We have Bridgewave in production but lately have been installing the
Ubiquiti AirFiber (AF24) product. Very reliable and inexpensive. Longest
link is about a kilometer.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Daniel Wurst wrote:
> We (Denison University) have been using Aruba
We are looking at using Ridesystems GPS app for our shuttle service. The riders
will access the app while they are on the shuttle bus. Apparently there is an
issue because they are riding along the edge of our wi-fi service out of our
buildings where the phones pick up the wi-fi but not enough
Brian,
We have pools of /22 /23/ and /24. We separate our pools from students
vs fac/staff (still on the same ssid). It may be ok to do /16. I know
that Aruba does a lot to prevent broadcast storms, but I feared the
overhead of one large segment might have on it. We also give students a
Currently on our Aruba installation we have created VLAN pools for different
portions of the network(Student, Academic, etc), these pools primarily consist
of /23 networks.
Bruce Entwistle
Network Manager
University of Redlands
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
The only real reason to segment these networks is to prevent broadcast
storms, and the wireless controllers tend to have built in broadcast
suppression rendering this harmless. I changed our main SSID from several
/22s to a single /16 a while ago to negate the need to keep adding more
subnets as
We have about 50 /24s. The Aruba controllers hash the MAC address and drop
users into one of the /24s. We are at about 5,000 daily users.
We have broadcasts and multicasts turned off for these wireless nets. We
don't use VLAN pools.
ajs
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Brian Helman
We are using several different sizes on our Cisco 8510 controllers equally
divided between our three MPLS areas, as follows:
9 - /16
9 - /19
6 - /22
6 - /23
3 - /24 - a small subnet for AppleTV devices that is going away within a month
Since we use the 10. address space for wireless, and
We are in the process of moving from a controllerless vendor to Aruba. Our
current design is very segmented, to keep wireless device broadcasts from
overwhelming the network and AP's (we had this problem back in 11g days).
Presently, we've limited segments to /23's (give or take). In your
I have to chime in on LigoWave- introduced to me by a gent that runs a company
that uses them all over London. Light, easy, cheap, intuitive, rugged.
https://www.ligowave.com/
Have half a dozen in use now here.
-Lee Badman
Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWDP, CWNA, CWSP, Mobility+)
Bruce Entwistle wrote:
> We have been running a pair of Bridgewave GE60 units for several years to
> link to some remote buildings. We recently learned
> that these units are reaching/reached EOL, so it is time to begin looking at
> replacing this hardware. I was looking to see what
>others
Victoria Poncini wrote:
> Question: are you using radius proxies to front end controller auth requests
> to a Load balancer that sits in front of the Radius
> backend servers? Is the problem the bottleneck at the wlan controllers or the
> Radius servers regarding concurrent loading?
We do not
We were seeing the issue especially with Cisco switches with DHCP Snooping &
Dynamic ARP Inspection.
When the client first authenticates, the switch sends an Accounting start, but
it does not yet have the Framed-IP Address. The switch later sends an Interim
Update that includes the
12 matches
Mail list logo