RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-29 Thread Lee H Badman
of Jeffrey Sessler [j...@scrippscollege.edu] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 11:11 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? I'm surprised that anyone is still trying to block bittorrent. It's never 100%, and at our campus we found

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan Kronawithleitner
: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? We have been running 8.0.100.0 across 5 WLC 5508's for all of our undergrad Resnet buildings (mix of AP702W's, AP3602's) since 2014 September. The rate of user complaints about WLAN service in Resnet has been low. As a result

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-23 Thread Alan Klein
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? MR1 landed… http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn80mr1.html If there are no mayor complaints from early adopters, this is the release I will move my controllers

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-23 Thread Lee H Badman
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? Sort of reminds me of the Mission Impossible opening theme. How long will you all let that fuse burn before you pull the trigger? On Dec 23, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu wrote: So far

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-23 Thread Christina Klam
Klein akl...@osisecure.com Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 12:17 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? Sort of reminds me of the Mission Impossible opening theme. How long will you all let that fuse burn before you pull the trigger

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-23 Thread Pete Hoffswell
: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 12:08 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? So far, so good on my end. Lee Badman Wireless/Network Architect ITS, Syracuse University

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-15 Thread Lee H Badman
Rugelis Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 8:35 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? We have been running 8.0.100.0 across 5 WLC 5508's for all of our undergrad Resnet buildings (mix of AP702W's, AP3602's) since 2014 September

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-14 Thread Dexter Caldwell
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? Dexter, Shame to hear you had those issues. We have been running 8.0.100 without issue since basically it became available. No random reboots or anything along those lines. My opinion the matter

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-08 Thread Lee H Badman
Supposedly MR1 out “mid-December” as recommended stability code (is what I’ve been told). Is our plan to go to it. Lee Badman Wireless/Network Architect ITS, Syracuse University 315.443.3003 (Blog: http://wirednot.wordpress.com) From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-08 Thread Hector J Rios
We just upgraded to 7.6.130 and has been stable. We are planning to wait a little longer before we consider moving to 8.0. Not sure we will venture to deploy it for the Spring semester. Regards, Hector Rios Louisiana State University From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-08 Thread Danny Eaton
/CSCur79302 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 4:08 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-08 Thread Alexandre Adao
Hello, Last month, I have moved 7.0.43.32 to 8.0.100.0. I had some challenges with iOS devices only (iPhones and iPads). The splash page wound not automatically prompted for authentication once you choose the wireless SSID. I found that I have to apply the command config network web-auth

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-08 Thread Dexter Caldwell
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Danny Eaton Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 5:17 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? We’re running 7.6.130.0 in HA in non-VSS 6503 Sup-720/3C chassis, and have come across a bug. It’s documented, and we’re working

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go?

2014-12-08 Thread Christopher Michael Allison
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU on behalf of Dexter Caldwell dexter.caldw...@furman.edu Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 4:57 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 8.0.100.0 GO or No Go? I’m running the 8.0.100.0 code in production. I’d say for now it’s