ESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless and Apple Clients
Marcelo,
Perhaps I’m missing something, but before the change 60% were 2.4GHz 11g and
30% were N (5GHz). Where were the other 10%?
David
David Morton
Director, Mobile Communications
University of Was
-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of David R. Morton
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 2:07 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless and Apple Clients
Marcelo,
Perhaps I'm missing something, but before the change 60% were 2.4GHz 11g and
30% were N (5GHz). Where wer
lf Of Hanset, Philippe C
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:48 AM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless and Apple Clients
Mark,
Sounds Familiar...
We have AP-125., n+1 architecture, running 5GHz in HT, 2.4 in H
Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hanset, Philippe C
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:48 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless and Apple Clients
Mark,
Sounds Familiar...
We have AP-125., n+1 architecture, running 5GHz in
I think the answer is already there... For band steering to be effective, your
5Ghz deployment needs to be at an appropriate density. If you're AP placement
was designed for coverage in 2.4Ghz, then there may be many gaps in the 5GHz
space. Clients who then operated AOK in 2.4Ghz may now be in l
_
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Ryan Holland
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:13 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless and Apple Clients
Mark,
Enabling band stee
While this isn't the most elegant of solutions; perhaps this situation
is much like in years past where the lower data rates were turned off
in order to improve roaming, would it be possible to disable some of
the lower data rates on the 5Ghz range and possibly help with the
client choosing 2.4
Mark,
Enabling band steering results in about 8 association requests from a
5GHz-capable client to a 2.4Ghz radio being rejected. Since you had that
enabled but 5GHz coverage was poor, it seems explainable why the mac had
difficulty connecting. In one of these problem areas, you can run this co
We run Meru and no band steering but this may help. We have Mac clients that
will connect to an AP that is definitely not the best AP to connect to. I
think that there may be some sort of caching of network access that Mac is
doing to try and speed up connections some how like it is doing with
Mark,
Sounds Familiar...
We have AP-125., n+1 architecture, running 5GHz in HT, 2.4 in HT but not
channel bonding.
We have enabled spectrum load balancing and disabled band steering.
Seems to work fine.
Philippe Hanset
Univ. of TN
On Sep 15, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Mark H. Wehrle wrote:
Hi all,
10 matches
Mail list logo
