Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Problems with Cisco Work Group Bridges

2009-06-25 Thread Rick Brown
LESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Problems with Cisco Work Group Bridges Is is possible that because these are construction sites that power is being interrupted or that you're having line of sight issues where cranes, cement trucks, etc. are disrupting your rf path? I&

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Problems with Cisco Work Group Bridges

2009-06-25 Thread Procyk, Ian
day -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Brown Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 9:31 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Problems with Cisco Work

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Problems with Cisco Work Group Bridges

2009-06-25 Thread Jim Glassford
Greetings Ian, Probably no relation to your problem, but on WLC version 4.2.130.0 and a WGB 1242 running 12.4(10b)JA3 I had problems keeping the WGB online. Would log on the WGB: " %DOT11-4-UPLINK_DOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, parent lost: Received deauthenticate (2) not valid " and it would g

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Problems with Cisco Work Group Bridges

2009-06-25 Thread Johnson, Bruce T
Ian, Apart from the possible RF causes mentioned (you can try running a dot11 linktest against the root/parent mac). 1. Is the Aironet IE enabled on the SSID? What about "dot11 extension aironet" on the AP interface? 2. Is the bridge setup as a mobile station (under d0/1 interface)? This is th

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Problems with Cisco Work Group Bridges

2009-06-25 Thread Rick Brown
Is is possible that because these are construction sites that power is being interrupted or that you're having line of sight issues where cranes, cement trucks, etc. are disrupting your rf path? I'd like to think that you've already considered these, but sometimes we tend to look past the obvi