Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11k

2013-11-20 Thread Alan Nord
Looked into enabling this after a recent upgrade, but there is one major hurdle for my environment: This feature must be implemented only if you are using one controller. The assisted roaming feature is not supported across multiple controllers. See

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Fleming, Tony
I can tell you we use dot1x here with AD credentials and it doesn't lend itself to a good end-user experience. Our security policy requires password expiration after 60 days. When a student's password expires we see an increase of wireless related complaints (typically blaming the

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Turner, Ryan H
We have done a complete TLS deployment using both onboard cloudpath CA (for guest access) and Microsoft CA (for standard access). It takes some work, but it is well worth the effort. Feel free to contact me. We would be happy to help. Ryan H Turner Senior Network Engineer The University of

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Ian McDonald
Isn't that really a client supplicant issue though? You can send back a reason for authfailure, and then the client could prompt for a replacement password. -- ian -Original Message- From: Fleming, Tony Sent: 20-11-2013, 14:22 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re:

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11k

2013-11-20 Thread Dennis Xu
We have implemented it on all production WLANs for one month. There is only one issue: BlackBerry Z10 cannot connect to our 802.1X secure wlan, but it can connect to the open wlan. I tested in my lab and confirmed that Z10 can connect to the secure wlan without 802.11k. We are considering roll

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 7.5 Prime 1.4

2013-11-20 Thread Hurt,Trenton W.
Unable to access 5508 controller GUI with Google Chrome after upgrading to 7.5.102.0 - SSL Connection Error https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-38027 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Alan Nord Sent:

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11k

2013-11-20 Thread Jennifer Francis Wilson
FYI We're seeing 142 Blackberrys on our Wireless Networks. This is exactly 1% of the Wireless devices on our networks and compares to 51.55% which are Apple devices. (Using an updated OUI VendorMacs.xml list on Cisco PI 1.3 from http://www.macvendorlookup.com/) Regards, Jen. -Original

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 7.5 Prime 1.4

2013-11-20 Thread Vlade Ristevski
That bug hit us hard since we depend on webauth. We upgraded to a more recent 7.5. code but then hit another bug: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuj59101 On rare occasions, the Cisco Aironet series Access Point crashes and reboots due to corruption of a certain data-structure used to

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Coehoorn, Joel
rantWhat I really want to provide is an HTTPS-like experience for my users that just works: an SSL layer that doesn't care who you are, but still provides meaningful encryption for the last 50 meters where your traffic is moving through the air for anyone nearby to snoop. I'm annoyed that so many

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Curtis K. Larsen (UIT-Network)
I wonder if this might be closer to what you are looking for: http://theruckusroom.typepad.com/files/dynamic-psk-fs.pdf It definitely looks interesting. -Curtis Larsen From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Curtis, Bruce
I have been to hotels that use WPA2 for their wifi. You get an id and password at checkin, sometimes the id and password is tied to the room and not unique for every customer over time. While you can’t quite get the eduroam experience without a valid userid and password you could

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Turner, Ryan H
I agree with a lot you said. Philippe Hanset had mentioned 'unathenticated TLS', which appears to do what you want to do, but it appears it isn't very well supported yet.I haven't found much on it. Ryan H Turner Senior Network Engineer The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CB

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11k

2013-11-20 Thread Curtis, Bruce
On Nov 19, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Mike Albano mike.alb...@unlv.edu wrote: Curious if others have enabled 802.11k and if doing so has resulted in any client connectivity issues for clients that do not support it. Also, for the Cisco shops, the same question for non-802.11k assisted roamingie

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 7.5 Prime 1.4

2013-11-20 Thread mike . albano
Seeing this as well on our captive-portal SSID. Will be attempting the work-around shortly.MIkeUNLV-The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU wrote: -To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUFrom: Vlade Ristevski vrist...@ramapo.eduSent by: The

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Curtis, Bruce
On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Curtis K. Larsen (UIT-Network) curtis.k.lar...@utah.edu wrote: I wonder if this might be closer to what you are looking for: http://theruckusroom.typepad.com/files/dynamic-psk-fs.pdf It definitely looks interesting. -Curtis Larsen Aerohive also has

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Turner, Ryan H
My problem with these approaches is their proprietary nature. I wonder how this has been addressed/discussed in the IEEE groups... Ryan H Turner Senior Network Engineer The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CB 1150 Chapel Hill, NC 27599 +1 919 445 0113 Office +1 919 274 7926 Mobile

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Turner, Ryan H
Not to mention, these are still authentication AND encryption mechanisms, not just encryption. I think the original poster was wanting just an encryption method without the authentication. This doesn't really solve that. Ryan H Turner Senior Network Engineer The University of North Carolina

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] BlackBerry Z10 issue with 802.1x authentication

2013-11-20 Thread Dennis Xu
As I mentioned in another thread, this issue was caused by the implementation of 802.11k support. We are using Cisco WISM2s version 7.4.110.0. Dennis - Original Message - From: Dennis Xu d...@uoguelph.ca To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 1:27:58 PM

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Mike King
My Bad. I guess the Wi-FI alliance branded it Hotspot 2.0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotspot_(Wi-Fi)#Hotspot_2.0 On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Mike King m...@mpking.com wrote: You mean, something like 802.11u? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11u On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:18

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs web-portal

2013-11-20 Thread Mike King
You mean, something like 802.11u? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11u On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Turner, Ryan H rhtur...@email.unc.eduwrote: Not to mention, these are still authentication AND encryption mechanisms, not just encryption. I think the original poster was wanting