Re: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS?
I put dns, email (ports 25, 110, 143, 465, 587, 993, 995) and voip (sip, h323, skype) at the top or maybe email just below voip and dns; web ssl and uncategorized in the middle of the range; and p2p at the bottom. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:09 PM, RickG wrote: Since we're on the subject, and RouterOS, what priorities do you put on your traffic? Web, pop3, smtp, dns, icmp, ssl, ftp, snmp, etc... -RickG On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote: RouterOS can identify Skype at layer 7 as well. . * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: The problem I'm having is Skype is not impossible to detect, but it is difficult and some QoS mechanisms miss it because it's designed to be hard to detect and stop so it can slip out networks where the admin tries to block IM apps. The better network security devices and detect and filter or QoS it. But Skype doesn't use TOS or other QoS prioritizing bits and it greatly varies the ports it uses in an effort to not reveal itself. It's really quite amazing, if you have an internet connection but you have a DNS issue (no DNS info being propagated by DHCP for example) it will still find it's way out and connect. It's one quick indication of a good network with bad DNS. Another problem is the newer P2P apps do likewise (random ports, nondescript packets/data) in an effort to prevent ISP operators from blocking or limiting it. So it's a continual game of cat and mouse between the program authors and the net admin folks trying to detect and control these things. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Eric Rogers wrote: Have you done any packet captures? If it is a small site, you might be able to look at the TOS bit and prioritize accordingly. If you see a DSCP (TOS) of 46, I assume it is VoIP and tag it for queues. In Mikrotik, there is a connection type option, and SIP is one of the options. I also tag that one and set it to VoIP for the QoS rules. It gets most traffic, but don't know about Skype. Eric -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:18 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS? Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers (ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from killing Skype - and so far nothing is performing as well as little router with Tomato firmware and it's QoS. The problem is having the layer 7 sniffer properly detect and categorize Skype and uTorrent. I'm getting ready to try RouterOS (x86) and Wolverine. Does anyone have any success stories? Thanks! Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe
Re: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS?
I STRONGLY suggest you put email at 2 if voip is going to be 1. DNS can stay at 1, though. You don't need jitter every time someone sends or receives an email message. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. --- Henry Spencer On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:32 AM, os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: I put dns, email (ports 25, 110, 143, 465, 587, 993, 995) and voip (sip, h323, skype) at the top or maybe email just below voip and dns; web ssl and uncategorized in the middle of the range; and p2p at the bottom. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:09 PM, RickG wrote: Since we're on the subject, and RouterOS, what priorities do you put on your traffic? Web, pop3, smtp, dns, icmp, ssl, ftp, snmp, etc... -RickG On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote: RouterOS can identify Skype at layer 7 as well. . * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: The problem I'm having is Skype is not impossible to detect, but it is difficult and some QoS mechanisms miss it because it's designed to be hard to detect and stop so it can slip out networks where the admin tries to block IM apps. The better network security devices and detect and filter or QoS it. But Skype doesn't use TOS or other QoS prioritizing bits and it greatly varies the ports it uses in an effort to not reveal itself. It's really quite amazing, if you have an internet connection but you have a DNS issue (no DNS info being propagated by DHCP for example) it will still find it's way out and connect. It's one quick indication of a good network with bad DNS. Another problem is the newer P2P apps do likewise (random ports, nondescript packets/data) in an effort to prevent ISP operators from blocking or limiting it. So it's a continual game of cat and mouse between the program authors and the net admin folks trying to detect and control these things. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Eric Rogers wrote: Have you done any packet captures? If it is a small site, you might be able to look at the TOS bit and prioritize accordingly. If you see a DSCP (TOS) of 46, I assume it is VoIP and tag it for queues. In Mikrotik, there is a connection type option, and SIP is one of the options. I also tag that one and set it to VoIP for the QoS rules. It gets most traffic, but don't know about Skype. Eric -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:18 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS? Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers (ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from killing Skype - and so far nothing is performing as well as little router with Tomato firmware and it's QoS. The problem is having the layer 7 sniffer properly detect and categorize Skype and uTorrent. I'm getting ready to try RouterOS (x86) and Wolverine. Does anyone have any success stories? Thanks! Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org
Re: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS?
Thanks! Greg On Feb 14, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: I STRONGLY suggest you put email at 2 if voip is going to be 1. DNS can stay at 1, though. You don't need jitter every time someone sends or receives an email message. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. --- Henry Spencer On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:32 AM, os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: I put dns, email (ports 25, 110, 143, 465, 587, 993, 995) and voip (sip, h323, skype) at the top or maybe email just below voip and dns; web ssl and uncategorized in the middle of the range; and p2p at the bottom. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:09 PM, RickG wrote: Since we're on the subject, and RouterOS, what priorities do you put on your traffic? Web, pop3, smtp, dns, icmp, ssl, ftp, snmp, etc... -RickG On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote: RouterOS can identify Skype at layer 7 as well. . * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: The problem I'm having is Skype is not impossible to detect, but it is difficult and some QoS mechanisms miss it because it's designed to be hard to detect and stop so it can slip out networks where the admin tries to block IM apps. The better network security devices and detect and filter or QoS it. But Skype doesn't use TOS or other QoS prioritizing bits and it greatly varies the ports it uses in an effort to not reveal itself. It's really quite amazing, if you have an internet connection but you have a DNS issue (no DNS info being propagated by DHCP for example) it will still find it's way out and connect. It's one quick indication of a good network with bad DNS. Another problem is the newer P2P apps do likewise (random ports, nondescript packets/data) in an effort to prevent ISP operators from blocking or limiting it. So it's a continual game of cat and mouse between the program authors and the net admin folks trying to detect and control these things. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Eric Rogers wrote: Have you done any packet captures? If it is a small site, you might be able to look at the TOS bit and prioritize accordingly. If you see a DSCP (TOS) of 46, I assume it is VoIP and tag it for queues. In Mikrotik, there is a connection type option, and SIP is one of the options. I also tag that one and set it to VoIP for the QoS rules. It gets most traffic, but don't know about Skype. Eric -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:18 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS? Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers (ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from killing Skype - and so far nothing is performing as well as little router with Tomato firmware and it's QoS. The problem is having the layer 7 sniffer properly detect and categorize Skype and uTorrent. I'm getting ready to try RouterOS (x86) and Wolverine. Does anyone have any success stories? Thanks! Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org
[WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS?
Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers (ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from killing Skype - and so far nothing is performing as well as little router with Tomato firmware and it's QoS. The problem is having the layer 7 sniffer properly detect and categorize Skype and uTorrent. I'm getting ready to try RouterOS (x86) and Wolverine. Does anyone have any success stories? Thanks! Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS?
Have you done any packet captures? If it is a small site, you might be able to look at the TOS bit and prioritize accordingly. If you see a DSCP (TOS) of 46, I assume it is VoIP and tag it for queues. In Mikrotik, there is a connection type option, and SIP is one of the options. I also tag that one and set it to VoIP for the QoS rules. It gets most traffic, but don't know about Skype. Eric -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:18 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS? Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers (ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from killing Skype - and so far nothing is performing as well as little router with Tomato firmware and it's QoS. The problem is having the layer 7 sniffer properly detect and categorize Skype and uTorrent. I'm getting ready to try RouterOS (x86) and Wolverine. Does anyone have any success stories? Thanks! Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS?
The problem I'm having is Skype is not impossible to detect, but it is difficult and some QoS mechanisms miss it because it's designed to be hard to detect and stop so it can slip out networks where the admin tries to block IM apps. The better network security devices and detect and filter or QoS it. But Skype doesn't use TOS or other QoS prioritizing bits and it greatly varies the ports it uses in an effort to not reveal itself. It's really quite amazing, if you have an internet connection but you have a DNS issue (no DNS info being propagated by DHCP for example) it will still find it's way out and connect. It's one quick indication of a good network with bad DNS. Another problem is the newer P2P apps do likewise (random ports, nondescript packets/data) in an effort to prevent ISP operators from blocking or limiting it. So it's a continual game of cat and mouse between the program authors and the net admin folks trying to detect and control these things. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Eric Rogers wrote: Have you done any packet captures? If it is a small site, you might be able to look at the TOS bit and prioritize accordingly. If you see a DSCP (TOS) of 46, I assume it is VoIP and tag it for queues. In Mikrotik, there is a connection type option, and SIP is one of the options. I also tag that one and set it to VoIP for the QoS rules. It gets most traffic, but don't know about Skype. Eric -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:18 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS? Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers (ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from killing Skype - and so far nothing is performing as well as little router with Tomato firmware and it's QoS. The problem is having the layer 7 sniffer properly detect and categorize Skype and uTorrent. I'm getting ready to try RouterOS (x86) and Wolverine. Does anyone have any success stories? Thanks! Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS?
RouterOS can identify Skype at layer 7 as well. . * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: The problem I'm having is Skype is not impossible to detect, but it is difficult and some QoS mechanisms miss it because it's designed to be hard to detect and stop so it can slip out networks where the admin tries to block IM apps. The better network security devices and detect and filter or QoS it. But Skype doesn't use TOS or other QoS prioritizing bits and it greatly varies the ports it uses in an effort to not reveal itself. It's really quite amazing, if you have an internet connection but you have a DNS issue (no DNS info being propagated by DHCP for example) it will still find it's way out and connect. It's one quick indication of a good network with bad DNS. Another problem is the newer P2P apps do likewise (random ports, nondescript packets/data) in an effort to prevent ISP operators from blocking or limiting it. So it's a continual game of cat and mouse between the program authors and the net admin folks trying to detect and control these things. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Eric Rogers wrote: Have you done any packet captures? If it is a small site, you might be able to look at the TOS bit and prioritize accordingly. If you see a DSCP (TOS) of 46, I assume it is VoIP and tag it for queues. In Mikrotik, there is a connection type option, and SIP is one of the options. I also tag that one and set it to VoIP for the QoS rules. It gets most traffic, but don't know about Skype. Eric -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:18 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS? Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers (ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from killing Skype - and so far nothing is performing as well as little router with Tomato firmware and it's QoS. The problem is having the layer 7 sniffer properly detect and categorize Skype and uTorrent. I'm getting ready to try RouterOS (x86) and Wolverine. Does anyone have any success stories? Thanks! Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS?
Since we're on the subject, and RouterOS, what priorities do you put on your traffic? Web, pop3, smtp, dns, icmp, ssl, ftp, snmp, etc... -RickG On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote: RouterOS can identify Skype at layer 7 as well. . * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: The problem I'm having is Skype is not impossible to detect, but it is difficult and some QoS mechanisms miss it because it's designed to be hard to detect and stop so it can slip out networks where the admin tries to block IM apps. The better network security devices and detect and filter or QoS it. But Skype doesn't use TOS or other QoS prioritizing bits and it greatly varies the ports it uses in an effort to not reveal itself. It's really quite amazing, if you have an internet connection but you have a DNS issue (no DNS info being propagated by DHCP for example) it will still find it's way out and connect. It's one quick indication of a good network with bad DNS. Another problem is the newer P2P apps do likewise (random ports, nondescript packets/data) in an effort to prevent ISP operators from blocking or limiting it. So it's a continual game of cat and mouse between the program authors and the net admin folks trying to detect and control these things. Greg On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Eric Rogers wrote: Have you done any packet captures? If it is a small site, you might be able to look at the TOS bit and prioritize accordingly. If you see a DSCP (TOS) of 46, I assume it is VoIP and tag it for queues. In Mikrotik, there is a connection type option, and SIP is one of the options. I also tag that one and set it to VoIP for the QoS rules. It gets most traffic, but don't know about Skype. Eric -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:18 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] RouterOS x86 for Skype QoS? Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers (ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from killing Skype - and so far nothing is performing as well as little router with Tomato firmware and it's QoS. The problem is having the layer 7 sniffer properly detect and categorize Skype and uTorrent. I'm getting ready to try RouterOS (x86) and Wolverine. Does anyone have any success stories? Thanks! Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org
