Thread George Rogato
Mike Hammett wrote: I believe MT v3 has a new wireless driver that is better. Hmmm, A statement like that must mean that you have quite abit real world experience to back this up. Do you have lots of MT and Star units in the wild for considerable legnths of time? When giving advice, you

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-08 Thread Tom DeReggi
- Original Message - From: Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:43 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I'm not trying to make things more complicated, but the tool used to test is also very important. For example

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-08 Thread Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom DeReggi Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I'll second that by adding, not only have consistent testing tools for testing each product

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-08 Thread Mike Hammett
' Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets get real and everyone use real figures. I ain't talking bench test and maybe if I hold one hand in the air, twist my

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-08 Thread Travis Johnson
-5599 fax http://www.unwiredwest.com - Original Message - From: "Mac Dearman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'WISPA General List'" wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those resu

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-08 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets get real and everyone use real figures. I

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-07 Thread Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc
Hammett Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:46 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Mikrotik can do 70 megs or more over 40 MHz as well. -- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Mark Nash [EMAIL

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-07 Thread Mike Hammett
Message - From: Wallace L. Walcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS We have a mixed Network of MT and Star-OS. Last summer, we did a detailed, in-office analysis of throughput between

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-07 Thread Mike Hammett
: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I think it's alot easier to deal with Mikrotik as a router wireless AP, due to the interface and ease of configuration. IP addresses, IP routes, bridging, DHCP, DHCP relay...many many things are very easy to configure in the Mikrotik interface. That said...the hardware

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-07 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS 50 both ways with N-Stream dual and Turbo mode... Dennis M. Burgess Mikrotik Certified Consultant Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri --WISP/Network Support Services-- +1 314-686-1302 -Original Message

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-07 Thread Mark Nash
UnwiredWest 78 Centennial Loop Suite E Eugene, OR 97401 541-998- 541-998-5599 fax http://www.unwiredwest.com - Original Message - From: Mac Dearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I haven't

[WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, Anyone care to help compare a Mikrotik based bridged AP/CPE solution to StarOS? Here is a quick list I have come up with. I would love to have everyone add their thoughts... Mikrotik features: graphical user interface (Winbox) more features (Torch, etc) more hardware choices (RB532,

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread Wallace L. Walcher
it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Hi, Anyone care to help compare a Mikrotik based bridged AP/CPE solution

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread Mac Dearman
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Hi, Anyone care to help compare a Mikrotik based bridged AP/CPE solution to StarOS? Here is a quick list I have come up

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread Mike Hammett
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:55 PM Subject: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Hi, Anyone care to help compare a Mikrotik based bridged AP/CPE solution to StarOS? Here is a quick list I have come up with. I would love to have

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wallace L. Walcher Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:19 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS We have a mixed Network of MT and Star-OS. Last summer, we

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread N W (Tele-NET)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Hi, Anyone care to help compare a Mikrotik based bridged AP/CPE solution to StarOS? Here is a quick list I

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wallace L. Walcher Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:19 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS We have a mixed Network of MT and Star-OS. Last summer, we did a detailed, in-office analysis of throughput

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread George Rogato
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Hi, Anyone care to help compare a Mikrotik based bridged AP/CPE solution to StarOS? Here is a quick list I have come up with. I would

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread Mark Nash
: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS I won't hold you to it mac. As long as your running the latest V3 Star-os on all the radios involved bridging works perfectly. I have a mostly all routed network, but I do have a 4 bridged PtP shots that work just fine. They are the first hops out of my noc to my

Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS

2008-02-06 Thread Tom DeReggi
console. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:55 PM Subject: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS Hi, Anyone