OK, Lee now you have me confused.
I have seen you at Aruba user conferences, so I thought you knew their
product. I have heard Meru prefers a common setup for all APs on a controller
(or at least they did), but I did not think you were using them.
Our Aruba system lets us set data rates on an
Hi Bruce-
Your confusion is justified. Though I was at the Aruba conference, I am a Cisco
customer. I should have put a finer point on my lament- I wish ALL
controller-based wireless systems allowed for per AP settings like data rate
variances.
:)
Lee
Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network
We have yet to deploy 802.11n, but are starting to investigate, so please
excuse the newbie question. Could someone quickly explain the need/logic to
set minimum rates on the 2.4ghz radios to run 802.11n at that frequency
level? I'm assuming it's to limit the downgrading of the 802.11n performance
Lee (and others), correct me if I'm wrong here:
Assuming a wireless deployment engineered for density over coverage
(lots of APs for clients to connect to), there should be few and far
between cases where having all rates enabled would have an impact on
your system. That is, very small chance of
Yeah- what he said.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hanset, Philippe C
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:05 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
All,
(I checked the Archives and couldn't find anything on this)
One of our desktop support guy is losing his mind on a problem with three iMacs
that have a very erratic behavior on wireless only.
-Those iMacs were purchased during the last month.
-They can join Wireless
-They can get a DHCP
We have had lots of problems with firefox and our aruba in general when used
with the captive portal. You didn't mention if this is 802.1x or CP or WPA but
safari and firefox seem to have problems with our CP on aruba over wireless
only.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group
This is on an open SSID with NetReg in the back end. No portal, no 802.1x.
Philippe
On Jun 1, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Jason Appah wrote:
We have had lots of problems with firefox and our aruba in general when used
with the captive portal. You didn’t mention if this is 802.1x or CP or WPA but
We had an issue a couple years ago where Macs were grabbing the whole class c
range when they received an IP via DHCP. I think the way Apple handles the
stack is just wrong. Any chance you have a v6 conflict or a proxy setting?
This isn't another of your April Fools' posts, is it!? :P
Sorry, Just have to Threadjack for a second.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Hanset, Philippe C phan...@utk.edu wrote:
This is on an open SSID with NetReg in the back end. No portal, no 802.1x.
Philippe
NetReg? Southwestern, or CMU? (I was heavily into NetReg Southwestern back
in the
We have had similar issues with our MacBooks. I have found that adding this to
the sysctl.conf and rebooting helps.
net.link.ether.inet.keep_announcements=0
Brad
Brad Katz | Information Technology Specialist
Arlington Heights School District 25
1200 South
11 matches
Mail list logo
