: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wi-Fi 6E Branding Rant
I concur - it's a messy situation, and one that's not made any better by the
likes of AT (5Ge anyone?). If I had a nickel for everyone that thought that
5Ge was 5G and/or that Wi-Fi 6 was 6GHz, I'd have a whole ton of nickels... I'm
not sure that Wi-Fi 7
Main Office
>
> 919.539.2726 Mobile/text
>
> [image: CAD LOGO EMAIL SIG]
>
>
>
> *From:* Green, William C
> *Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2021 6:52 PM
> *Subject:* Wi-Fi 6E Branding Rant
>
>
>
>
>
> "Wi-Fi 6E” is not a good branding for what 6GHz pro
> it’s a tough challenge. It *is* still WiFi 6 (802.11ax) so WiFi 7 would be
> confusing.
I would argue that the whole point of the "5, 6, 7" branding was to make it
easier for consumers to understand if their gear will interoperate. In that
respect, I think the added channels absolutely
lt;http://www.cadinc.com/>
j...@cadinc.com<mailto:j...@cadinc.com>
919.460.1313 Main Office
919.539.2726 Mobile/text
From: Green, William C
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 6:52 PM
Subject: Wi-Fi 6E Branding Rant
"Wi-Fi 6E” is not a good branding for what 6GHz provides, in my personal
opini
Inc.
www.cadinc.com<http://www.cadinc.com/>
j...@cadinc.com<mailto:j...@cadinc.com>
919.460.1313 Main Office
919.539.2726 Mobile/text
[CAD LOGO EMAIL SIG]
From: Green, William C
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 6:52 PM
Subject: Wi-Fi 6E Branding Rant
"Wi-Fi 6E” is not a good branding f
"Wi-Fi 6E” is not a good branding for what 6GHz provides, in my personal
opinion. I hope the Wi-Fi Alliance reconsiders.
I've been discussing Wi-Fi 6E in my organization for over a year-- and nobody
can keep that “E” in their heads. They constantly confuse "Wi-Fi 6" as the
same as "Wi-Fi
