Tim -
Have you examined the performance data the AP collects about each client
connection which is stored in the Mobility Conductor (fka MM)?
What does the Client Health metric tell you about each device?
Are you aware of the CLI commands you can execute on the MM/AP to look at
VERY detailed
Curious if the high mem utilization correlates to client count? (Both
assoc and unassoc)
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:38 AM Jonathan Oakden
wrote:
> Not sure as yet as we have been too busy to get this over to TAC at the
> moment since we identified the problem and came across this bug ID at the
I was curious so poked around. Somewhat off-topic, and FWIW - Washlava
appears to be a really small startup, so.
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/washlava
https://www.linkedin.com/company/washlava/people/
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:24 AM Lee H Badman <
So - truly thinking out loud...
1. To Tim's point on lack of identity, the unstated requirement that could
be chosen to be fulfilled or not - there would need to be post-connect,
post-activity monitoring such that "bad activity" could be detected,
mitigated, prevented. Anybody and any device
Couple of technical comments:
1. Unless the rate-limiting was somehow incorporated into the WiFi AP and
doing funny WiFi / L4 protocol trickery for the enforcement mechanism to
achieve rate limiting, the transmit rate from the AP to the Client should
be as fast as the negotiated/determined WiFi
> As mentioned on the page to download the NIST Zero Trust Network
> Architecture document
>
> "Zero trust focuses on protecting resources (assets, services, workflows,
> network accounts, etc.), not network segments, as the network location is
> no longer seen as the prime component to the
n turn requiring
consideration for security policy and network-level enforcement.
-- David Logan
Aruba Networks, CTO office
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:27 PM William Green
wrote:
> I don't believe the network is the appropriate place for security to be
> applied, but witnessing the carnage... I belie
This has been an entirely entertaining thread. (Not to diminish the
original poster’s sincerity)
Also, hearing the consultant’s logic would either be thought provoking or
thoroughly entertaining BS. Perhaps both!
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:25 PM GT Hill wrote:
> I knew someone was going to
Pondering... that implies that a heavyweight roaming event could change the
MAC.
If true, that implies the WiFi roaming architecture considerations is even
more critical unless change of MAC doesn’t matter to the overall system
design and app behavior (I.e multimedia activity while physically
