: Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Whats wrong with using XR5's and lowering the TX power on them? They are
more rugged and have better RX sensitivity than many other
General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Well so far the only thing I've seen them good for is one card in running
2.4ghz and another card running 5.8ghz. Those won't interfere with each
other
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
What's what we normally do... I almost never run an AP at it's full
power.
In fact these days I never do.
Someday when I get bored I'll fire up the analyzer and see
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 2:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Greg,
Excellent comments and questions...
And My answer to you is. all of the above.
Scott,
And I agree
: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:34 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
About a week ago there was some discussion about 5ghz radio's being
installed in the same board and causing self-interference on adjacent
channels and possible even on the entire
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Thoughts anyone?
Out of idle curiosity, did you try testing with two cards on the same
board, but with both cards and pigtails wrapped in foil, or otherwise
insulated from one another? With the two cards just being an inch
apart, I imagine you'd still have that nasty
Message
From: Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:36 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
About a week ago there was some discussion about 5ghz radio's being
installed in the same board
10:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
So you are going with what? Rb433's or the rb600?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From
more
too...
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original Message
From: Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:36 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
About
eliminating self-interference test
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Thoughts anyone?
Out of idle curiosity, did you try testing with two cards on the same
board, but with both cards and pigtails wrapped in foil, or otherwise
insulated from one another? With the two cards just being an inch
apart, I imagine
, April 29, 2009 10:48 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Another quick note... if you have individual units why even mount them
like this inside a larger box? Why not put individual RB411s in their
own small box (say DCE 7x6x2) and put
-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Carullo
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:48 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Another quick note
I was wondering the same thing David.
Scott
-- Original Message --
From: David E. Smith d...@mvn.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:42:30 -0500
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Thoughts anyone?
Out of idle curiosity,
) examples all day long out here in the real world.
laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith d...@mvn.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Kurt Fankhauser
7:48 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Another quick note... if you have individual units why even mount them
like this inside a larger box? Why not put individual RB411s in their own
small box (say DCE 7x6x2) and put the box outside right under
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
We used to see that a lot in the old Lucent
Original Message
From: "Kurt Fankhauser" k...@wavelinc.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:36 AM
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
About a week ago there was some discussion about 5ghz rad
Carullo
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:48 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Another quick note... if you have individual units why even mount them
like this inside a larger box? Why not put individual RB411s in their own
wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Date: 04/29/09 12:31
YOu getting good prices on that?
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org lt;http
www.wavelinc.com
- Original Message
From: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Date: 04/29/09 12:13
Also, some dummy loads can act as a poor antenna.nbsp
;gt; To: quot;WISPA General Listquot;
lt;wireless@wispa.orggt;
gt;gt; Subject: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference
test
gt;gt;
gt;gt; About a week ago there was some discussion about 5ghz
radio's
being
gt;gt; installed in the same board and causing self-interference
- Original Message -
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
To: sc...@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Exactly I you don't need long 10' coax lines
Gino
: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
About a week ago there was some discussion about 5ghz radio's being
installed in the same board and causing self-interference on adjacent
channels and possible even on the entire band thus decreasing
, 2009 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Also, some dummy loads can act as a poor antenna. Was this part of the
experiment consistent both times? Maybe run some coax from the boxes separate
directions and then attach the dummy loads?
Scott
: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
About a week ago there was some discussion about 5ghz radio's being
installed in the same board and causing self-interference on adjacent
channels and possible even on the entire band thus
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
How about just decreasing the xr5 power level to about 200mw
I wouldn't put a cm9 on a tower or so
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100
: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Date: 04/29/09 16:41
Good point but. the problem went away when the mcpi cards each had
their own SBC/Case, this would infer card to card or pigtail
wireless@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Date: 04/29/09 16:31
The first question is quot;why are the 4 mpci cards in teh RB600 seeing
each
other so loudlyquot;?
There lies the problem needing fixed, because
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Good point but. the problem went away when the mcpi cards each had their
own SBC/Case, this would infer card to card or pigtail to pigtail
interference, since in all cases the dummy load was outside the cases, from
what it sounds like.
I guess that should be
: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
The RB600 was not in an indoor enclosure but just a normal outdoor
enclosure. The radio's were all low power CM9 cards and they were seeing
each other at -30's.
--
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562
From: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Date: 04/29/09 16:31
The first question is quot;why are the 4 mpci cards in teh RB600 seeing
each
other so loudlyquot
-
From: Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
Whats wrong with using XR5's and lowering the TX power on them?
They are
more rugged and have better RX
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of .
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
I'm curious to know if you're taking about transmit amps or receive
amps. When you say noise are you meaning
33 matches
Mail list logo
