RE: Eapol-Rate-Optimization

2013-12-05 Thread Osborne, Bruce W (Network Services)
Are you sure the CRL server is accessible from the client? Turning off that 
check sound like added security risk.

From: Marcelo Lew [mailto:marcelo@du.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Eapol-Rate-Optimization

We also tried EAPOL-rate-opt.  It did help with the Mac roaming issue, but it 
adds too much overhead and affects throughput quite a bit.  We are on 6.3.1.1, 
and I still see the issue (testing on Macbook running Mavericks).  Only fix 
that worked (per user fix) for us, is unchecking OCSP and CRL under 
keychain/preferences/certificates.


Marcelo

Marcelo Lew
Wireless Network Architect  Engineer
University Technology Services
University of Denver
Desk: (303) 871-6523
Cell: (303) 669-4217
Fax:  (303) 871-5900
Email: m...@du.edumailto:m...@du.edu

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeff Kell
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 7:44 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Eapol-Rate-Optimization

On 12/3/2013 9:34 PM, Wright, Don wrote:
   Just curious, have any Aruba shops tried enabling EAPOL rate optimization 
to try helping with the Apple roaming/dropping issue?  It's a new setting in 
6.1 and while it didn't help in my testing, I've heard others have had success 
with it.  Would someone care to update with details?

We have had issues with MacOS devices and roaming.  Three variables were 
suggested - OKC, PMKID, and EAPOL-rate-opt.

We had OKC / PMKID both enabled, no EAPOL-rate-opt, and interval between ID 
requests at 30 seconds.  Wandering around a well-covered building with a MacOS 
laptop pinging a fixed target and it would disassociate / reassociate / 
reauthenticate with significant delay in between; Windows laptop did not have 
this issue (maybe drop a packet or two between roaming targets).  We tried 
disabling OKC by itself, but it seemed to make no difference.  This was 
discussed on the list before so I'll not repeat the whole issue.

We tried the EAPOL-rate-opt, and we would drop a handful of pings, but 
essentially keep a connection intact.  So yes, it did appear to help.  It's not 
100% still (is anything wireless ever 100%?) but was a solid improvement over 
the previous case.

We're still grabbing at straws to improve the mobility, and hoping perhaps 
the sticky client voodoo in 6.3 might help the issue as well.

Jeff
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: Eapol-Rate-Optimization

2013-12-05 Thread Marcelo Lew
Yes on both.
It is unclear to me however why a Mac would check crl when roaming between 
WAPs.  Seems like a bug to me.

[email signature]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W 
(Network Services)
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 7:20 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Eapol-Rate-Optimization

Are you sure the CRL server is accessible from the client? Turning off that 
check sound like added security risk.

From: Marcelo Lew [mailto:marcelo@du.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Eapol-Rate-Optimization

We also tried EAPOL-rate-opt.  It did help with the Mac roaming issue, but it 
adds too much overhead and affects throughput quite a bit.  We are on 6.3.1.1, 
and I still see the issue (testing on Macbook running Mavericks).  Only fix 
that worked (per user fix) for us, is unchecking OCSP and CRL under 
keychain/preferences/certificates.


Marcelo

Marcelo Lew
Wireless Network Architect  Engineer
University Technology Services
University of Denver
Desk: (303) 871-6523
Cell: (303) 669-4217
Fax:  (303) 871-5900
Email: m...@du.edumailto:m...@du.edu

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeff Kell
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 7:44 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Eapol-Rate-Optimization

On 12/3/2013 9:34 PM, Wright, Don wrote:
   Just curious, have any Aruba shops tried enabling EAPOL rate optimization 
to try helping with the Apple roaming/dropping issue?  It's a new setting in 
6.1 and while it didn't help in my testing, I've heard others have had success 
with it.  Would someone care to update with details?

We have had issues with MacOS devices and roaming.  Three variables were 
suggested - OKC, PMKID, and EAPOL-rate-opt.

We had OKC / PMKID both enabled, no EAPOL-rate-opt, and interval between ID 
requests at 30 seconds.  Wandering around a well-covered building with a MacOS 
laptop pinging a fixed target and it would disassociate / reassociate / 
reauthenticate with significant delay in between; Windows laptop did not have 
this issue (maybe drop a packet or two between roaming targets).  We tried 
disabling OKC by itself, but it seemed to make no difference.  This was 
discussed on the list before so I'll not repeat the whole issue.

We tried the EAPOL-rate-opt, and we would drop a handful of pings, but 
essentially keep a connection intact.  So yes, it did appear to help.  It's not 
100% still (is anything wireless ever 100%?) but was a solid improvement over 
the previous case.

We're still grabbing at straws to improve the mobility, and hoping perhaps 
the sticky client voodoo in 6.3 might help the issue as well.

Jeff
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image001.jpg

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards

2013-12-05 Thread T. Shayne Ghere
Just a thought.



Is anyone using a different certificate other than Globalsign with their
ACS server?  If you’re successful in using the certificates on all Windows
8/8.1pro machines, could you please let me know what certificate you’re
using?



We’re using GeoTrust Global CA and GeoTrust DV SSL on our ACS server, and
I’m wondering if this is the root cause of it not working.  We have to
install the certificates manually when getting on our secure network and
since Globalsign is already installed, I’m wondering if this might be the
problem.



Thanks again!

Shayne



*From:* T. Shayne Ghere [mailto:sgh...@fsmail.bradley.edu]
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 04, 2013 1:48 PM
*To:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
*Subject:* RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards



Has anyone seen people upgrading their Windows 7 computers to Windows 8 or
8.1 and the wireless breaks completely?   That’s what I’m seeing here with
the Broadcom and some Atheros cards.



I’ve been working on this since Monday (solid) and cannot get any Broadcom
wlan cards to connect with Windows 8 or 8.1pro, but if I re-image the
computer to Windows 7 pro, it works just fine.



We are a complete Cisco shop with about 500 1142N AP’s and 128 1231, 1232
and 1251 AP’s so unless we replace the 1200’s we’re stuck at the 7.0.253.5
code (which is supposed to fix it).  But that’s not what we’re seeing if
they’re upgrading their computers.   All the new computers are working just
fine that come pre-installed with Windows 8.  Upgrade to 8.1pro and that’s
the gotcha we’re seeing too.



Thanks for all the suggestions, but I’ve shelved the Broadcom chipset as a
“Won’t work on our wireless network” if you upgrade to 8.   Now moving on
to some of the others that are coming in.



Going to be fun after Christmas.   /ugh



Thanks

Shayne



*From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Lee H Badman
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 04, 2013 1:23 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards



During our opening, and after a Windows update on my own son’s machine at
the same time, we saw many cases where both WLAN adapter and chipset
drivers both had to be updated to connect to secure networks.



-Lee



*From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUWIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
*On Behalf Of *Michael Hulko
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 04, 2013 1:40 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards



Not necessarily related to Windows 8, but we have had the same issue with
Intel Centrino family chipsets.  We had the users upgrade the chipset to
the latest version available from Intel's site and that seemed to resolve
the issues.



Never rely on the user to tell you that they have updated the drivers



MH





On 2013-12-04, at 12:59 PM, Joe Roth wrote:



Shayne,

We have seen this as well. The instructions from the blog that Don posted
are essentially what we use. Our Help Desk has a flash drive with a pile of
wireless nic drivers that they keep handy.



On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Sullivan, Don dsulli...@samford.edu
wrote:

Here is what we did:



http://blogs.technet.com/b/dennis_schnell/archive/2013/08/31/windows-8-1-wifi-showing-quot-limitied-quot-or-quot-no-internet-access-quot.aspx



More specifically –

Here's the instructions:

# Open Device Manager (search Windows Help if you don't know what this is)

# Select 'Network adaptors' and then open (double-click) Broadcom 802.11n
Network Adaptor

# Go to the Driver tab and click the Update Driver... button

# Select 'Browse my computer for driver software'

# Select 'Let me pick from a list of device drivers on my computer'

# Select the Broadcom 802.11n Network Adaptor (Broadcom) entry from the
list, and click Next

We have had this occur at 3 times and this fixed the issue for us. Hope it
helps you.





*Don Sullivan*

*Network Adminstrator*

*Technology Services*



205-726-2111 | office

205-566-1432 | mobile

205-726-2524 | fax



dsulli...@samford.edu

www.samford.edu

800 Lakeshore Drive, Birmingham, AL
35229http://maps.google.com/maps?q=800+Lakeshore+Drive,+Birmingham,+AL+35229,+US



image001.png







*From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *T. Shayne Ghere
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 04, 2013 11:25 AM


*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards





Good morning,



I was wondering if any other school is having issues with the Broadcom
Wireless network cards running Windows 8/8.1 pro on a WPA2/AES network?  We
have students that are upgrading their Dell computers from Windows 7 to
Windows 8 and the cards stop working on our secure 

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards

2013-12-05 Thread Bruce Boardman
They have to accept the CERT for the RADIUS servers if they are auto 
configuring, but the verbiage about which server may be on a second page of the 
alert, which is likely ignored
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 1:06 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards

Lee,

Do the students have to install the certificate when authenticating, or to they 
just use their username/password and it's in there already?  I'm beginning to 
think Windows 8 is Vista all over again.

Thanks
Shayne

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:00 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards

GoDaddy here, working fine.

Lee H. Badman
Network Architect/Wireless TME
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] 
on behalf of T. Shayne Ghere 
[sgh...@fsmail.bradley.edumailto:sgh...@fsmail.bradley.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:57 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards
Just a thought.

Is anyone using a different certificate other than Globalsign with their ACS 
server?  If you're successful in using the certificates on all Windows 8/8.1pro 
machines, could you please let me know what certificate you're using?

We're using GeoTrust Global CA and GeoTrust DV SSL on our ACS server, and I'm 
wondering if this is the root cause of it not working.  We have to install the 
certificates manually when getting on our secure network and since Globalsign 
is already installed, I'm wondering if this might be the problem.

Thanks again!
Shayne

From: T. Shayne Ghere 
[mailto:sgh...@fsmail.bradley.edumailto:sgh...@fsmail.bradley.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 1:48 PM
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards

Has anyone seen people upgrading their Windows 7 computers to Windows 8 or 8.1 
and the wireless breaks completely?   That's what I'm seeing here with the 
Broadcom and some Atheros cards.

I've been working on this since Monday (solid) and cannot get any Broadcom wlan 
cards to connect with Windows 8 or 8.1pro, but if I re-image the computer to 
Windows 7 pro, it works just fine.

We are a complete Cisco shop with about 500 1142N AP's and 128 1231, 1232 and 
1251 AP's so unless we replace the 1200's we're stuck at the 7.0.253.5 code 
(which is supposed to fix it).  But that's not what we're seeing if they're 
upgrading their computers.   All the new computers are working just fine that 
come pre-installed with Windows 8.  Upgrade to 8.1pro and that's the gotcha 
we're seeing too.

Thanks for all the suggestions, but I've shelved the Broadcom chipset as a 
Won't work on our wireless network if you upgrade to 8.   Now moving on to 
some of the others that are coming in.

Going to be fun after Christmas.   /ugh

Thanks
Shayne

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 1:23 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards

During our opening, and after a Windows update on my own son's machine at the 
same time, we saw many cases where both WLAN adapter and chipset drivers both 
had to be updated to connect to secure networks.

-Lee

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael Hulko
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 1:40 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows 8 and Broadcom wireless cards

Not necessarily related to Windows 8, but we have had the same issue with Intel 
Centrino family chipsets.  We had the users upgrade the chipset to the latest 
version available from Intel's site and that seemed to resolve the issues.

Never rely on the user to tell you that they have updated the drivers

MH


On 2013-12-04, at 12:59 PM, Joe Roth wrote:

Shayne,

We have seen this as well. The instructions from the blog that Don posted are 
essentially what we use. Our Help Desk has a flash drive with a pile of 
wireless nic drivers that they keep handy.

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:50 

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11k

2013-12-05 Thread Frank Bulk (iname.com)
Note the distance between RIM's headquarters and Dennis's work.  =)

Frank

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ian McDonald
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:15 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11k

You have a lot of Z10s? A recent article described Blackberry as deader than 
paisley flares. I don't think I've even seen *one*. 

--
ian

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dennis Xu
Sent: 20 November 2013 14:57
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11k

We have implemented it on all production WLANs for one month. There is only one 
issue: BlackBerry Z10 cannot connect to our 802.1X secure wlan, but it can 
connect to the open wlan. I tested in my lab and confirmed that Z10 can connect 
to the secure wlan without 802.11k. We are considering roll back this change. 

---
Dennis Xu
Analyst 3, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services(CCS) University of Guelph

519-824-4120 Ext 56217
d...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs

- Original Message -
From: Alan Nord an...@macalester.edu
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:22:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11k


Looked into enabling this after a recent upgrade, but there is one major hurdle 
for my environment: This feature must be implemented only if you are using one 
controller. The assisted roaming feature is not supported across multiple 
controllers. See here for more detail. 



On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Mike Albano  mike.alb...@unlv.edu  wrote: 


Curious if others have enabled 802.11k and if doing so has resulted in any 
client connectivity issues for clients that do not support it. Also, for the 
Cisco shops, the same question for non-802.11k assisted roamingie config 
wlan assisted-roaming prediction {enable | disable} wlan-id 


Mike Albano 
Network Engineer 
UNLV 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/ . 





-- 

Alan Nord, CCNA 
Infrastructure Manager 
Information Technology Services 
Macalester College 
1600 Grand Avenue 
St. Paul, MN 55105 ** Participation and subscription information for 
this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.