I have alot of Waverider equipment I need to get rid of.. 2004-2005-2006 and
CCU'S.. anyone interested? please hit me off list..
webbil...@surfmore.net
jeanh...@surfmore.net
or phone the office or my cell.
931-363-7700 office
931-638-7873 cell..
Thanks Jean
I am in need of some of the early 3000 EUM radio connectors for LMR200
cable. We do not deploy them any longer, but I have customers who still
pick up the radios and yank the connector off the cable or break them.
Anyone know where I might find them or have any laying around on a shelf?
Thank
: [WISPA] WaveRider connectors needed
I am in need of some of the early 3000 EUM radio connectors for LMR200
cable. We do not deploy them any longer, but I have customers who still
pick up the radios and yank the connector off the cable or break them.
Anyone know where I might find them or have any
12:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] WaveRider connectors needed
I am in need of some of the early 3000 EUM radio connectors for LMR200
cable. We do not deploy them any longer, but I have customers who still
pick up the radios and yank the connector off the cable or break them
] On
Behalf Of David Hulsebus
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WaveRider connectors needed
I ordered 10 of them a few months ago but they only fit LMR195 and we
have LMR200 everywhere. If we need to replace the cabling I guess we
will - much easier
An elevated noise floor will push your avg rssi levels up basically
making your acceptable EUM signal levels higher than usual. A typical
EUM under perfect conditions can have link up to -89, but with an
elevated noise floor the acceptable signal level becomes higher and
higher. You'll need
I think a lot depends on what the signal strength is on the CCU (AU)
side. I several links that from the EUM (SU) are worse than -85, but at
the CCU they are better than -78. Mind you these links aren't supper
fast though, especially on the upload. It's okay if they're a lower
usage customer.
Mac OS X (bash) says:
ping -i.4 192.168.7.1
ping: -i interval too short: Operation not permitted
using sudo makes it work.
It might be the same for Linux.
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Kevin R. Battersby wrote:
On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote:
That is from the CCU side. In all
What about using flood ping -f. Does that work in Linux. I use that in Mac OS
X.
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Kevin R. Battersby wrote:
On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote:
That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping
spikes. Is there any other
Part of their mac polling will turn it off if their is not traffic for a while.
If I remember correctly their is a high priority setting that will keep it up.
I will check all that at the office Monday.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:34 PM, Kevin R. Battersby ke...@battersby.net
Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipment?
With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS
reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen another
WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients are at -80 to
I had some links like that when we used waverider but it was on sectors with
little interference. They will probably work if you have a low noise floor.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in
Brent Havens of Mark Twain Coop is looking for some Waverider gear. If you
have the following available, please contact Brent offlist.
bhav...@marktwain.coop
His request is:
Do you know of anyone that has either stopped using the waveriders or a
vendor that sells used Vecima gear. I need a
I saw a lot of Vecima 900 MHz peanuts dormant in a closet at Atria Networks in
Peterborough, ON
F.
On 2010-05-13, at 1:09 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Brent Havens of Mark Twain Coop is looking for some Waverider gear. If you
have the following available, please contact Brent offlist.
I saw a lot of Vecima 900 MHz peanuts dormant in a closet at Atria Networks in
Peterborough, ON
F.
On 2010-05-13, at 1:09 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Brent Havens of Mark Twain Coop is looking for some Waverider gear. If you
have the following available, please contact Brent offlist.
I think ther are specific issues regarding ofdm and 900 MHz that
causes problems. We did everything possible to fix noise and radio
issues. We use all tiltek sector antennas with lmr cabling and cavity
filters at each radio. We were able to get sporadic speeds up to
8mbps. We did a radio
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of my_em...@webjogger.net
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 5:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Waverider Vs Alvarion VL 900
Hi,
We're planning to upgrade a lot of our 900MHz equipment which is
currently
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of my_em...@webjogger.net
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 5:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Waverider Vs Alvarion VL 900
Hi,
We're planning to upgrade a lot of our 900MHz equipment which is
currently predominantly Alvarion
but for now, just external.
-Cameron
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Ron Calhoun
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Waverider Vs Alvarion VL 900
The last I check waverider
Calhoun
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Waverider Vs Alvarion VL 900
The last I check waverider was claiming their ccu8000 would push
13mbps. I have used the CCU8000 with the eum8000 and was only able to
pull a 4mb test from the ccu
, 2009 1:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Waverider Vs Alvarion VL 900
Most of the customer I'll be upgrading have external antennas already,
so I'm hoping that upgrade process will be relatively easy by just
changing the indoors radio. For new customers I think it's good
I'd really like to hear some success stories from people using Name brand
900Mhz OFDM, compared to non-OFDM..
Or more importantly, if anyone has had bad experience with Name brand 900Mhz
OFDM, compared to non-OFDM..
I'd also like input from Name Brand OFDM 900Mhz manufacturers regarding what
You shouldn't have to worry too much about the old product because I
think they did a 100% field upgrade at no cost to owners of those AUs,
right? You should still check, but I would hope it'd be unusual to
find an upgraded unit for sale.
Chuck
On Sep 29, 2009, at 12:30 AM, Nick Huanca
They have upgraded one of my older units as well. I have two more of the
older units left, thankfully they are in the air and in low noise areas, I
hope to have them upgraded soon just because.
-Cameron
You shouldn't have to worry too much about the old product because I
think they did a 100%
Hi,
We're planning to upgrade a lot of our 900MHz equipment which is
currently predominantly Alvarion Breeze Access 900. The main goal is to
provide the customer with better speeds
The 2 options I'm considering are Alvarion VL900 and Waverider CCU8000
I was wondering if anyone has experience
I have no experience with the Waverider equipment, but Alvarion's
pretty darn good (and we do have experience with that).
Chuck
On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:24 PM, my_em...@webjogger.net wrote:
Hi,
We're planning to upgrade a lot of our 900MHz equipment which is
currently predominantly Alvarion
I had around 12 waverider lms8000 radios installed. They were a
nightmare. We had problems from day one and pulled all of them. Unless
they have made some changes I would stay away from them. Also the
dongle on the 8000's were a big problem.
Sent from my iPhone
- End of message -
Hi Jon,
We've had extensive experience with the VL900 product line, even through its
rough release to market. After Alvarion fixed their hardware and software
bugs I could recommend this product hands down based on our experience.
Beware of used equipment that may not operate *at all* in minimal
Try these guys http://www.surpluswirelessgear.com/.
jack
John Scrivner wrote:
I am searching for spare gear. Lightning just took another old Waverider
CCU. If any of you have some collecting dust I am buying. Hit me offlist
with subject line of Waverider CCU.
Thanks guys,
Scriv
I am searching for spare gear. Lightning just took another old Waverider
CCU. If any of you have some collecting dust I am buying. Hit me offlist
with subject line of Waverider CCU.
Thanks guys,
Scriv
WISPA Wants
I have a customer with one of these and they just want the RouterOS box
in front of it to pass DHCP out. Simple BRIDGE as easy as pie, anyone
have any docs, suggestions on how to make this thing work?
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+,
Dennis Burgess wrote:
I have a customer with one of these and they just want the RouterOS box
in front of it to pass DHCP out. Simple BRIDGE as easy as pie, anyone
have any docs, suggestions on how to make this thing work?
I think you're looking for the protocol command. Probably protocol
Dennis, Three things..
1. The radio does need to be in switched mode not routed if you are
using the MKTK as the router. protocol switched
2. The DHCP relay server IP needs to be added DHCP add X.X.X.X
3. Enable the DHCP relay DHCP enable
That should do it. Make sure the CCU knows how to get to
I have a WaveRider CCU3000 that has been rebooting itself randomly for a
couple of months, it started out every day or two, now it's multiple
times a day. I've changed transmitters, power supply, etc... everything
but the LDF6 and Antel antenna, and it continues. Has anyone seen a
client
I had this same problem with my CCUs. My support guy said that it was
a buffer problem. I solved the problem by doing a firmware upgrade.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:14 PM, David Hulsebuscont...@portative.net wrote:
I have a WaveRider CCU3000 that has been rebooting itself randomly for a
couple
Forbes Mercy wrote:
What brand of AP's can a 900 MHZ EUM connect to?
Waverider EUMs will only connect to Waverider CCUs, as far as I know.
I'm reasonably certain the CCU (head-end) stuff is backwards-compatible,
so these 3000-series EUMs should be able to talk to the newer CCUs, but
What brand of AP's can a 900 MHZ EUM connect to?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: Mike Scrivner
Subject: [WISPA] Waverider EUMs for sale
We
We have 30 surplus used Waverider 900 MHz EUMs and power supplies for
sale. These units were all fully functional when removed from service.
Guaranteed no DOA.. Asking $100 each or best offer. We will split
these up if you do not want all 30 of them. Contact m...@mvn.net
offlist to arrange for
Just a little reminder if anyone was interested... Last I checked it was
around $500
Search ebay for waverider
--
John M. McDowell
Boonlink Communications
307 Grand Ave NW
Fort Payne, AL 35967
256.844.9932
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.boonlink.com
This message contains information which may be
Im looking for some power supplies for WR eum 3003 and 3004. If you
know where I can find some hit me offlist.
Thanks
Chris Cooper
Intelliwave
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
So does anyone have the latest scoop on WaveRider? Stability, product
pipeline etc. It seems like most of the old names/faces are gone.
Chris
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
What do you want to know? Stability and software is excellent, great
polling mechanism. 2mb Ethernet through put. I have seen them maintain
a connection (in a clean rf environment) down to about -98db 10db below
spec.
Erik
chris cooper wrote:
So does anyone have the latest scoop on
We are testing a new WR cell. The target rssi generated by the design
guide and real field tests show 10-12 db performance delta. Anyone care
to weigh in on this? Is this reality- the difference between vendor
spec and real world tests or should we look deeper for a problem? We've
already
hello
anyone running waverider 900 mhz
understand what packets nomatch means.about a week ago our ccu started showing
about 85% packets nomatch.contacted waverider and they said it meant someone was
broadcasting on the same frequency we were using and recomended we remove our
filter and
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Waverider 900 mhz throughput
I do not think you will find any 900 Mhz 2M X 2M solutions out there
that will scale well. I use Waverider and it works really well for my
service. I offer two plans. 768K and 256K
: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Waverider 900 mhz throughput
I do not think you will find any 900 Mhz 2M X 2M solutions out there
that will scale well. I use Waverider and it works really well for my
service. I offer two plans. 768K and 256K up
PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Waverider 900 mhz throughput
I take it from this post regarding Canopy that the other systems you
tested were not as much speed? Waverider has more aggregate throughput
than what
I take it from this post regarding Canopy that the other systems you
tested were not as much speed?
Yes
If you want to compare then let us see what you have seen for all the
systems you have tested. Let's compare apples to apples.
We have already done that
-Charles
--
WISPA Wireless
*Sent:* Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:31 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Waverider 900 mhz throughput
Regarding which, when will the reports on 900 MHz et al be
released to attendees of the conference?
Wondering what to do with my waverider given new
49 matches
Mail list logo
