If there is a powered light poll nearby it might still be a site you could
consider for your AP. You’ve said that ownership would sometimes be an issue
but they would give a high vantage point that could be beneficial to the bridge
link but would also serve a wider area. I would also be
I’m assuming the bus stops have power for lighting? If so, have you considered
using it as the power source? Even if you don’t own then, renting power from
this is probably less money than the solar install and the long-term maint.
For solar, my guess is you want solar charging with a battery
The backhaul would be 5Ghz Mesh with 1 Hop to the root AP. For this proof
of concept 2.4Ghz is good for users but I would be looking to us 5GHz for
both in the future with a Cisco AP that do FRA.
-Jimmy
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Paul Reimer wrote:
> We aren’t running
We aren’t running anything on solar.
I have a question though. What’s your backhaul? Are you thinking of bridging to
the bus stops?
-Paul
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James Helzerman
Sent: Tuesday, July
Has anyone used or currently have any access points powered by solar
panels? I am looking at doing a few proof of concepts at some bus stops to
try and provide connectivity for those waiting for the bus. I am
interested with the following particular questions but please add any
comments or
I'm a fan of Netinsight (aka Rasa) from Aruba. We get some very useful and
actionable data that we haven't seen before. I think they are very close to
official launch.
Recommend looking at them.
David Morton
Director, Networks & Telecommunications
Services: wired, mobile, telecom, HuskyTV,
Yes, I meant EAP-TTLS with PAP ☺
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Cappalli, Tim (Aruba
Security)
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 12:27 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
Hi Jason,
No comments, but Nyansa and Cape (another hardware-based wifi monitoring
company, but perhaps US-only since they use T-Mobile uplinks?) are at Mobility
Field Day 2 this week. You’ve reminded me to take another look at 7Signal
though; per Caston’s post, we already have a solution that
The problem with this statement:
EAP-PEAP/EAP-TTLS, if properly onboarded, are very secure. But the
problem is ‘properly onboarded’.
… is that even having PEAP or EAP-TTLS enabled on the network exposes you to
risk regardless of the supplicant configuration as anyone can attempt to
There are flaws with every mechanism. We are a long time EAP-TLS shop.
In a university environment, access is rarely as difficult thing. There are
many buildings and methods for motivated individuals to get access. Most of us
actually provide some level of access to guests, already. In
Hi Jason,
Full disclosure: My company was one of the first resellers of 7Signal. We are
also an early reseller of Nyansa. I have taken every precaution to make this
informative with an iota of "vendor speak". (If I've failed in any way, my
apologies in advance and I will ban myself from ever
Don’t have experience with Nyansa, have experience with 7signal.
IMO nothing beats 7signal in the radio / spectrum part of their *Wi-Fi*
performance monitoring. It appears to me that this is the key difference.
Regards, Kees
On 25 Jul 2017, at 09:02, Jason Cook
Hi All,
There's been plenty of positives mentioned about Nyansa in recent discussions.
I'm wondering if anyone out there has experience at both 7signal and Nyansa or
any other systems that do wireless monitoring/alerting in a more detailed way
than vendor provided gear. The approach for these
13 matches
Mail list logo