Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP stress test (vendor agnostic)

2013-02-08 Thread Luke Jenkins
Yes, me too. It is unfortunate that it took that much effort. J >> >> Pete M. >> >> >> >> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: >> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP stress test (vendor agnostic)

2013-02-07 Thread Jeffrey Sessler
ues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Sessler Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 4:43 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP stress test (vendor agnostic) Well, they did learn that they shouldn't be r

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP stress test (vendor agnostic)

2013-02-07 Thread Tristan Rhodes
06, 2013 4:43 PM > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP stress test (vendor agnostic) > > ** ** > > Well, they did learn that they shouldn't be recommending their clients > stick with 20MHz in 5GHz. Made me laugh. :) > >

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP stress test (vendor agnostic)

2013-02-06 Thread Peter P Morrissey
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP stress test (vendor agnostic) Well, they did learn that they shouldn't be recommending their clients stick with 20MHz in 5GHz. Made me laugh. :) Jeff >>> On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 at 7:29 AM, in message >>> <511284df02840002f..

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP stress test (vendor agnostic)

2013-02-06 Thread Jeffrey Sessler
Well, they did learn that they shouldn't be recommending their clients stick with 20MHz in 5GHz. Made me laugh. :) Jeff >>> On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 at 7:29 AM, in message >>> <511284df02840002f...@gwiahsl1.avans.nl>, Kees Pronk >>> wrote: All, This is a must read imho: http:/