Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-04-05 Thread Shaun Hoggan
Blair,
I can help you with any Gmail questions you have.  Give me a call anytime.

Shaun Hoggan
s...@ikano.commailto:s...@ikano.com
801-415-8113




From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Blair Davis
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

We really would like to find someone who could do the Google move and give us 
that .35 pricing as well

On 3/29/2011 10:56 AM, Mark Nash wrote:
Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this $.35 per account 
price you're getting?  I haven't been able to track anyone down about it.

Thanks.

Mark

On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go away.  
No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues, no more 
hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email server more 
often than a web server).  No more people getting their password hacked and 
thousands of emails being sent out.  No more IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al 
databases.  I tracked email maintenance time and materials for 6 months, and it 
was well worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let Google do it.

It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al and 
select Google as their email provider and put in their login information.

Regards,
Chuck

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
fai...@snappydsl.netmailto:fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
You can slice it any way you like...

all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly  how much time 
is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you have to pay for the service...

for example.
Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure is a very 
inexpensive proposition.
Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering 
services is a very inexpensive proposition..

paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of storage and 
spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...

Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have 'outsourced' 
security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a different third party 
for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...

our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with email 
even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but  we needed 
options which they don't offer.

Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...

Your Mileage May Vary.


Regards



Faisal Imtiaz

Snappy Internet  Telecom



On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus their 
profit.


-

Mike Hammett

Intelligent Computing Solutions

http://www.ics-il.com



On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, whether you 
outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would be well worth 
$0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.

Cameron
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt 
lm7...@gmail.commailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
 Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?  We
 also offer hosting services that need email.
To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
thousands.

 I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server. Personally,
 I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or other
 hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated and
 blocking spam effectively are much more costly.

 Regards,

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford 
 mogoo...@gmx.commailto:mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

 http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

 There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
 that you requested.

 Frank

 On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book module in
 webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-04-05 Thread Josh
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server 
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating 
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of 
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on 
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book module in 
 webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414


[snip]

iRedMail (www.iredmail.org)
Built using standard opensource packages like Spamassassin, Amavisd,
ClamAV, Roundcube, etc. Not heavily modified so you can easily update
the system using your package manager (I use CentOS, thus yum) without
borking anything. Full disclosure, I'm only using this on a couple of
personal domains, nothing business oriented, for the past two years or
so. But I don't see why you cannot run it with little issues. There
are a bunch of case studies on their site discussing users switching
from whatever mail system to iRedmail.

My only negative opinion was the author's decision to stop supporting
Squirrelmail. I prefer Squirrelmail over Roundcube (loads faster). But
I can live.

Josh



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Cameron Kilton
We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost $2,600/month 
or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.


Thanks,
Cameron Kilton
Project Manager
Midcoast Internet Solutions
http://www.midcoast.com
c...@midcoast.com
(207) 594-8277 x 108

On 3/29/2011 11:55 AM, Shaun Hoggan wrote:
 This is a great dialog on the pros and cons of hosting vs. outsourcing
 email. While the answer is not going to be the same for everyone,
 outsourcing our mail to Google has improved our customer experience many
 fold and has further entrenched our customers to us as their ISP.

 IKANO determined several years ago that we could not compete with the
 Google Gmail. The adage goes, “if you cannot beat them join them.” IKANO
 ended up moving our mail to Gmail and it has been one of the single best
 decisions we have made as a service provider.

 You can find out more about how IKANO is enabling service providers to
 move to Gmail here:

 http://partneredition.ikano.com/

 Shaun Hoggan

 s...@ikano.com mailto:s...@ikano.com

 801-415-8113

 *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 *On Behalf Of *Mark Nash
 *Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:57 AM
 *To:* WISPA General List
 *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

 Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this $.35 per
 account price you're getting? I haven't been able to track anyone down
 about it.

 Thanks.

 Mark

 On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:

 All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go
 away. No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail
 issues, no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail
 in an email server more often than a web server). No more people getting
 their password hacked and thousands of emails being sent out. No more
 IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al databases. I tracked email maintenance
 time and materials for 6 months, and it was well worth the $.35 per
 email account we spent to let Google do it.

 It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al
 and select Google as their email provider and put in their login
 information.


 Regards,
 Chuck

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
 mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:

 You can slice it any way you like...

 all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly how much
 time is spent by yourself or someone vs how much you have to pay for the
 service...

 for example.
 Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate and secure is a
 very inexpensive proposition.
 Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering
 services is a very inexpensive proposition..

 paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of
 storage and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...

 Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
 e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have
 'outsourced' security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a
 different third party for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...

 our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with
 email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but
 we needed options which they don't offer.

 Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...

 Your Mileage May Vary.

 Regards



 Faisal Imtiaz

 Snappy Internet  Telecom




 On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus
 their profit.

 -

 Mike Hammett

 Intelligent Computing Solutions

 http://www.ics-il.com




 On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:

 It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc,
 whether you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would
 be well worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com
 mailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

   Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google
 platform? We
   also offer hosting services that need email.

 To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
 and POP3 server settings. Yuk. Also, depending how many email
 accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
 thousands.


   I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
 Personally,
   I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google
 or other
   hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated and
   blocking spam effectively are much more costly.
  
   Regards,
  
   Cameron
  
   On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com
 mailto:mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:
  
   http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp
  
   There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
   that you requested.
  
   Frank
  
   On 3/28/2011 12:53

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Josh Luthman
What is your current cost for those 7400 email boxes?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com wrote:

 We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost $2,600/month
 or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.


 Thanks,
 Cameron Kilton
 Project Manager
 Midcoast Internet Solutions
 http://www.midcoast.com
 c...@midcoast.com
 (207) 594-8277 x 108

 On 3/29/2011 11:55 AM, Shaun Hoggan wrote:
  This is a great dialog on the pros and cons of hosting vs. outsourcing
  email. While the answer is not going to be the same for everyone,
  outsourcing our mail to Google has improved our customer experience many
  fold and has further entrenched our customers to us as their ISP.
 
  IKANO determined several years ago that we could not compete with the
  Google Gmail. The adage goes, “if you cannot beat them join them.” IKANO
  ended up moving our mail to Gmail and it has been one of the single best
  decisions we have made as a service provider.
 
  You can find out more about how IKANO is enabling service providers to
  move to Gmail here:
 
  http://partneredition.ikano.com/
 
  Shaun Hoggan
 
  s...@ikano.com mailto:s...@ikano.com
 
  801-415-8113
 
  *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
  *On Behalf Of *Mark Nash
  *Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:57 AM
  *To:* WISPA General List
  *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform
 
  Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this $.35 per
  account price you're getting? I haven't been able to track anyone down
  about it.
 
  Thanks.
 
  Mark
 
  On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
 
  All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go
  away. No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail
  issues, no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail
  in an email server more often than a web server). No more people getting
  their password hacked and thousands of emails being sent out. No more
  IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al databases. I tracked email maintenance
  time and materials for 6 months, and it was well worth the $.35 per
  email account we spent to let Google do it.
 
  It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al
  and select Google as their email provider and put in their login
  information.
 
 
  Regards,
  Chuck
 
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
  mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
 
  You can slice it any way you like...
 
  all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly how much
  time is spent by yourself or someone vs how much you have to pay for the
  service...
 
  for example.
  Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate and secure is a
  very inexpensive proposition.
  Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering
  services is a very inexpensive proposition..
 
  paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of
  storage and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...
 
  Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
  e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have
  'outsourced' security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a
  different third party for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...
 
  our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with
  email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but
  we needed options which they don't offer.
 
  Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...
 
  Your Mileage May Vary.
 
  Regards
 
 
 
  Faisal Imtiaz
 
  Snappy Internet  Telecom
 
 
 
 
  On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 
  Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus
  their profit.
 
  -
 
  Mike Hammett
 
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
 
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 
  On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
 
  It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc,
  whether you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would
  be well worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for
 others.
 
  Cameron
 
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com
  mailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
 
Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google
  platform? We
also offer hosting services that need email.
 
  To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
  and POP3 server settings. Yuk. Also, depending how many email
  accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
  thousands.
 
 
I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
  Personally,
I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google
  or other
hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Cameron Kilton
We have 4 cluster servers doing all the work and I'll say that are a (on 
a high side) $1,000 a piece for hardware. Probably about combined total 
of: 30 hours worth of config time for Spam and Virus protection.

Sit back and relax.

I like the idea of have google because of it's feature rich system, but 
that's a lot of money, I'd rather reinvest into more Wireless sites or 
into FTTx systems.


Thanks,
Cameron Kilton
Project Manager
Midcoast Internet Solutions
http://www.midcoast.com
c...@midcoast.com
(207) 594-8277 x 108

On 3/30/2011 2:00 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 What is your current cost for those 7400 email boxes?

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373


 On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com
 mailto:c...@midcoast.com wrote:

 We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost $2,600/month
 or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.


 Thanks,
 Cameron Kilton
 Project Manager
 Midcoast Internet Solutions
 http://www.midcoast.com
 c...@midcoast.com mailto:c...@midcoast.com
 (207) 594-8277 x 108

 On 3/29/2011 11:55 AM, Shaun Hoggan wrote:
   This is a great dialog on the pros and cons of hosting vs.
 outsourcing
   email. While the answer is not going to be the same for everyone,
   outsourcing our mail to Google has improved our customer
 experience many
   fold and has further entrenched our customers to us as their ISP.
  
   IKANO determined several years ago that we could not compete with the
   Google Gmail. The adage goes, “if you cannot beat them join
 them.” IKANO
   ended up moving our mail to Gmail and it has been one of the
 single best
   decisions we have made as a service provider.
  
   You can find out more about how IKANO is enabling service
 providers to
   move to Gmail here:
  
   http://partneredition.ikano.com/
  
   Shaun Hoggan
  
   s...@ikano.com mailto:s...@ikano.com mailto:s...@ikano.com
 mailto:s...@ikano.com
  
   801-415-8113
  
   *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
   *On Behalf Of *Mark Nash
   *Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:57 AM
   *To:* WISPA General List
   *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform
  
   Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this
 $.35 per
   account price you're getting? I haven't been able to track anyone
 down
   about it.
  
   Thanks.
  
   Mark
  
   On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
  
   All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email
 headaches go
   away. No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail
   issues, no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to
 fail
   in an email server more often than a web server). No more people
 getting
   their password hacked and thousands of emails being sent out. No more
   IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al databases. I tracked email
 maintenance
   time and materials for 6 months, and it was well worth the $.35 per
   email account we spent to let Google do it.
  
   It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al
   and select Google as their email provider and put in their login
   information.
  
  
   Regards,
   Chuck
  
   On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz
 fai...@snappydsl.net mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net
   mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
  
   You can slice it any way you like...
  
   all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly
 how much
   time is spent by yourself or someone vs how much you have to pay
 for the
   service...
  
   for example.
   Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate and secure is a
   very inexpensive proposition.
   Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus
 filtering
   services is a very inexpensive proposition..
  
   paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of
   storage and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...
  
   Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
   e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have
   'outsourced' security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a
   different third party for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...
  
   our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with
   email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great
 deal.. but
   we needed options which they don't offer.
  
   Maybe next go around we

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Josh Luthman
Hey if you can do it for $4000 once there is no reason to spend $3000 a
month.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com wrote:

 We have 4 cluster servers doing all the work and I'll say that are a (on
 a high side) $1,000 a piece for hardware. Probably about combined total
 of: 30 hours worth of config time for Spam and Virus protection.

 Sit back and relax.

 I like the idea of have google because of it's feature rich system, but
 that's a lot of money, I'd rather reinvest into more Wireless sites or
 into FTTx systems.


 Thanks,
 Cameron Kilton
 Project Manager
 Midcoast Internet Solutions
 http://www.midcoast.com
 c...@midcoast.com
 (207) 594-8277 x 108

 On 3/30/2011 2:00 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
  What is your current cost for those 7400 email boxes?
 
  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373
 
 
  On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com
  mailto:c...@midcoast.com wrote:
 
  We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost
 $2,600/month
  or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.
 
 
  Thanks,
  Cameron Kilton
  Project Manager
  Midcoast Internet Solutions
  http://www.midcoast.com
  c...@midcoast.com mailto:c...@midcoast.com
  (207) 594-8277 x 108
 
  On 3/29/2011 11:55 AM, Shaun Hoggan wrote:
This is a great dialog on the pros and cons of hosting vs.
  outsourcing
email. While the answer is not going to be the same for everyone,
outsourcing our mail to Google has improved our customer
  experience many
fold and has further entrenched our customers to us as their ISP.
   
IKANO determined several years ago that we could not compete with
 the
Google Gmail. The adage goes, “if you cannot beat them join
  them.” IKANO
ended up moving our mail to Gmail and it has been one of the
  single best
decisions we have made as a service provider.
   
You can find out more about how IKANO is enabling service
  providers to
move to Gmail here:
   
http://partneredition.ikano.com/
   
Shaun Hoggan
   
s...@ikano.com mailto:s...@ikano.com mailto:s...@ikano.com
  mailto:s...@ikano.com
   
801-415-8113
   
*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:
 wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
*On Behalf Of *Mark Nash
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:57 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform
   
Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this
  $.35 per
account price you're getting? I haven't been able to track anyone
  down
about it.
   
Thanks.
   
Mark
   
On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
   
All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email
  headaches go
away. No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail
issues, no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to
  fail
in an email server more often than a web server). No more people
  getting
their password hacked and thousands of emails being sent out. No
 more
IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al databases. I tracked email
  maintenance
time and materials for 6 months, and it was well worth the $.35
 per
email account we spent to let Google do it.
   
It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et.
 al
and select Google as their email provider and put in their login
information.
   
   
Regards,
Chuck
   
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz
  fai...@snappydsl.net mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net
mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net
 wrote:
   
You can slice it any way you like...
   
all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly
  how much
time is spent by yourself or someone vs how much you have to pay
  for the
service...
   
for example.
Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate and secure
 is a
very inexpensive proposition.
Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus
  filtering
services is a very inexpensive proposition..
   
paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of
storage and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...
   
Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread David E. Smith
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:47, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com wrote:

 We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost $2,600/month
 or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.


That's large enough, that it's almost certainly more cost-effective to do it
in-house.

If I were inclined to make up bogus rules-of-thumb, I'd probably say that if
you have fewer than 1000 mailboxes it's likely less expensive to outsource,
and over 5000 you should be doing it in-house. There's a lot of grey area
between those two number, though.

If you do it in-house, there are hardware costs, software costs (even with
open-source you should be donating to the projects that keep your business
running), electricity, cooling, paying someone to keep an eye on all of the
above and to fix it when it breaks... Many people overlook all these
overhead expenses. When you outsource, they give you one number. In-house,
you have to remember to add up all those little numbers, and not everyone
does.

David Smith
MVN.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Scott Lambert
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:00:54PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com wrote:
  
  We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost
  $2,600/month or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.

 What is your current cost for those 7400 email boxes?

If it's anything like around here, about 1/6th, or less, of the
SysAdmin's time plus good hardware and power, which is a minor
fraction of the SysAdmin's salary to cover the administration time.

Which makes having it in-house a definite win.
 
-- 
Scott LambertKC5MLE   Unix SysAdmin
lamb...@lambertfam.org




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Cameron Kilton
This is true and accounted for. I would love nothing more than say 
Google, here you go! and not have to manage the servers.


Thanks,
Cameron Kilton
Project Manager
Midcoast Internet Solutions
http://www.midcoast.com
c...@midcoast.com
(207) 594-8277 x 108

On 3/30/2011 2:14 PM, David E. Smith wrote:


 On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:47, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com
 mailto:c...@midcoast.com wrote:

 We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost $2,600/month
 or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.


 That's large enough, that it's almost certainly more cost-effective to
 do it in-house.

 If I were inclined to make up bogus rules-of-thumb, I'd probably say
 that if you have fewer than 1000 mailboxes it's likely less expensive to
 outsource, and over 5000 you should be doing it in-house. There's a lot
 of grey area between those two number, though.

 If you do it in-house, there are hardware costs, software costs (even
 with open-source you should be donating to the projects that keep your
 business running), electricity, cooling, paying someone to keep an eye
 on all of the above and to fix it when it breaks... Many people overlook
 all these overhead expenses. When you outsource, they give you one
 number. In-house, you have to remember to add up all those little
 numbers, and not everyone does.

 David Smith
 MVN.net





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Dennis Burgess
We just put in server, nice little super micro system, 5 disk array,
SATA with about 6000 e-mails.  I think it was around 4 k for everything,
and it can do quite a bit more, not loaded up much at all. 

 

---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
http://www.linktechs.net/ 
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/
- Author of Learn RouterOS http://routerosbook.com/ 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: March 30, 2011 1:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

 

 

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:47, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com wrote:

We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost $2,600/month
or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.

 

That's large enough, that it's almost certainly more cost-effective to
do it in-house.

 

If I were inclined to make up bogus rules-of-thumb, I'd probably say
that if you have fewer than 1000 mailboxes it's likely less expensive to
outsource, and over 5000 you should be doing it in-house. There's a lot
of grey area between those two number, though.

 

If you do it in-house, there are hardware costs, software costs (even
with open-source you should be donating to the projects that keep your
business running), electricity, cooling, paying someone to keep an eye
on all of the above and to fix it when it breaks... Many people overlook
all these overhead expenses. When you outsource, they give you one
number. In-house, you have to remember to add up all those little
numbers, and not everyone does.

 

David Smith

MVN.net

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Cameron Kilton
What are you using for mail software on this box? Hardware specs? We 
just put in a 6 core 16gb server, but the weak point now if slow disk.


Thanks,
Cameron Kilton
Project Manager
Midcoast Internet Solutions
http://www.midcoast.com
c...@midcoast.com
(207) 594-8277 x 108

On 3/30/2011 2:18 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
 We just put in server, nice little super micro system, 5 disk array,
 SATA with about 6000 e-mails. I think it was around 4 k for everything,
 and it can do quite a bit more, not loaded up much at all.

 *---
 **_Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer_**
 **Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
 Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 http://www.linktechs.net/
 */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training
 http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/ - Author of Learn RouterOS
 http://routerosbook.com//*

 *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 *On Behalf Of *David E. Smith
 *Sent:* March 30, 2011 1:15 PM
 *To:* WISPA General List
 *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

 On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:47, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com
 mailto:c...@midcoast.com wrote:

 We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost $2,600/month
 or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.

 That's large enough, that it's almost certainly more cost-effective to
 do it in-house.

 If I were inclined to make up bogus rules-of-thumb, I'd probably say
 that if you have fewer than 1000 mailboxes it's likely less expensive to
 outsource, and over 5000 you should be doing it in-house. There's a lot
 of grey area between those two number, though.

 If you do it in-house, there are hardware costs, software costs (even
 with open-source you should be donating to the projects that keep your
 business running), electricity, cooling, paying someone to keep an eye
 on all of the above and to fix it when it breaks... Many people overlook
 all these overhead expenses. When you outsource, they give you one
 number. In-house, you have to remember to add up all those little
 numbers, and not everyone does.

 David Smith

 MVN.net





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Chuck Hogg
I think that there is a point where you look at taking this in-house.  We
made a policy that email accounts are purged after 90 days of not being
logged into.  We do have exceptions for those that request it, but for the
most part people were getting email accounts, just to get them.  Then they
never used them.  On average I purge about 50% of the accounts setup for
inactivity.  How many of those 7,400 accounts are active?  I think we were
at 4,000 and then down to 1300 after our first purge over a year ago.

Regards,
Chuck


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com wrote:

 What are you using for mail software on this box? Hardware specs? We
 just put in a 6 core 16gb server, but the weak point now if slow disk.


 Thanks,
 Cameron Kilton
 Project Manager
 Midcoast Internet Solutions
 http://www.midcoast.com
 c...@midcoast.com
 (207) 594-8277 x 108

 On 3/30/2011 2:18 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
  We just put in server, nice little super micro system, 5 disk array,
  SATA with about 6000 e-mails. I think it was around 4 k for everything,
  and it can do quite a bit more, not loaded up much at all.
 
  *---
  **_Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer_**
  **Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
  Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
  http://www.linktechs.net/
  */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training
  http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/ - Author of Learn RouterOS
  http://routerosbook.com//*
 
  *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
  *On Behalf Of *David E. Smith
  *Sent:* March 30, 2011 1:15 PM
  *To:* WISPA General List
  *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform
 
  On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:47, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com
  mailto:c...@midcoast.com wrote:
 
  We have over 7400 email boxes. At $0.35 each that is almost $2,600/month
  or $31,200/year. That is a large expense for email.
 
  That's large enough, that it's almost certainly more cost-effective to
  do it in-house.
 
  If I were inclined to make up bogus rules-of-thumb, I'd probably say
  that if you have fewer than 1000 mailboxes it's likely less expensive to
  outsource, and over 5000 you should be doing it in-house. There's a lot
  of grey area between those two number, though.
 
  If you do it in-house, there are hardware costs, software costs (even
  with open-source you should be donating to the projects that keep your
  business running), electricity, cooling, paying someone to keep an eye
  on all of the above and to fix it when it breaks... Many people overlook
  all these overhead expenses. When you outsource, they give you one
  number. In-house, you have to remember to add up all those little
  numbers, and not everyone does.
 
  David Smith
 
  MVN.net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Matt
 The two that I would look at would be qmailtoaster.com or zimbra.com

Anyone out there using Qmail Toaster?  How does it work?



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Blair Davis


  
  
On 3/29/2011 10:56 AM, Mark Nash wrote:

  
  
  Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this
  $.35 per account price you're getting? I haven't been able to
  track anyone down about it.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Mark
  
  On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
  All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made
my email headaches go away. No more tracking down
spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues, no more hardware
issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email server
more often than a web server). No more people getting their
password hacked and thousands of emails being sent out. No more
IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al databases. I tracked email
maintenance time and materials for 6 months, and it was well
worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let Google do it.
 

It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid
  phone/et. al and select Google as their email provider and put
  in their login information.
  
Regards,
Chuck


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM,
  Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
  wrote:
  
 You can slice it
  any way you like... 
  
  all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate
  honestly how much time is spent by yourself or
  someone vs how much you have to pay for the
  service...
  
  for example.
  Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate
  and secure is a very inexpensive proposition.
  Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam
  / virus filtering services is a very inexpensive
  proposition..
  
  paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some
  ridiculous amount of storage and spam / anti virus is
  a heck of a deal...
  
  Unless you need somethings else that is not
  there... 
  e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that
  we have 'outsourced' security  updates on to a
  third party... and we pay a different third party for
  excellent Spam/Virus filtering...
  
  our problem was very simple... we provide hosting
  packages along with email even though what Google
  and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but we needed
  options which they don't offer.
  
  Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting
  control panel...
  
  Your Mileage May Vary.
  Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom


  
 
  On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
   Exactly, out-sourcing
just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus
their profit.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
It all costs some way.
  You pay for administration, hardware, etc,
  whether you outsource or host it yourself. The
  time savings for me would be well worth $0.35
  per user even in the thousands...may not be
  for others. 
  
  Cameron
  
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011
at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com
wrote:

   Do you have the ability to do
multiple domains with the Google
platform? We
 also offer hosting services that
need email.

  
  To do the switch to Gmail I believe you
  must change all client SMTP
  and POP3 server settings. Yuk. Also,
  depending how many email
  accounts you have $0.35 can really add up
  especially when in the
  thousands.
  
  

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Blair Davis


  
  
We really would like to find someone who could do the Google move
and give us that .35 pricing as well

On 3/29/2011 10:56 AM, Mark Nash wrote:

  
  
  Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this
  $.35 per account price you're getting? I haven't been able to
  track anyone down about it.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Mark
  
  On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
  All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made
my email headaches go away. No more tracking down
spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues, no more hardware
issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email server
more often than a web server). No more people getting their
password hacked and thousands of emails being sent out. No more
IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al databases. I tracked email
maintenance time and materials for 6 months, and it was well
worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let Google do it.
 

It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid
  phone/et. al and select Google as their email provider and put
  in their login information.
  
Regards,
Chuck


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM,
  Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
  wrote:
  
 You can slice it
  any way you like... 
  
  all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate
  honestly how much time is spent by yourself or
  someone vs how much you have to pay for the
  service...
  
  for example.
  Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate
  and secure is a very inexpensive proposition.
  Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam
  / virus filtering services is a very inexpensive
  proposition..
  
  paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some
  ridiculous amount of storage and spam / anti virus is
  a heck of a deal...
  
  Unless you need somethings else that is not
  there... 
  e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that
  we have 'outsourced' security  updates on to a
  third party... and we pay a different third party for
  excellent Spam/Virus filtering...
  
  our problem was very simple... we provide hosting
  packages along with email even though what Google
  and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but we needed
  options which they don't offer.
  
  Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting
  control panel...
  
  Your Mileage May Vary.
  Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom


  
 
  On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
   Exactly, out-sourcing
just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus
their profit.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
It all costs some way.
  You pay for administration, hardware, etc,
  whether you outsource or host it yourself. The
  time savings for me would be well worth $0.35
  per user even in the thousands...may not be
  for others. 
  
  Cameron
  
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011
at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com
wrote:

   Do you have the ability to do
multiple domains with the Google
platform? We
 also offer hosting services that
need email.

  
  To do the switch to Gmail I believe you
  must change all client SMTP
  and POP3 server settings. Yuk. Also,
  depending how many email
  accounts you have $0.35 can really add up
   

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Josh Luthman
http://www.ikano.com/vendor/googleapps_vendor.asp

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:

  We really would like to find someone who could do the Google move and give
 us that .35 pricing as well


 On 3/29/2011 10:56 AM, Mark Nash wrote:

 Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this $.35 per
 account price you're getting?  I haven't been able to track anyone down
 about it.

 Thanks.

 Mark

 On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:

 All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go
 away.  No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues,
 no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email
 server more often than a web server).  No more people getting their password
 hacked and thousands of emails being sent out.  No more IPs ending up in the
 SORBS/et. al databases.  I tracked email maintenance time and materials for
 6 months, and it was well worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let
 Google do it.

  It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al and
 select Google as their email provider and put in their login information.

 Regards,
 Chuck


 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

  You can slice it any way you like...

 all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly  how much
 time is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you have to pay for the
 service...

 for example.
 Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure is a
 very inexpensive proposition.
 Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering
 services is a very inexpensive proposition..

 paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of storage
 and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...

 Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
 e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have
 'outsourced' security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a
 different third party for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...

 our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with
 email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but  we
 needed options which they don't offer.

 Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...

 Your Mileage May Vary.

 Regards

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom



 On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus
 their profit.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


 On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:

 It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, whether
 you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would be well
 worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google
 platform?  We
  also offer hosting services that need email.

  To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
 and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
 accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
 thousands.

  I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
 Personally,
  I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or
 other
  hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated
 and
  blocking spam effectively are much more costly.
 
  Regards,
 
  Cameron
 
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com
 wrote:
 
  http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp
 
  There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
  that you requested.
 
  Frank
 
  On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
  Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
 server
  MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
 investigating
  integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management
 of
  individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can
 run on
  Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book
 module in
  webmail as well.
 
  Anyone have suggestions?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join 

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-30 Thread Cameron Crum
I used to use qmail toaster. It worked great as long as you ran good spam
software with it. I ran spamassassin and spamdyke. I hired Eric Shubes to
set it up for me initially. If you look at any of the forums for qmail
toaster, he is the guy who answers most of the questions. I can get you
contact info if you need. It was a hassle when people's accounts were
compromised and we ended up on RBL's, or when someone got a virus that did
the same. I just didn't like the monthly (or more) maintenance for the spam
filters and cleaning out inactive accounts. I'd certainly pay the $0.35/box
now if I had it to do again.

Cameron

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:

 http://www.ikano.com/vendor/googleapps_vendor.asp


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373


 On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:

  We really would like to find someone who could do the Google move and
 give us that .35 pricing as well


 On 3/29/2011 10:56 AM, Mark Nash wrote:

 Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this $.35 per
 account price you're getting?  I haven't been able to track anyone down
 about it.

 Thanks.

 Mark

 On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:

 All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go
 away.  No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues,
 no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email
 server more often than a web server).  No more people getting their password
 hacked and thousands of emails being sent out.  No more IPs ending up in the
 SORBS/et. al databases.  I tracked email maintenance time and materials for
 6 months, and it was well worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let
 Google do it.

  It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al
 and select Google as their email provider and put in their login
 information.

 Regards,
 Chuck


 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

  You can slice it any way you like...

 all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly  how much
 time is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you have to pay for the
 service...

 for example.
 Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure is a
 very inexpensive proposition.
 Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering
 services is a very inexpensive proposition..

 paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of storage
 and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...

 Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
 e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have
 'outsourced' security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a
 different third party for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...

 our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with
 email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but  we
 needed options which they don't offer.

 Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...

 Your Mileage May Vary.

 Regards

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom



 On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus
 their profit.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


 On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:

 It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, whether
 you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would be well
 worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google
 platform?  We
  also offer hosting services that need email.

  To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
 and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
 accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
 thousands.

  I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
 Personally,
  I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or
 other
  hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated
 and
  blocking spam effectively are much more costly.
 
  Regards,
 
  Cameron
 
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com
 wrote:
 
  http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp
 
  There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the
 requirements
  that you requested.
 
  Frank
 
  On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
  Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
 server
  MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
 investigating
  integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management
 of
  

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Chuck Hogg
All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go
away.  No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues,
no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email
server more often than a web server).  No more people getting their password
hacked and thousands of emails being sent out.  No more IPs ending up in the
SORBS/et. al databases.  I tracked email maintenance time and materials for
6 months, and it was well worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let
Google do it.

It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al and
select Google as their email provider and put in their login information.

Regards,
Chuck


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:

  You can slice it any way you like...

 all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly  how much
 time is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you have to pay for the
 service...

 for example.
 Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure is a very
 inexpensive proposition.
 Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering
 services is a very inexpensive proposition..

 paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of storage
 and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...

 Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
 e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have 'outsourced'
 security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a different third party
 for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...

 our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with
 email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but  we
 needed options which they don't offer.

 Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...

 Your Mileage May Vary.

 Regards

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom



 On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus their
 profit.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


 On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:

 It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, whether
 you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would be well
 worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?
  We
  also offer hosting services that need email.

  To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
 and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
 accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
 thousands.

  I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
 Personally,
  I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or
 other
  hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated
 and
  blocking spam effectively are much more costly.
 
  Regards,
 
  Cameron
 
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com
 wrote:
 
  http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp
 
  There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
  that you requested.
 
  Frank
 
  On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
  Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
 server
  MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
 investigating
  integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management
 of
  individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can
 run on
  Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book
 module in
  webmail as well.
 
  Anyone have suggestions?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Justin Wilson
+1 for Chuck's write up.

E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being able to
get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down that's a big issue
to them.

I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to Google.
Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that particular client.
It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes sense in a lot of cases.

Justin
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support

From:  Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
Reply-To:  WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:  Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:53:08 -0400
To:  fai...@snappydsl.net, WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject:  Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go
away.  No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues,
no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email
server more often than a web server).  No more people getting their password
hacked and thousands of emails being sent out.  No more IPs ending up in the
SORBS/et. al databases.  I tracked email maintenance time and materials for
6 months, and it was well worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let
Google do it.

It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al and
select Google as their email provider and put in their login information.

Regards,
Chuck


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
 
  You can slice it any way you like...
  
  all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly  how much time
 is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you have to pay for the
 service...
  
  for example.
  Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure is a very
 inexpensive proposition.
  Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering
 services is a very inexpensive proposition..
  
  paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of storage and
 spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...
  
  Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
  e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have 'outsourced'
 security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a different third party
 for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...
  
  our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with
 email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but  we
 needed options which they don't offer.
  
  Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...
  
  Your Mileage May Vary.
  
 Regards
 
 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom
 
  
  On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
   Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus their
 profit.
  
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
  
  On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
 It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, whether
 you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would be well
 worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.
  
  Cameron
  
  
 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  
  Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?
 We
   also offer hosting services that need email.
  
  
  To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
  and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
  accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
  thousands.
  
 
   I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
 Personally,
   I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or
 other
   hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated
 and
   blocking spam effectively are much more costly.
  
   Regards,
  
   Cameron
  
   On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com
 wrote:
  
   http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp
  
   There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
   that you requested.
  
   Frank
  
   On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
   Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
 server
   MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
 investigating
   integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management
of
   individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can
 run on
   Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book
 module in
   webmail as well.
  
   Anyone have suggestions?
  
  
  
  
  
 ---
 -
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Josh Luthman
I agree with Chuck.  Every problem I have with Gmail is always getting the
customer to log in.  It is very difficult for them to type their user name
in the box that says user name and their password where it says password.
Outside of that customer every few months, zero problems.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:

 All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go
 away.  No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues,
 no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email
 server more often than a web server).  No more people getting their password
 hacked and thousands of emails being sent out.  No more IPs ending up in the
 SORBS/et. al databases.  I tracked email maintenance time and materials for
 6 months, and it was well worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let
 Google do it.

 It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al and
 select Google as their email provider and put in their login information.

 Regards,
 Chuck



 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:

  You can slice it any way you like...

 all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly  how much
 time is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you have to pay for the
 service...

 for example.
 Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure is a
 very inexpensive proposition.
 Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering
 services is a very inexpensive proposition..

 paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of storage
 and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...

 Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
 e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have
 'outsourced' security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a
 different third party for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...

 our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with
 email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but  we
 needed options which they don't offer.

 Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...

 Your Mileage May Vary.

 Regards

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom



 On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus
 their profit.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com


 On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:

 It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, whether
 you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would be well
 worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google
 platform?  We
  also offer hosting services that need email.

  To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
 and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
 accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
 thousands.

  I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
 Personally,
  I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or
 other
  hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated
 and
  blocking spam effectively are much more costly.
 
  Regards,
 
  Cameron
 
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com
 wrote:
 
  http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp
 
  There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
  that you requested.
 
  Frank
 
  On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
  Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
 server
  MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
 investigating
  integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management
 of
  individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can
 run on
  Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book
 module in
  webmail as well.
 
  Anyone have suggestions?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Matt
Another option is Atmail:

http://www.atmail.com/store/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Fred Goldstein
At 3/29/2011 10:07 AM, Justin wrote:
+1 for Chuck's write up.

E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being 
able to get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down 
that's a big issue to them.

I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to 
Google.  Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that 
particular client.  It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes 
sense in a lot of cases.

Let me put in one user's reason for NOT using Gmail.

Google is in the advertising and data-mining business.  Gmail is 
simply another ad medium for them.  They treat mail as their data, 
read the customers' mail, and inject advertising based upon its 
content.  This is not only creepy, it is dangerous, especially for 
users (like me) who exchange mail that is subject to confidentiality 
rules.  Gmail is probably fine for kids and grannies who are 
exchanging personal message and idle chit-chat, but I don't trust it 
for business. Most ISP-run mail systems honor the privacy of the 
payload, outside of spam filtering.

  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Hi Fred.

While what you present is a Valid Reason not to use Google.. however 
there are other providers who will provide you with the same type of 
service (hosted... similar specs to Google) without them harvesting  
for example Tucows mail service.

Regards.

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net


On 3/29/2011 10:43 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
 At 3/29/2011 10:07 AM, Justin wrote:
 +1 for Chuck's write up.

 E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being
 able to get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down
 that's a big issue to them.

 I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to
 Google.  Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that
 particular client.  It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes
 sense in a lot of cases.
 Let me put in one user's reason for NOT using Gmail.

 Google is in the advertising and data-mining business.  Gmail is
 simply another ad medium for them.  They treat mail as their data,
 read the customers' mail, and inject advertising based upon its
 content.  This is not only creepy, it is dangerous, especially for
 users (like me) who exchange mail that is subject to confidentiality
 rules.  Gmail is probably fine for kids and grannies who are
 exchanging personal message and idle chit-chat, but I don't trust it
 for business. Most ISP-run mail systems honor the privacy of the
 payload, outside of spam filtering.

--
Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
+1 617 795 2701



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Josh Luthman
If you're worried about that, then you wouldn't be using Gmail.  Would you
use your ISP's email and expect confidentiality?  For free?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:

 At 3/29/2011 10:07 AM, Justin wrote:
 +1 for Chuck's write up.
 
 E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being
 able to get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down
 that's a big issue to them.
 
 I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to
 Google.  Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that
 particular client.  It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes
 sense in a lot of cases.

 Let me put in one user's reason for NOT using Gmail.

 Google is in the advertising and data-mining business.  Gmail is
 simply another ad medium for them.  They treat mail as their data,
 read the customers' mail, and inject advertising based upon its
 content.  This is not only creepy, it is dangerous, especially for
 users (like me) who exchange mail that is subject to confidentiality
 rules.  Gmail is probably fine for kids and grannies who are
 exchanging personal message and idle chit-chat, but I don't trust it
 for business. Most ISP-run mail systems honor the privacy of the
 payload, outside of spam filtering.

  --
   Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Mark Nash
Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this $.35 per 
account price you're getting?  I haven't been able to track anyone down 
about it.


Thanks.

Mark

On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches 
go away.  No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail 
issues, no more hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail 
in an email server more often than a web server).  No more people 
getting their password hacked and thousands of emails being sent out. 
 No more IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al databases.  I tracked email 
maintenance time and materials for 6 months, and it was well worth the 
$.35 per email account we spent to let Google do it.


It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al 
and select Google as their email provider and put in their login 
information.


Regards,
Chuck


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net 
mailto:fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:


You can slice it any way you like...

all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly 
how much time is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you

have to pay for the service...

for example.
Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure
is a very inexpensive proposition.
Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus
filtering services is a very inexpensive proposition..

paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of
storage and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...

Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have
'outsourced' security  updates on to a third party... and we pay
a different third party for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...

our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along
with email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great
deal.. but  we needed options which they don't offer.

Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control
panel...

Your Mileage May Vary.

Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom



On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly,
plus their profit.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:

It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware,
etc, whether you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings
for me would be well worth $0.35 per user even in the
thousands...may not be for others.

Cameron

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com
mailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

 Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the
Google platform?  We
 also offer hosting services that need email.

To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all
client SMTP
and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
thousands.

 I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own
server. Personally,
 I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox
with google or other
 hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep
things updated and
 blocking spam effectively are much more costly.

 Regards,

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford
mogoo...@gmx.com mailto:mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

 http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

 There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the
requirements
 that you requested.

 Frank

 On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows
based email server
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we
are investigating
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail,
web management of
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset),
pop3/smtp/imap, can run on
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and
address book module in
 webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
mailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Fred Goldstein
At 3/29/2011 10:50 AM, FaisalIwrote:
Hi Fred.

While what you present is a Valid Reason not to use Google.. however
there are other providers who will provide you with the same type of
service (hosted... similar specs to Google) without them harvesting
for example Tucows mail service.

I agree, and I don't oppose outsourcing email.  I'm just pointing out 
that Google is not necessarily ideal.

I actually have my own email forwarded to my ISP's server, but I own 
the domain and can point it anywhere. I just don't point it at my 
Gmail account, which is mainly reserved for receiving large attachments.

On a more general level, the whole email protocol situation is a 
mess, and should all be redesigned from the ground up.  (It's on my 
long-term road map.) After all, SMTP was basically created in 1972 by 
adding an append function to FTP, with the assumption that users 
would type directly into the distant port.   Hence the dot on a 
line end-of-message convention and 7-bit coding.  I even used that 
on TENEX for a time.  So it's not surprising that it's more difficult 
to manage and unreliable than we'd like it to be.

Regards.

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net


On 3/29/2011 10:43 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
  At 3/29/2011 10:07 AM, Justin wrote:
  +1 for Chuck's write up.
 
  E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being
  able to get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down
  that's a big issue to them.
 
  I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to
  Google.  Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that
  particular client.  It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes
  sense in a lot of cases.
  Let me put in one user's reason for NOT using Gmail.
 
  Google is in the advertising and data-mining business.  Gmail is
  simply another ad medium for them.  They treat mail as their data,
  read the customers' mail, and inject advertising based upon its
  content.  This is not only creepy, it is dangerous, especially for
  users (like me) who exchange mail that is subject to confidentiality
  rules.  Gmail is probably fine for kids and grannies who are
  exchanging personal message and idle chit-chat, but I don't trust it
  for business. Most ISP-run mail systems honor the privacy of the
  payload, outside of spam filtering.
 
 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
 +1 617 795 2701
 
 
 
  
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Chuck Hogg
I think your thoughts purveyed are a little mis-guided.

http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about_privacy.html

Just a few specific items to list:
No email content or other personally identifiable information is ever shared
with advertisers.

Google scans the text of Gmail messages in order to filter spam and detect
viruses, just as all major webmail services do. Google also uses this
scanning technology to deliver targeted text ads and other related
information. This is completely automated and involves no humans.

It is important to note that the ads generated by this matching process are
dynamically generated each time a message is opened by the user--in other
words, Google does not attach particular ads to individual messages or to
users' accounts.


In addition to the information listed above, you can turn advertisements
on/off for your users, if you pay for it.  We have it turned off.

Regards,
Chuck


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:

 At 3/29/2011 10:07 AM, Justin wrote:
 +1 for Chuck's write up.
 
 E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being
 able to get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down
 that's a big issue to them.
 
 I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to
 Google.  Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that
 particular client.  It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes
 sense in a lot of cases.

 Let me put in one user's reason for NOT using Gmail.

 Google is in the advertising and data-mining business.  Gmail is
 simply another ad medium for them.  They treat mail as their data,
 read the customers' mail, and inject advertising based upon its
 content.  This is not only creepy, it is dangerous, especially for
 users (like me) who exchange mail that is subject to confidentiality
 rules.  Gmail is probably fine for kids and grannies who are
 exchanging personal message and idle chit-chat, but I don't trust it
 for business. Most ISP-run mail systems honor the privacy of the
 payload, outside of spam filtering.

  --
   Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Fred Goldstein

At 3/29/2011 11:09 AM, ChuckH wrote:

I think your thoughts purveyed are a little mis-guided.

http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about_privacy.htmlhttp://mail.google.com/mail/help/about_privacy.html

Just a few specific items to list:
No email content or other personally identifiable information is 
ever shared with advertisers.


Google scans the text of Gmail messages in order to filter spam and 
detect viruses, just as all major webmail services do. Google also 
uses this scanning technology to deliver targeted text ads and other 
related information. This is completely automated and involves no humans.


You are more trusting than I.

It is important to note that the ads generated by this matching 
process are dynamically generated each time a message is opened by 
the user--in other words, Google does not attach particular ads to 
individual messages or to users' accounts.


If it does not match ads to messages, then it must be matching ads to 
subscribers, based upon the content of their past messages.  Which 
means that they are storing information based upon the data-mining, 
probably even of deleted messages.


They may not volunteer to share this with advertisers, but it can 
still be obtained under subpoena (which, as Sony has demonstrated 
recently, is really easy to get) and potentially via unautorized 
means (via either security breach or faithless employee).



In addition to the information listed above, you can turn 
advertisements on/off for your users, if you pay for it.  We have it 
turned off.


But does that absolutely stop the scanning?  Or just the webmail display?


Regards,
Chuck


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Fred Goldstein 
mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.comfgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:

At 3/29/2011 10:07 AM, Justin wrote:
+1 for Chuck's write up.

E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being
able to get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down
that's a big issue to them.

I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to
Google.  Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that
particular client.  It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes
sense in a lot of cases.

Let me put in one user's reason for NOT using Gmail.

Google is in the advertising and data-mining business.  Gmail is
simply another ad medium for them.  They treat mail as their data,
read the customers' mail, and inject advertising based upon its
content.  This is not only creepy, it is dangerous, especially for
users (like me) who exchange mail that is subject to confidentiality
rules.  Gmail is probably fine for kids and grannies who are
exchanging personal message and idle chit-chat, but I don't trust it
for business. Most ISP-run mail systems honor the privacy of the
payload, outside of spam filtering.



 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
 +1 617 795 2701 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Josh Luthman
I think the concern is that a decent exploit would unravel that web.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:

 I think your thoughts purveyed are a little mis-guided.

 http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about_privacy.html

 Just a few specific items to list:
 No email content or other personally identifiable information is ever
 shared with advertisers.

  Google scans the text of Gmail messages in order to filter spam and detect
 viruses, just as all major webmail services do. Google also uses this
 scanning technology to deliver targeted text ads and other related
 information. This is completely automated and involves no humans.

 It is important to note that the ads generated by this matching process are
 dynamically generated each time a message is opened by the user--in other
 words, Google does not attach particular ads to individual messages or to
 users' accounts.


 In addition to the information listed above, you can turn advertisements
 on/off for your users, if you pay for it.  We have it turned off.

 Regards,
  Chuck



 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:

 At 3/29/2011 10:07 AM, Justin wrote:
 +1 for Chuck's write up.
 
 E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being
 able to get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down
 that's a big issue to them.
 
 I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to
 Google.  Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that
 particular client.  It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes
 sense in a lot of cases.

 Let me put in one user's reason for NOT using Gmail.

 Google is in the advertising and data-mining business.  Gmail is
 simply another ad medium for them.  They treat mail as their data,
 read the customers' mail, and inject advertising based upon its
 content.  This is not only creepy, it is dangerous, especially for
 users (like me) who exchange mail that is subject to confidentiality
 rules.  Gmail is probably fine for kids and grannies who are
 exchanging personal message and idle chit-chat, but I don't trust it
 for business. Most ISP-run mail systems honor the privacy of the
 payload, outside of spam filtering.

  --
   Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Shaun Hoggan
This is a great dialog on the pros and cons of hosting vs. outsourcing email.  
While the answer is not going to be the same for everyone, outsourcing our mail 
to Google has improved our customer experience many fold and has further 
entrenched our customers to us as their ISP.

IKANO determined several years ago that we could not compete with the Google 
Gmail.   The adage goes, if you cannot beat them join them.  IKANO ended up 
moving our mail to Gmail and it has been one of the single best decisions we 
have made as a service provider.

You can find out more about how IKANO is enabling service providers to move to 
Gmail here:
http://partneredition.ikano.com/


Shaun Hoggan
s...@ikano.commailto:s...@ikano.com
801-415-8113





From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mark Nash
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

Would someone please tell me who to get in touch with for this $.35 per account 
price you're getting?  I haven't been able to track anyone down about it.

Thanks.

Mark

On 3/29/2011 6:53 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
All I'm going to say about this is that Gmail made my email headaches go away.  
No more tracking down spam/antivirus issues, no more webmail issues, no more 
hardware issues with the servers (disks seemed to fail in an email server more 
often than a web server).  No more people getting their password hacked and 
thousands of emails being sent out.  No more IPs ending up in the SORBS/et. al 
databases.  I tracked email maintenance time and materials for 6 months, and it 
was well worth the $.35 per email account we spent to let Google do it.

It is so easy to tell someone to take their iPhone/Droid phone/et. al and 
select Google as their email provider and put in their login information.

Regards,
Chuck

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
fai...@snappydsl.netmailto:fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
You can slice it any way you like...

all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly  how much time 
is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you have to pay for the service...

for example.
Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure is a very 
inexpensive proposition.
Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering 
services is a very inexpensive proposition..

paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of storage and 
spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...

Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have 'outsourced' 
security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a different third party 
for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...

our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with email 
even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. but  we needed 
options which they don't offer.

Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...

Your Mileage May Vary.


Regards



Faisal Imtiaz

Snappy Internet  Telecom



On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus their 
profit.


-

Mike Hammett

Intelligent Computing Solutions

http://www.ics-il.com



On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, whether you 
outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would be well worth 
$0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.

Cameron
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt 
lm7...@gmail.commailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
 Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?  We
 also offer hosting services that need email.
To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
thousands.

 I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server. Personally,
 I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or other
 hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated and
 blocking spam effectively are much more costly.

 Regards,

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford 
 mogoo...@gmx.commailto:mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

 http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

 There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
 that you requested.

 Frank

 On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Chuck Hogg
While you might say more trusting than you, I look at having Google as a
partner to our business contractually bound to an agreement, just like I
would with ATT/Cogent/Level3/Time Warner Telecom.  Your upstream can do
everything and MORE than Google can, yet you don't recognize that as an
issue of faith either.

Only because I previously owned a large advertising firm can I say that the
matching algorithms are not as intrusive as you might think.  Thinking that
Advertisers will be able to sue and use a subpoena to obtain someone's email
content is, well, ludicrous.

We pay Google to scan our email for Virus/Spam...under your current terms
and definitions one should not have that capability in fear of Google have
access to your email.  I don't see that as any different to what they do
with advertisements.

Regards,
Chuck


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:

  At 3/29/2011 11:09 AM, ChuckH wrote:

 I think your thoughts purveyed are a little mis-guided.

  http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about_privacy.html

 Just a few specific items to list:
 No email content or other personally identifiable information is ever
 shared with advertisers.

 Google scans the text of Gmail messages in order to filter spam and detect
 viruses, just as all major webmail services do. Google also uses this
 scanning technology to deliver targeted text ads and other related
 information. This is completely automated and involves no humans.


 You are more trusting than I.


 It is important to note that the ads generated by this matching process are
 dynamically generated each time a message is opened by the user--in other
 words, Google does not attach particular ads to individual messages or to
 users' accounts.


 If it does not match ads to messages, then it must be matching ads to
 subscribers, based upon the content of their past messages.  Which means
 that they are storing information based upon the data-mining, probably even
 of deleted messages.

 They may not volunteer to share this with advertisers, but it can still be
 obtained under subpoena (which, as Sony has demonstrated recently, is really
 easy to get) and potentially via unautorized means (via either security
 breach or faithless employee).



 In addition to the information listed above, you can turn advertisements
 on/off for your users, if you pay for it.  We have it turned off.


 But does that absolutely stop the scanning?  Or just the webmail display?


 Regards,
 Chuck


 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com
 wrote:
  At 3/29/2011 10:07 AM, Justin wrote:
 +1 for Chuck's write up.
 
 E-mail is a very essential service.  People can deal with not being
 able to get to certain web-sites, etc. But, when e-mail goes down
 that's a big issue to them.
 
 I had to go through some soul searching on my first outsource to
 Google.  Took me awhile to pull the trigger.  Glad I did for that
 particular client.  It doesn't make sense for everyone, but makes
 sense in a lot of cases.

 Let me put in one user's reason for NOT using Gmail.

 Google is in the advertising and data-mining business.  Gmail is
 simply another ad medium for them.  They treat mail as their data,
 read the customers' mail, and inject advertising based upon its
 content.  This is not only creepy, it is dangerous, especially for
 users (like me) who exchange mail that is subject to confidentiality
 rules.  Gmail is probably fine for kids and grannies who are
 exchanging personal message and idle chit-chat, but I don't trust it
 for business. Most ISP-run mail systems honor the privacy of the
 payload, outside of spam filtering.

   --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consultinghttp://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-29 Thread Scott Lambert
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:50:38AM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
 If you're worried about that, then you wouldn't be using Gmail.  Would you
 use your ISP's email and expect confidentiality?  For free?

If you are worried about confidentiality, you use PGP, SMIME, or
similar technologies.  Anything less which is transported via SMTP
is smoke and mirrors.

I do expect an ISP to not care enough about what is in my e-mail
to worry about them sniffing around.  After you've gone through a
few mailboxes troubleshooting problems for customers, you realize
that you do not want to go browsing through them; ick; zzz.  There
may be admins sick enough to want to read that drek, but I suspect
they are in a significantly small minority.  They probably exist,
so protect yourself and use encryption or keep it out of the computer
in the first place.

Google is an ad agency.  I expect that their privacy policy says
they don't share specific information about you with their clients.
I suspect it also says that the privacy policy can change at any
time without notice.  I do not trust google to *not* have a tendency
for ads to lean toward get a new pickup type messages while reading
an e-mail from a friend about his new pickup.  TANSTAFL.  Disk and
the power to spin them are not free.  Targeted ads sell for a higher
price.

I have *no* knowledge of any sort of targeted ads being more likely
to be related to the content of an e-mail message on any free e-mail
hosting services.  I simply don't trust human nature that far and
assume privacy will be traded for more profit in the future if that
trade has not already been made.

I run my own personal mail server.  I also run the mail servers at
the ISP at $DAYJOB.  I've been doing this stuff for 13 years.  We
didn't have much choice back then.

I've looked at outsourcing.  I've done away with outsourcing for
the various ISPs we have absorbed.  Everyone.net was advertising
to our customers.  The tech support calls about everyone.net's
advertised upgrades were not good.  We are happier with e-mail
in-house.

Newcomers may decide they need to focus their learning curve time
on other technologies and not want to learn how to properly handle
mail servers.  I encourage them to outsource.   The last thing the
Internet needs is more poorly run mail servers.

I currently like Cyrus-IMAPd and Postfix.  Dovecot looks good too.
I'm just not terribly motivated to try it out. 

We do have a Barracuda SVF 600.  I do not have time to keep up with
the spammers.  I played that game for several years.  I am not in
love with the Barracuda but we are getting what we're paying for.
It does the job.  I don't trust Barracuda Networks either.  I just
don't see a gain for them in data mining my user's e-mail for
anything more than making better filtering rules, so far.

-- 
Scott LambertKC5MLE   Unix SysAdmin
lamb...@lambertfam.org




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Patrick D. Nix, Jr
Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server 
MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating 
integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of 
individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on 
Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book module in 
webmail as well.

Anyone have suggestions?

Thanks,
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
(918) 235-0414
 

Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the 
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Andrew Niemantsverdriet
The two that I would look at would be qmailtoaster.com or zimbra.com

They are both open source and run on Linux and both work really well
without much headache.

Thanks,
 _
/-\ ndrew

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server 
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating 
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of 
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on 
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book module in 
 webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414


 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
 the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
 copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than 
 the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Frank Crawford
http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements 
that you requested.

Frank

On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server 
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating 
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of 
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on 
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book module in 
 webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414
   

 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
 the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
 copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than 
 the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Dennis Burgess
We support and resell mailenable, for the price, can't beat it.  :)  

---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Frank Crawford
Sent: March 28, 2011 3:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
that you requested.

Frank

On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
server MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
investigating integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web
management of individuals mail accounts (with password reset),
pop3/smtp/imap, can run on Windows or Linux.  We would also like a
calendar and address book module in webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414
   

 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this
e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this
information by a person other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized and may be illegal.


 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Cameron Crum
I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server. Personally,
I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or other
hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated and
blocking spam effectively are much more costly.

Regards,

Cameron

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

 http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

 There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
 that you requested.

 Frank

 On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
  Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
 server MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
 investigating integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web
 management of individuals mail accounts (with password reset),
 pop3/smtp/imap, can run on Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar
 and address book module in webmail as well.
 
  Anyone have suggestions?
 
  Thanks,
  Patrick Nix, Jr.,
  Computer Network Solutions
  CSWEB.NET Internet Services
  IT Manager
  http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
  http://www.csweb.net
  (918) 235-0414
 
 
  Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
 the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any
 copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than
 the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Christopher Hair
Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?  We
also offer hosting services that need email.

 

-Chris

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 4:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

 

I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server. Personally,
I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or other
hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated and
blocking spam effectively are much more costly. 

Regards,

Cameron

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
that you requested.

Frank


On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server
MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating
integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of
individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on
Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book module in
webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414


 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than
the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Cameron Crum
I can't see why not.

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Christopher Hair wirele...@ntinet.comwrote:

 Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?
  We also offer hosting services that need email.



 -Chris



 *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
 Behalf Of *Cameron Crum
 *Sent:* Monday, March 28, 2011 4:24 PM

 *To:* WISPA General List
 *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform



 I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
 Personally, I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with
 google or other hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep
 things updated and blocking spam effectively are much more costly.

 Regards,

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

 http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

 There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
 that you requested.

 Frank


 On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
  Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
 server MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
 investigating integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web
 management of individuals mail accounts (with password reset),
 pop3/smtp/imap, can run on Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar
 and address book module in webmail as well.
 
  Anyone have suggestions?
 
  Thanks,
  Patrick Nix, Jr.,
  Computer Network Solutions
  CSWEB.NET Internet Services
  IT Manager
  http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
  http://www.csweb.net
  (918) 235-0414
 
 
  Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
 the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any
 copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than
 the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Matt
 Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?  We
 also offer hosting services that need email.

To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
thousands.

 I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server. Personally,
 I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or other
 hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated and
 blocking spam effectively are much more costly.

 Regards,

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

 http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

 There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
 that you requested.

 Frank

 On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book module in
 webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread David E. Smith
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 17:04, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?
  We
  also offer hosting services that need email.

 To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
 and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
 accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
 thousands.


You could work around that, if you're still willing to run servers on-site.
Point off-site people to Google's MX, run a small SMTP server for your own
customers. POP3, you could work around with something like Perdition. It's
kinda a hack, but it should work in the short-term while you migrate users'
settings.

The pricing might not be that bad, depending on the size of your user base.
If you're hosting your own email, you'll have to pay for some sort of email
filtering (spam and virus), pay for electricity to keep the mail server
running, pay for bandwidth for the 90% of your incoming email that ends up
being discarded by the spam filters anyway.

My network still hosts mail in-house, but it's getting closer and closer to
the point that we can cost-effectively move it out.

David Smith
MVN.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Cameron Crum
It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, whether
you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me would be well
worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be for others.

Cameron

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?
  We
  also offer hosting services that need email.

 To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
 and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
 accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
 thousands.

  I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
 Personally,
  I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google or
 other
  hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated and
  blocking spam effectively are much more costly.
 
  Regards,
 
  Cameron
 
  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com
 wrote:
 
  http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp
 
  There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
  that you requested.
 
  Frank
 
  On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
  Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email
 server
  MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
 investigating
  integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web management of
  individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run
 on
  Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book module
 in
  webmail as well.
 
  Anyone have suggestions?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Mark Nash
We are looking for an email solution to replace Everyone.Net.  They are 
$.35 per user.  Considering both in-house  out-house.



On 3/28/2011 3:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, 
whether you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me 
would be well worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be 
for others.


Cameron

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com 
mailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:


 Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google
platform?  We
 also offer hosting services that need email.

To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
thousands.

 I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server.
Personally,
 I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with
google or other
 hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things
updated and
 blocking spam effectively are much more costly.

 Regards,

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford
mogoo...@gmx.com mailto:mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

 http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

 There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the
requirements
 that you requested.

 Frank

 On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based
email server
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
investigating
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web
management of
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset),
pop3/smtp/imap, can run on
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address
book module in
 webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Tom DeReggi
I'm not advocating to prefer either inhouse or outsource, its a personal 
decission.

But, it is important to understand that the cost to deliver Email services is 
not the primary variable to consider to make the decision to inhouse or 
outsource.

The primary variable is who a WISP wants to let have access to their Clients. 
Email is the number one way to easilly address one's client base.   
Its worth far more than .35 per user, to keep my customer's eyeballs and ears.

Just because I host inhouse Email does not mean I can keep my customer's 
eyeballs, GMail is tough competitions. But for me, its worth trying, 
considering I have the capabilty to have their ears with a live support person, 
and Google only has the option for Eyeballs since it is mostly web support. Not 
to mention, I already have a sunk pre-existing investment in Email server 
software and hardware. But I'm pretty certain it costs me more to host my own 
Email than it would to outsource.  I dont do it to save money, that is for sure.

The question to ask yourself is Do you want to be your customer's support 
person? There can be many benefits to being that, if a WISP takes advantage of 
that opportunity. I observe the bigger problem is that WISPs dont take 
advantage of the opportiunity for what ever reason.  
  
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


  - Original Message - 
  From: Cameron Crum 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:58 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform


  I can't see why not.


  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Christopher Hair wirele...@ntinet.com 
wrote:

Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google platform?  
We also offer hosting services that need email.



-Chris



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 4:24 PM


To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform



I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own server. 
Personally, I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with google 
or other hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things updated 
and blocking spam effectively are much more costly. 

Regards,

Cameron

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements
that you requested.

Frank


On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email 
server MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are 
investigating integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web 
management of individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, 
can run on Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address book 
module in webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414


 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the 
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/








WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless

Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform

2011-03-28 Thread Faisal Imtiaz

You can slice it any way you like...

all I can tell you is that ... when you have evaluate honestly  how much 
time is spent by yourself or someone vs  how much you have to pay for 
the service...


for example.
Paying someone $75/month to keep linux boxes uptodate  and secure is a 
very inexpensive proposition.
Paying someone $0.25 per mailbox for high quality spam / virus filtering 
services is a very inexpensive proposition..


paying $0.35 per mailbox which includes some ridiculous amount of 
storage and spam / anti virus is a heck of a deal...


Unless you need somethings else that is not there...
e.g. in our case, we use internal hosted machines that we have 
'outsourced' security  updates on to a third party... and we pay a 
different third party for excellent Spam/Virus filtering...


our problem was very simple... we provide hosting packages along with 
email even though what Google and Tucows offer is a great deal.. 
but  we needed options which they don't offer.


Maybe next go around we may separate mail from hosting control panel...

Your Mileage May Vary.

Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom



On 3/28/2011 8:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Exactly, out-sourcing just means you just pay for it indirectly, plus 
their profit.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


On 3/28/2011 5:18 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
It all costs some way. You pay for administration, hardware, etc, 
whether you outsource or host it yourself. The time savings for me 
would be well worth $0.35 per user even in the thousands...may not be 
for others.


Cameron

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com 
mailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:


 Do you have the ability to do multiple domains with the Google
platform?  We
 also offer hosting services that need email.

To do the switch to Gmail I believe you must change all client SMTP
and POP3 server settings.  Yuk.  Also, depending how many email
accounts you have $0.35 can really add up especially when in the
thousands.

 I would second qmailtoaster if you have to have your own
server. Personally,
 I would never run my own server again. At $0.35/mailbox with
google or other
 hosted platforms, the time and effort it takes to keep things
updated and
 blocking spam effectively are much more costly.

 Regards,

 Cameron

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Frank Crawford
mogoo...@gmx.com mailto:mogoo...@gmx.com wrote:

 http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp

 There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the
requirements
 that you requested.

 Frank

 On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based
email server
 MailMax.  Because of some support/productivity issues we are
investigating
 integrating a new box.  The requirements are: webmail, web
management of
 individuals mail accounts (with password reset),
pop3/smtp/imap, can run on
 Windows or Linux.  We would also like a calendar and address
book module in
 webmail as well.

 Anyone have suggestions?




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/