Cisco wlc 7.5 and PI 1.4

2013-08-01 Thread Hurt,Trenton W.
The mdns filtering is here... (Along with many new caveats) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn75.html https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-35177 -- PI 1.4 upgrade caveat Sent from my iPhone

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco wlc 7.5 and PI 1.4

2013-08-01 Thread Daniel Husand
On 01.08.2013 15:06, Andy Page wrote: “Please know that PI 1.4 is intended only for those who will be upgrading their WLC and MSE to 7.5.” It goes on to say that there is no upgrade path from 1.4 to 2.0 when it comes out in the Fall. Apparently it is not meant as a maintenance or successor

RE: XpressConnect...

2013-08-01 Thread Lee H Badman
Same same here- send it to Cloudpath, they will get the false positive dealt with. -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:43 PM To:

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WiSM-1 to WiSM-2 migration strategy....

2013-08-01 Thread Joe Roth
Hector, Our guys followed a similar process to what Dennis posted and the migration went fine. We went from 12.2(33)SXH8a to 12.2(33)SXJ2 on our 6500's. The way in which you configure the WiSM's/port channels is different. You don't actually configure the channels manually any more, you run

RE: XpressConnect...

2013-08-01 Thread Peter P Morrissey
To answer your second question, we do re-evaluate this ourselves periodically. Just about every OS can automatically get 802.1x working nowadays, but not securely. We use xpressconnect to limit the certificates that can be accepted to the valid certificates by name. This enforces the

RE: XpressConnect...

2013-08-01 Thread Turner, Ryan H
We currently use the Cloudpath enrollment service. We switched to EAP-TLS away from EAP-TTLS and given the complexity of certificate generation and installation of CA certs to support those personal certificates, I don’t expect we will be moving away from Cloudpath anytime, soon. It was too

Cisco VS. Aruba

2013-08-01 Thread Linchuan Yang
Dear All We are planning to upgrade our whole wireless network. Could you please comment based on your experience which one is better: 1. Cisco Prime Infrastructure VS. Aruba Airwave 2. Cisco ISE VS. Aruba ClearPass Thank you, and have a nice day. Yours, Linchuan Yang (Antony) Wireless

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco VS. Aruba

2013-08-01 Thread louvogelsr
Ruckus is better than either of the 2 choices listed. -Original Message- From: Linchuan Yang linchuan.y...@concordia.ca To: WIRELESS-LAN WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Sent: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 11:53 am Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco VS. Aruba Dear All We are planning to upgrade

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco VS. Aruba

2013-08-01 Thread Hanset, Philippe C
Lou, http://www.linkedin.com/pub/lou-vogel/10/a80/870 Here is the list etiquette: Promotional Messages and Advertising EDUCAUSE Constituent and Discussion Groups are educational in nature and not intended for promotional announcements, advertising, product-related press releases, or other

RE: XpressConnect...

2013-08-01 Thread Jason Cook
We haven't had any reports of it showing up as malware. While by default most OS's these days work very well, we still find inconsistencies within each OS and there's always a percentage of Windows/Mac OS machines particularly that don't just work with auto-config. Included drivers for Windows

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] XpressConnect...

2013-08-01 Thread Jeff Kell
On 8/1/2013 9:16 PM, Jason Cook wrote: We haven't had any reports of it showing up as malware. While by default most OS's these days work very well, we still find inconsistencies within each OS and there's always a percentage of Windows/Mac OS machines particularly that don't just work with