, April 08, 2010 9:05 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Kurt,
Are they reliable? They seem to be much lower cost compared to
what we've used previously (Snaptec).
Pat
Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:54:03AM -0400, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> This should fix your
r
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Patrick Cole
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:31
, April 07, 2010 12:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Phil,
The units we had would not boot unless they were powered using 48V.
This also caused us some dramas since our sites had 12V supplies
predominantly. The spec sheet of the radio lists a wide input
voltage but
Phil,
The units we had would not boot unless they were powered using 48V.
This also caused us some dramas since our sites had 12V supplies
predominantly. The spec sheet of the radio lists a wide input
voltage but acording to support our hardware required the 48.
The radios were definitely brand
Actually it is a Ubiquti radio and the power supply does not need to
be 48 volts, 9-48 works fine for the Gateworks board (Avila GW2348-2).
We had moisture get in the ethernet jack and burn the pins when it
was using 48 volts, so we switched to a Ubiquti 15 volt adapter and
have not had any proble
-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 7:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
270 customers will squash Ubiquiti if you put that kind of weight on its
shoulders. I strongly advise against a "higher end" backhaul. I love
270 customers will squash Ubiquiti if you put that kind of weight on its
shoulders. I strongly advise against a "higher end" backhaul. I love
MikroTik but at 270 customers, that is kind of iffy in my opinion. I'd
probably do it based on the fact that they always work for me and their
price point
I would steer well clear of that UBNT bridge for something as critical
as you describe. At the price point it just screams disaster.
I've not used the Ligowave MIMO radios however I have used the LigoPTP 5-N
and I was a little disappointed. The lack of QoS is a definite negative.
We had one of
OK I just got off the phone with a salesman that was discouraging me away from
UBNT rockets for this link. I will be running 4 towers through this link with
270 clients. His concern was that they had learned of a 20,000 packet per sec
limit compared to Ligowave @ 75,000 packets. Now I am looki
ld be for long range
> production.
>
> Bob-
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:36 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re
Same firmware.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
PowerBridgeM5 says 20km of distance but I guess that&#
et Service
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Robert West
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:33 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
I wouldn't go with a panel antenna at that range.
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Robert West"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:32 PM
> To: "'WISPA General List'"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
>
>
>> I wouldn't go with a panel antenna at tha
Not to mention running 40MHz channels long range at 25dbi.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Is
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Is PowerBridge vs. NanoBridge just panel vs. dish?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-i
Is PowerBridge vs. NanoBridge just panel vs. dish?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Robert West"
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:32 PM
To: "'WISPA General List'&qu
I have better luck with
a parabolic type antenna be it grid or dish.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
The problem is resolvable, that issue is caused by the multicast kernel
module they load.
I believe it should be resolved in the next firmware iteration, rather
then having to manually unload the module.
Regards
Michael Baird
> We've had issues with Ubiquiti and OSPF. We've had to move some si
Climbing Network Support
From: Steve Barnes
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:18:24 -0400
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Wondering if anyone has an opinion good/bad on the Ubiquity PowerBridgeM5.
Need it for a 12 mile link with heavy traffic
We've had issues with Ubiquiti and OSPF. We've had to move some sites
to BGP to fix the problem.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Pretty pricey, $265 each retail. They aren't available on the market yet
either, I'd be careful about being an early adopter with Ubiquiti gear.
Regards
Michael Baird
> Wondering if anyone has an opinion good/bad on the Ubiquity PowerBridgeM5.
>
> Need it for a 12 mile link with heavy traffic. Br
Wondering if anyone has an opinion good/bad on the Ubiquity PowerBridgeM5.
Need it for a 12 mile link with heavy traffic. Bridged with OSPF pass through.
Something better. Also Looked at the LigoWave LigoPTP5-23 MiMo but prefer
UBNT price.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
22 matches
Mail list logo
