Yes we do.
-Curtis
On Fri, July 22, 2016 8:20 am, Frans Panken wrote:
> Hi Curtis, Eriks,
>
> A bit off-topic but I plucked up the courage to aks you anyway: do you
> also use this solution to place clients who misbehave (or likely have
> viruses, malware) in quarantaine?
>
> -Frans
>
>
> Op
We recently went the other way. Primarily because while firewalling off
things like AD and fileservers worked, the client behavior if they also
can't look up the name is improved. The simplest solution to give the guest
network an "outside" view of DNS was just to point them outside. Our
existing
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 03:41:17PM +0100, Paul Seward wrote:
> On 22 July 2016 at 15:24, Matthew Newton wrote:
> >
> > We've been using an in-house perl module[0] to manage the APs with
> > SNMP and do this for all new APs without any issue.
>
> That looks significantly
Thank you Matthew. SNMP sounds like a great alternative too!
-H
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Seward
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 9:41 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:07:22PM +, Hector J Rios wrote:
> But moving an AP to a new group requires a reboot.
Interestingly, if you change AP group with SNMP, it just moves
over without a reboot of the AP being required.
We've been using an in-house perl module[0] to manage the APs with
Hi Curtis, Eriks,
A bit off-topic but I plucked up the courage to aks you anyway: do you
also use this solution to place clients who misbehave (or likely have
viruses, malware) in quarantaine?
-Frans
Op 19/07/16 om 17:09 schreef Curtis K. Larsen:
> Nice slides. This is pretty similar to what
I just wanted to share information that I feel might be relevant to some of
you. In the Cisco wireless solution, it has always bothered me the fact that
newly installed APs get associated to the default-group AP group. This, by
default, will announce the first 16 WLANs in your controller. It is
Thank you Bruce! That’s very disappointing to hear. Jerry did show me records
that show the IPv6 address, and I’ve been able to find some (very few) that
contain the IPv6 address, but it is very inconsistent. For IPv4, I have not
seen any issues. All of my records correctly map a user to a v4