Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-03 Thread Dawn DiPietro
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:14 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110) Dawn, Could you tell us what interest you believe there should be for WISPs involving this proceeding? I am doubting

Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-02 Thread John Scrivner
Dawn, Could you tell us what interest you believe there should be for WISPs involving this proceeding? I am doubting it as much as I would like to know your personal thoughts on the subject. Kris Twomey looked into this for me some time back and told me it is of no concern for WISPs. If you

RE: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-02 Thread Rick Smith
potential horrendous MOBILE interference to 5805 channels... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:14 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110) Dawn, Could you tell

Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-02 Thread John Scrivner
926 and above useless. See ... ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:31 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110) Actually I was told that this is above

Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-02 Thread Rich Comroe
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:14 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110) Dawn, Could you tell us what interest you believe there should be for WISPs involving this proceeding? I am doubting

Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-02 Thread Rich Comroe
: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110) Actually I am able to use the entire 900 MHz band here. Selectivity of tuners has never been an issue the FCC seems very willing to consider when adjacent uses are being suggested. As I understand it the systems being

Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-02 Thread John Scrivner
troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC band usage. Rich - Original Message - From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110) Actually I was told that this is above

Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-02 Thread Rich Comroe
: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:50 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110) Why on earth do they want to overlap UNII bands for this purpose? Do they want both UNII and this new system to fail? Why

Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)

2006-11-02 Thread John Scrivner
-band usage may be more troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC band usage. Rich - Original Message - From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110) Actually I