Do any of the bands have lesser/no DFS requirements? If so, those are will
be more attractive.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:32 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to
None that I'm aware of - the only one of particular concern (and only in
Europe), is the 5.470-5.725 band since it's required there to run .11h
to ensure no interference with their aircraft radar systems.
Frankly, the only place you'd see this is in an airport in Europe and
the only device that
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jon Freeman wrote:
As higher level standards in 802.11 call for more AP control, this will
become more valuable in ensuring less co-channel interference across
heterogeneous environments. But, it will also mean less need for IT
intervention as the access device will make
Interesting TechWorld article on an aspect of 802.11n rollout that I hadn't
seen discussed before.
http://tinyurl.com/2ebpd4
Tom Zeller
Indiana University
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at
Remember, it's in Extricom's interest to demonstrate a scarcity of channels
(less channel choice = more co-channel interference) because they have a
coordinated RF approach.
While the second-generation of 802.11n draft 2.0 chips from Atheros deals
with some of DFS challenges, I was led to
