RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Lee Weers
As far as the range is concerned we do get a greater range with the 1252's. I can't say we use this as a feature, because we didn't have a lot of wireless deployed before. Where we did have it deployed before we have put in more access points to do a capacity model rather than a coverage model.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Peter P Morrissey
Thanks for sharing that. Have you ever considered midspan devices for when you need more than a handful of bricks? http://www.microsemi.com/powerdsine/Products/Midspan/ Pete Morrissey -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Lee Weers
Something else is power. The power draw according to the brick is .95 amps at 120V. I haven't seen them actually draw that much power, but we planned for it. -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter P

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Greg Gardner
On that topic, has anyone taken a look at how many AP's they deployed on a sq ft basis in your environment? We are trying to estimate how many we need for full coverage and it looks like the usual guidelines that Cisco provides (2000-2500 sq ft per AP), doesn't work that well for us. Thanks,

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Toivo Voll
A lot depends on what kind of construction your building is -- brick, concrete and concrete block is entirely different from drywall and open spaces. The other aspect is your definition of full coverage. If you want the location functionality to work, you need much higher density and different

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Lee H Badman
Hi Greg- The square-footage models scare me, quite frankly. Rather than a one-size-fits all WAG based on footage, we've come to trust both Ekahau and AirMagnet planning tools for budgetary planning- takes a bit of time to get your attenuation sources right, but the final guestimate ends up a lot

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Barber, Matt
I did give our square-footage, but I completely agree with Lee and Toivo. We based our coverage on having a strong signal in 11a with Meru Coverage Planner (a re-branded Ekahau I believe). Matt Barber Network Analyst / PC Support Morrisville State College 315-684-6053 -Original

Re: Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Nathan Hay
We use PowerDSine mid-spans with our Meru AP320s. Specifically the PD-7012G/AC/M (12-port) and PD-7006G/AC/M (6-port). They've worked well for us. Nathan Nathan P. Hay Network Engineer Computer Services Cedarville University www.cedarville.edu ( http://www.cedarville.edu/ ) Barber,

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Dan McCarriar
We use PowerDSine also (including the 24-port model) with our Aruba AP-125s. -Dan On Nov 12, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Nathan Hay wrote: We use PowerDSine mid-spans with our Meru AP320s. Specifically the PD-7012G/AC/M (12-port) and PD-7006G/AC/M (6-port). They've worked well for us. Nathan

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Barber, Matt
Thank you both. We are going to be using the 6 and 12 ports as well, as I think the 24 port doesn't supply full 802.3at power to all 24 ports. Glad to hear the products are working for you. Matt Barber Network Analyst / PC Support Morrisville State College 315-684-6053 From: The