://
www.uwol.net 541-998- 541-998-5599 fax - Original Message
- From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA
General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, September 04,
2007 11:37 AM Subject: [WISPA] Reverse DNS troubles
Gang, I have started having trouble with my customers email
getting
Junction City, OR 97448 http://
www.uwol.net 541-998- 541-998-5599 fax - Original Message
- From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA
General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, September 04,
2007 11:37 AM Subject: [WISPA] Reverse DNS troubles
Gang, I have started having
Gang,
I have started having trouble with my customers email getting
bounced because other
servers are checking the reverse dns, which fails to resolve to my
domain because my
network is served by a satellite connection (I'm the epitome of rural).
Does anyone
know of a work-around, or do I
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Reverse DNS troubles
Gang,
I have started having trouble with my customers email getting
bounced because other
servers are checking the reverse dns, which fails to resolve to my
domain because
A quicker workaround than convincing your IP provider to set the
reverse for you would be to use a remotely dedicated or co-located
server (or even a cheaper virtual server) to bounce all of your
outgoing and incoming mail through. That way you could set up
something like mta.yourdomain.com
://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Reverse DNS troubles
Gang,
I have started having trouble with my customers
Jason wrote:
Does anyone
know of a work-around, or do I have to convince my upstream they need to
change
it to resolve to my domain (which may be hard to get to happen.).
The best way would be to get your upstream to change their reverse
DNS. (They're the only ones who can do it.)
Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
- Original Message -
From: "Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:37 AM
Subject
Jason wrote:
The ip address space is owned by a company that is three or four
layers up in the reseller chain (I'm told that they own the dish on the
other end).
Unless they've properly delegated reverse DNS (and it sounds like they
haven't) you'll either have to work your way up the chain,
:37 AM Subject: [WISPA] Reverse DNS troubles
Gang, I have started having trouble with my customers email
getting bounced because other servers are checking the reverse
dns, which fails to resolve to my domain because my network is
served by a satellite connection (I'm the epitome of rural
If I only have a 16 pubic ip addresses, can I control my reverse dns or
should my upstream be doing that In the past it was always done that
way, but now they are try to change and some of my email is not working
- no reverse dns.
--
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
Carl A jeptha wrote:
If I only have a 16 pubic ip addresses, can I control my reverse dns
or should my upstream be doing that In the past it was always done
that way, but now they are try to change and some of my email is not
working - no reverse dns.
Typically your upstream will handle
Delegated reverse DNS control cannot work with smaller than /24 IP blocks.
-Matt
Carl A jeptha wrote:
If I only have a 16 pubic ip addresses, can I control my reverse dns
or should my upstream be doing that In the past it was always done
that way, but now they are try to change and some
I have several /27s and /28s that I handle their reverse on! These are on
cable compaines and ATT networks too..
On 7/12/07, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delegated reverse DNS control cannot work with smaller than /24 IP blocks.
-Matt
Carl A jeptha wrote:
If I only have a 16 pubic
I have a delegated reverse on a /25 from ATT. If you do a whois on
my netblock the reverse DNS servers are still ATT's, but they forward
all the requests on that block to my servers.
Graham
On 7/12/07, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delegated reverse DNS control cannot work with smaller
My fault; I didn't realize RFC 2317 had changed things.
-Matt
Graham McIntire wrote:
I have a delegated reverse on a /25 from ATT. If you do a whois on
my netblock the reverse DNS servers are still ATT's, but they forward
all the requests on that block to my servers.
Graham
On 7/12/07, Matt
I don't konw if it is RFC or not. Just saying, it can be done!
On 7/12/07, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My fault; I didn't realize RFC 2317 had changed things.
-Matt
Graham McIntire wrote:
I have a delegated reverse on a /25 from ATT. If you do a whois on
my netblock the reverse
They will look into it this afternoon.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
Dennis Burgess wrote:
I don't konw if it is RFC or not. Just saying, it can be done!
On 7/12/07, Matt Liotta [EMAIL
18 matches
Mail list logo
