What are the issues with your Barracuda?
John
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
On 2009-07-13 20:08, Don Grossman wrote:
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work
On 2009-07-13 20:08, Don Grossman wrote:
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
resolved.
I tend to use a mix of:
-
We have a mailfoundry, no failures in the 1.5 years it's served as a
gateway, plus no per domain/user fees. Development seems to have stalled
on it though, no new OS releases in a year. It is cost effective,
reliable and flexible and easily managed, coming from the
MailScanner/Spamassassin
We still love (and beat the heck out of) can-it from Roaring Penguin.
http://www.roaringpenguin.com/
On 12/30/2009 2:58 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
We have a mailfoundry, no failures in the 1.5 years it's served as a
gateway, plus no per domain/user fees. Development seems to have stalled
on it
We're running the setup (Postfix, SA, amavisd-new, FuzzyOCR) except
with Cyrus instead of dbmail. Works great.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Jul 20, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I've been running Postfix, amavisd-new, spamassassin, dbmail for many
years and its been rock solid. I've
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Curtis Maurand
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 9:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
I've been running Postfix, amavisd-new, spamassassin, dbmail for many
years and its been rock solid. I've also added
We really like Postfix, courier-imap, amavisd-new (includes
spamassassin), mailgraph, spamakazi, clam-av combo
We have it sitting on a 8 way machine with raid 0+1 15K SCSI drives
with spares.
Solid.
Marco
Argon Technologies Inc.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:09 PM, John
Please see my responses inline
Jeremy Parr wrote:
2009/7/14 David E. Smith d...@mvn.net:
Don Grossman wrote:
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts
I know of Barracudas that the only time they get rebooted is for
firmware updates.
They can run for months without a reboot, but usually the firmware
updates have useful stuff in 3-6 months that requires a firmware upgrade.
John
Charles Wyble wrote:
David E. Smith wrote:
What kind of
-ed.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
The difference with Postini compared to an in-house box is Postini stops the
incoming SPAM before it uses any bandwidth on our backbone. Last time I
checked (over a year ago), it was saving us 3-4Mbps of traffic (24x7
: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
I have rather different anti-spam requirements
For a while now I've been looking for a solution to stop users on a network
sending spam via web-based email like Hotmail, Gmail and Yahoo by scanning
the outgoing HTTP POST command on a proxy server based
: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 5:55 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
I have rather different anti-spam requirements
For a while now I've been looking for a solution to stop users on a network
sending spam via web-based email like Hotmail, Gmail
Don Grossman wrote:
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
resolved. Barracuda is helpful but like to point at other
2009/7/14 David E. Smith d...@mvn.net:
Don Grossman wrote:
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
resolved. Barracuda is
+1 for postfix and the mentioned add ons.
3k and it's not redundant? Good grief.
Though it's not a few hours.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Postfix
Copy/paste from the howtos. Takes like 30 minutes.
Scottie Arnett wrote:
Agreed! Been using Postfix since I told Postini to take a hike. They both use
a modified version of Postfix and related add-ons. You can make a spam
machine out of the cheapest hardware now.
I presume you mean anti spam machine? :)
I have been doing this for over
Sent: 14 July 2009 05:40
To: sarn...@info-ed.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
The difference with Postini compared to an in-house box is Postini stops the
incoming SPAM before it uses any bandwidth on our backbone. Last time I
checked (over
David E. Smith wrote:
What kind of problems were/are you having with your Barracudas? On the
(exceedingly rare) occasion that ours do anything odd, rebooting them
almost always clears it up.
One should NEVER have to reboot a mail server, outside of a kernel
upgrade (and even then one can
; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
I've been a huge fan of Postfix combined with Maia Mailguard
(maiamailguard.com I think). Allows users to modify their own settings,
white lists, blacklists, see little graphs on blocked spam
General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
I have rather different anti-spam requirements
For a while now I've been looking for a solution to stop users on a network
sending spam via web-based email like Hotmail, Gmail and Yahoo by scanning
the outgoing HTTP POST command
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
Block people from using those sites?
Kick them off your network?
Are these end users doing this? Or do they have bot infected machines
using webmail to send spam in an automated fashion? If so then
snort+clamav should do
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
resolved. Barracuda is helpful but like to point at other things like
DNS and
2009/7/13 Don Grossman d...@willitsonline.com:
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
resolved. Barracuda is helpful but like to
2009/7/13 Jeremy Parr jeremyp...@gmail.com:
2009/7/13 Don Grossman d...@willitsonline.com:
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Parr jeremyp...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
2009/7/13 Jeremy Parr jeremyp...@gmail.com:
2009/7/13 Don Grossman d...@willitsonline.com:
It seems
Agreed! Been using Postfix since I told Postini to take a hike. They both use a
modified version of Postfix and related add-ons. You can make a spam machine
out of the cheapest hardware now. I have been doing this for over 3 years and
have a much better customer satisfaction.
Scottie
I've been a huge fan of Postfix combined with Maia Mailguard
(maiamailguard.com I think). Allows users to modify their own settings,
white lists, blacklists, see little graphs on blocked spam for their
specific account in addition to allowing them to help train the system by
going through copies
The difference with Postini compared to an in-house box is Postini
stops the incoming SPAM before it uses any bandwidth on our backbone.
Last time I checked (over a year ago), it was saving us 3-4Mbps of
traffic (24x7). I would guess now it's closer to 7-10Mbps of incoming
SPAM flow that never
28 matches
Mail list logo
