RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-15 Thread Frank Bulk
of Powerdsine. -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Cantin Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:10 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Midspans have been available

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-14 Thread Frank Bulk
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users At the time there weren't any midspans released that would provide the full 20 watts of power required by the 1252. It will run off of the standard 802.3af power, but then you only get a 1x3 rather than the 2x3 capabilities. -Original

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-14 Thread Tim Cantin
Midspans have been available for several months now -- when were you looking? From http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps6973/ps8382/pro d_qas0900aecd806b7c82.html : Q. Will third-party Power over Ethernet mid-span devices be able to consistently power the Cisco Aironet

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-14 Thread Jeffrey Sessler
When I went looking for midspans back in June/July, there was only one that actually supported the required Cisco signaling to enable high-power mode on the AP. The midspan is/was the PhiHong POE125U-4HP four port unit. The other midspans required a dongle at the AP to split the power back off

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Lee Weers
, November 11, 2008 4:09 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users We are running 11n in 2.4 GHz on the 1252's, but only at 20MHz. 40MHz in 2.4 MHz seems like a very bad idea because of the lack of non-overlapping channels. As for range, the building I'm

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Peter P Morrissey
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Weers Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:53 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users As far as the range is concerned we do get a greater range with the 1252's. I can't say we use this as a feature, because we didn't have a lot

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Lee Weers
Morrissey Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 9:58 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Thanks for sharing that. Have you ever considered midspan devices for when you need more than a handful of bricks? http://www.microsemi.com/powerdsine/Products

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Greg Gardner
, Greg Gardner -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Weers Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:53 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users As far as the range

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Toivo Voll
A lot depends on what kind of construction your building is -- brick, concrete and concrete block is entirely different from drywall and open spaces. The other aspect is your definition of full coverage. If you want the location functionality to work, you need much higher density and different

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Lee H Badman
more based in reality. Lee -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Gardner Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:05 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Barber, Matt
- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:31 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Hi Greg- The square-footage models scare me, quite

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Dan McCarriar
. Thanks, Greg Gardner -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Weers Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:53 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users As far

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-12 Thread Barber, Matt
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan McCarriar Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:03 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users We use PowerDSine also (including the 24-port model) with our Aruba AP

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Lee H Badman
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Weers Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 1:02 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users We have 6 4404 controllers running 375 1252's

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Barber, Matt
Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 1:36 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Thanks, Lee. If you prefer to do off list, can I call you? If you are good

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Jamie Savage
Hi, I would be very interested if this subject discussion was kept open to the group. We just turned on an 11a/b/g/n service using a single Cisco 4402 with 16 APs (soon to expand to the max 50 APs a single 4402 will allow. It covers a residence, so it's not a high density area nor would I expect a

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Jeffrey Sessler
Five 4404 with 230 1252s deployed (all have 2.4 5 radios) with the goal of reaching 350+ in January. Running Cisco's 5.1 code base. 5GHz running with 40Mhz wide channels. We went live September 1st with the bulk of the 1252s deployed in our residential halls. So far, I'd say that the

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Jim Glassford
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 11, 2008 11:50 AM *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Wondering if anyone has jumped in to Cisco 11n yet on any sort of scale that they wouldn’t mind sharing? Especially where 11n APs and a/g APs are hosted on the same

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Barber, Matt
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Glassford Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 2:53 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Greetings, Nothing cutting edge but all seems to be working a OK. (5) 4404s and (1) 4402 all running 4.2.130.0 and same mobility

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Lee H Badman
Of Barber, Matt Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 3:07 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Anyone running 11n in the 2.4 GHz on the 1252s? 20 or 40MHz? What kind of range from the APs are you seeing? Matt Barber Network Analyst / PC Support

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Johnson, Bruce T
, November 11, 2008 2:40 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Five 4404 with 230 1252s deployed (all have 2.4 5 radios) with the goal of reaching 350+ in January. Running Cisco's 5.1 code base. 5GHz running with 40Mhz wide channels. We went live

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Johnson, Bruce T
characteristics. --Bruce Johnson -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 3:59 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Jeffrey Sessler
Glassford Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 2:53 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users Greetings, Nothing cutting edge but all seems to be working a OK. (5) 4404s and (1) 4402 all running 4.2.130.0 and same mobility group (83) AP1252 (has one

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 11n users

2008-11-11 Thread Jamie Savage
should have mentioned that we're using 1252s to provide a/b/g/nJJames SavageYork UniversitySenior Communications Tech.108 Steacie Building[EMAIL PROTECTED]4700 Keele Streetph: 416-736-2100 ext. 22605Toronto, Ontariofax: 416-736-5701M3J 1P3, CANADA -The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues