How weird. We need exactly this too. A building we're in that used to be
two, but were combined, and each have their own service drops. There's a
difference in ground potential.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> I've seen a telephone (copper pair) optoisolator which had a s
it allowed for 100
meg transmission up the tower.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson
CCNA CCNT Mikrotik Advanced
http://j2sw.mtin.net/blog
From: Greg Ihnen
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:35:18 -0430
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Optoisolator for Ethernet
On 14 March 2010 23:05, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> That sounds expensive. I wonder if that would help in where there's rf
> problems like at high power broadcast colo's
>
Not terribly expensive.
http://www.google.com/products?q=100base+fx+media+converter&spell=1&oi=spell
That sounds expensive. I wonder if that would help in where there's rf problems
like at high power broadcast colo's
Greg
On Mar 14, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
> We use two fiber transceivers and a jumper on our ethernet when we
> want to have electrical isolation.
>
> On Sun, Mar 14
We use two fiber transceivers and a jumper on our ethernet when we
want to have electrical isolation.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> I've seen a telephone (copper pair) optoisolator which had a short piece of
> fiberoptic cable inside. Each circuit on both sides of the cabl
I've seen a telephone (copper pair) optoisolator which had a short piece of
fiberoptic cable inside. Each circuit on both sides of the cable had their own
highly isolated power supplies. This was the only thing that worked in the
Amazon region to stop phone equipment from getting wiped out durin
