Folks,
 
http://wireless.fcc.gov/siting/otard.html
 
I just heard about a local Virginia WISP who used the OTARD rule to site a
tower.  
 
Has anyone else used this ruling to apply to Wireless Broadband where a
tower is placed on a property owner's land and then service offered to the
property owner on a secondary basis?
 
I see various writeups on the topic on the 'net, but can't find one that
specifically differentiates between the siting of an "antenna" versus a
"tower" with and antenna on it.
 
Kelly Shaw
Pure Internet, Inc.
www.pure.net
 
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to