---
> > From: "Josh Luthman"
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:16 PM
> > To: "WISPA General List"
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Opinions on LingoWave LW-PTP-5-23
> >
> > 411/433 or 411ah/433ah?
> >
> > 60 megs sounds like a bit much f
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:16 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Opinions on LingoWave LW-PTP-5-23
>
> 411/433 or 411ah/433ah?
>
> 60 megs sounds like a bit much for the non-AH boards, but I never
tested.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office
411/433 or 411ah/433ah?
60 megs sounds like a bit much for the non-AH boards, but I never tested.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
-
2 rb411 will yield same results
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x102
On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Yes. I have personally done 60Mbps of actual traffic across a MT
> using 40mhz of spectrum (only going 1 mile with a -60 signal and
> using P4 systems on ea
Cool! Thank you for the input!
On 7/8/09, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Yes. I have personally done 60Mbps of actual traffic across a MT using 40mhz
> of spectrum (only going 1 mile with a -60 signal and using P4 systems on
> each end). I was also testing "through" the radio link, not using the actual
Yes. I have personally done 60Mbps of actual traffic across a MT using
40mhz of spectrum (only going 1 mile with a -60 signal and using P4
systems on each end). I was also testing "through" the radio link, not
using the actual radios themselves to test.
Travis
Microserv
Josh Luthman wrote:
Travis is right, 80mhz of spectrum (ya...)
Are you saying you saw 60 megs on ONE 40mhz link?!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- S
That would be using two R52 cards on each side (so 80mhz of channel
total). Using MT, the most I have seen using 40mhz channel size is
60Mbps.
Travis
Microserv
Josh Luthman wrote:
FWIW someone in the "School needs 100mbps" thread mentioned they use 433 and
R52 to get 80-90 megs using 40mhz
WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Opinions on LingoWave LW-PTP-5-23
This LingoWave equipment is promising true TCP throughput up to 70
Mbps with a 40MHz wide channel at 5 miles for a little less than $1k.
40Mbps with a 20MHz wide channel (what i use with my tranzeo gear).
On Wed, Jul 8,
FWIW someone in the "School needs 100mbps" thread mentioned they use 433 and
R52 to get 80-90 megs using 40mhz channels
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable,
This LingoWave equipment is promising true TCP throughput up to 70
Mbps with a 40MHz wide channel at 5 miles for a little less than $1k.
40Mbps with a 20MHz wide channel (what i use with my tranzeo gear).
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> If I were in your shoes a 4 mile lin
If I were in your shoes a 4 mile link with 5.8Ghz that needs 20 to 30 megs I
would build a MikroTik kit myself. Cost is really tough to beat (figure $1k
per side on the high end)
I'd suggest the 433AH and XR5 or WLM54AG with the dual pol Pac dishes. If
you want my full parts list let me know.
W
I'm shooting from my office to my tower site which is about 4 miles
away. I am currently using WaveRider 900MHz gear and Tranzeo 5GHz gear
along with a canopy 5.2GHz link.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Perhaps you could share the distance between the two sites and you can g
Perhaps you could share the distance between the two sites and you can get
better information (ie, my works super 50 megs at 1 mile but terrible 100k
at 3 miles) and possibly receive alternative options.
For 5ghz you may want to look at MikroTik, too. I have two dual polarity
5ghz links that work
I'd highly recommend the Trango TLink-45s.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Randy Cosby wrote:
> I really like mineBut, being in a "noisy" area, you may want to
> consider something that is approved for 5.3/5.4 like Trango or Tranzeo.
> Of course distance will be a factor with those.
>
>
>
> Jo
I really like mineBut, being in a "noisy" area, you may want to
consider something that is approved for 5.3/5.4 like Trango or Tranzeo.
Of course distance will be a factor with those.
Josh Luthman wrote:
> I've heard great things about Ligowave's products, especially when you don't
> need
I've heard great things about Ligowave's products, especially when you don't
need 100s of megs it is a good option.
No personal experience with them though.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, th
I'm in the market for a new set of backhauls and my sales rep is
trying to talk to into a set of LingoWave LW-PTP-5-23 units. Does
anybody have an opinion on this LingoWave product?
I operate in a fairly noisy environment and have the need to pass
about 20-30 mbps.
--
~Ron Calhoun
KCnet Wi
18 matches
Mail list logo
