Re: [WISPA] transparent caching solution w/TPROXY

2012-02-29 Thread Matt
 I'll check out those other caching solutions. I was going through the
 ryohnosuke.com website, it's in Spanish (Via google translate). The main
 company referred me to him to coordinate since he speaks English.

 To get it setup in the Mikrotik it took a couple of mangle prerouting
 rules and a route with a routing mark. It actually just routes the
 traffic to the cache instead of redirect, this keeps the transparency
 working nicely. If I disable the mangle rules then nothing goes through
 the cache.

In Mikrotik I imagine you just use mangle to add routing marks to port
80 traffic then add routes based on those marks.  Do websites accessed
see the IP of the cache or IP of the user behind the cache?

Can you munge your mangle and routing rules and post them?
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] transparent caching solution w/TPROXY

2012-02-23 Thread Matt
 You probably mean Portuguese, not Spanish. Thundercache is a popular
 but somewhat controversial cache here in Brazil due to GPL code
 misappropriation. You might want to look at
 InComum(http://sourceforge.net/projects/incomum/) for a free resource
 or CacheMara from MaraSystems(http://www.marasystems.com/) for a
 commercial product that gives back to the GPL codebase.

In one location I manage we have an overloaded circuit waiting on the
GigE fiber to complete supposedly in a month but they have missed
deadlines before.  Wandering if this would fit the bill in the mean
time.  In past Squid did not do much good due to streaming video etc
but if this works on youtube etc this might help.  In a Mikrotik
gateway would you just do a DST-NAT on port 80 to the Squid box?
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] transparent caching solution w/TPROXY

2012-02-23 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181)
I've really missed my old Cobalt CacheRAQ.  That thing was amazing.

I lack the technical ability to set anything up though.

If we do one I'd like it to be a transparent pass through device.  Upstream 
in one port, customers in the other.

What would it cost to set something up (I already have a server that can be 
used) and what are people using?

The issue I've been afraid of is the pass through speed.  We pay for 
internet based on usage (95%th) and any Caching would save money and make 
things run faster.

Ideas?  Consultants?

laters,
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com
To: d...@kyes.com; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] transparent caching solution w/TPROXY


 We have a site that costs @ $3800/month for (shared) 3Mbps/512Kbps
 (Satellite), so we have been caching with Mikrotik proxy since the
 beginning (1998). I found a caching system that works well and caches
 videos and other types of traffic. If anyone is in the same situation
 you may want to check out Thundercache. It's a little tough because the
 sites using it are mostly in Spanish. I have 400GB of cache on it (3
 drives). Now the users will be able to be cached and retain their public
 IP.

 You probably mean Portuguese, not Spanish. Thundercache is a popular
 but somewhat controversial cache here in Brazil due to GPL code
 misappropriation. You might want to look at
 InComum(http://sourceforge.net/projects/incomum/) for a free resource
 or CacheMara from MaraSystems(http://www.marasystems.com/) for a
 commercial product that gives back to the GPL codebase.


 Rubens
 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] transparent caching solution w/TPROXY

2012-02-23 Thread Dan Ferguson
Hello Matt,

I'll check out those other caching solutions. I was going through the 
ryohnosuke.com website, it's in Spanish (Via google translate). The main 
company referred me to him to coordinate since he speaks English.

To get it setup in the Mikrotik it took a couple of mangle prerouting 
rules and a route with a routing mark. It actually just routes the 
traffic to the cache instead of redirect, this keeps the transparency 
working nicely. If I disable the mangle rules then nothing goes through 
the cache.

- Dan








On 2/23/2012 6:52 AM, Matt wrote:
 You probably mean Portuguese, not Spanish. Thundercache is a popular
 but somewhat controversial cache here in Brazil due to GPL code
 misappropriation. You might want to look at
 InComum(http://sourceforge.net/projects/incomum/) for a free resource
 or CacheMara from MaraSystems(http://www.marasystems.com/) for a
 commercial product that gives back to the GPL codebase.
 In one location I manage we have an overloaded circuit waiting on the
 GigE fiber to complete supposedly in a month but they have missed
 deadlines before.  Wandering if this would fit the bill in the mean
 time.  In past Squid did not do much good due to streaming video etc
 but if this works on youtube etc this might help.  In a Mikrotik
 gateway would you just do a DST-NAT on port 80 to the Squid box?
 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] transparent caching solution w/TPROXY

2012-02-22 Thread Dan Ferguson
Hello,

We have a site that costs @ $3800/month for (shared) 3Mbps/512Kbps 
(Satellite), so we have been caching with Mikrotik proxy since the 
beginning (1998). I found a caching system that works well and caches 
videos and other types of traffic. If anyone is in the same situation 
you may want to check out Thundercache. It's a little tough because the 
sites using it are mostly in Spanish. I have 400GB of cache on it (3 
drives). Now the users will be able to be cached and retain their public 
IP.

I thought someone out there might need this also.

Best,

- Dan

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] transparent caching solution w/TPROXY

2012-02-22 Thread Rubens Kuhl
 We have a site that costs @ $3800/month for (shared) 3Mbps/512Kbps
 (Satellite), so we have been caching with Mikrotik proxy since the
 beginning (1998). I found a caching system that works well and caches
 videos and other types of traffic. If anyone is in the same situation
 you may want to check out Thundercache. It's a little tough because the
 sites using it are mostly in Spanish. I have 400GB of cache on it (3
 drives). Now the users will be able to be cached and retain their public
 IP.

You probably mean Portuguese, not Spanish. Thundercache is a popular
but somewhat controversial cache here in Brazil due to GPL code
misappropriation. You might want to look at
InComum(http://sourceforge.net/projects/incomum/) for a free resource
or CacheMara from MaraSystems(http://www.marasystems.com/) for a
commercial product that gives back to the GPL codebase.


Rubens
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless