You are correct that Cisco is shipping N now, but the 1250 AP's are modular to accommodate any changes to the 802.11n draft that would require a radio modification. There are 6 external antennas on the box and they weigh about as much as a cinder block. They are not really good for ceiling mounting. I personally would wait until this technology is a bit more mature and they have sleeker AP's more along the lines of say the 1130 series. This should occur after the draft is ratified.
Mike ________________________________ From: Lee Weers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:42 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0 For wireless we currently have an Aruba 2400, and a HP WESM xl module. About a year ago I did a comparison (mostly on paper) of a campus wide deployment of Aruba, Trapeze, Procurve, Xirrus, Cisco, and Siemens. It came down to Procurve for several reasons. 1. It is very simple to setup and maintain. 2. It has supported 802.1x a lot easier than our Aruba deployment 3. It is the least expensive to maintain year over year (Lifetime warranty). The only reason why he is pushing Cisco is they are shipping N now, and he is concerned there will be a politically backlash from the students with the technology fee increase. My opinion is the students won't care if it is a/b/g or n. They just want wireless. ________________________________ From: Lee H Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:36 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0 Hi Lee- I would encourage an eyes-open, non-biased bake-off if you have no wireless now. Regardless of what APs you settle on, scrutinize the management component closely. You may end up with a whiz-bang WLAN, but if you become a slave to the management tool, you'll likely be looking for alternatives not too far down the road. The management component (and the hidden costs that you'd do well to ferret out before purchasing by grilling others who have gone before you), add a significant amount to your TCO. For us, we're seeing what early adopters have to say on 802.11n. Especially large schools with thousands of APs that also do 802.1x. You probably realize that 802.11n can impact your PoE and data wiring strategy, along with the number of APs, etc... Keep us posted as you proceed. Out of curiosity- did the push for Cisco by your supervisor come after a comparison with other vendors? Regards- Lee Lee H. Badman Wireless/Network Engineer Information Technology and Services Syracuse University 315 443-3003 ________________________________ From: Lee Weers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:25 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0 We are looking at a campus wide wireless deployment, and my supervisor is pushing for a complete Cisco 1252 with N draft 2.0 capability. We would have about a total of 250 to 300 AP's in full deployment. Our wired infrastructure is currently 100% Procurve with about 90% of it being 10/100 switched. I'd like to know what other schools are doing with 802.11n. Thank you, Lee Weers Assistant Director for Network Services Central College IT Services (641) 628-7675 ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
