Just curious how many on the list are going to the Wireless LAN Pro Conference
next week? Bruce Boardman and myself from Syracuse will be there- would be nice
to connect with our friends from other schools during the event.
-Lee
Lee Badman
Wireless/Network Architect
ITS, Syracuse University
I don't know, Bruce. The government has been very aggressive shutting down
every place in the US that sells proper jamming equipment. Even shutting down
individual craigslist retailers. What is easier for them to do? Tell Cisco
and Aruba and the other wireless players to disable and stop
Interesting, didn't even know there was such an event
Bob Brown
Online Executive Editor, News
T: 508.766.5418
LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/bobbrownboston | Twitter:
@alphadoggshttps://twitter.com/alphadoggs | Facebook
profilehttps://www.facebook.com/NetworkWorld | Google +
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Osborne, Bruce W (Network Services) wrote:
So, the current enterprise wireless systems are indeed illegal to sell
in the US.
And that's the important bit; FCC's reach does not extend outwith the US
and these features may legally be used in other territories, so just like
If it were that easy, the hotel could do the same thing.
Bruce Osborne
Network Engineer – Wireless Team
IT Network Services
(434) 592-4229
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
-Original Message-
From: Hunter Fuller [mailto:hf0...@uah.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: latest
You missed a part on the second page of the FCC link.
In addition, we reiterate that Federal law prohibits the operation, marketing,
or sale of any type
of jamming equipment, including devices that interfere with Wi-Fi, cellular, or
public safety
communications. Detailed information about the
The FCC specifically exempted university dormitories from the OTARD rules.
I believe we can prohibit the installation of antennas in dorm rooms, but
not family housing apartments.
https://www.fcc.gov/guides/over-air-reception-devices-rule
Here's something I wonder about. In some cases (T-Mobile for instance) the
WiFi network can be used as a substitute for the cellular network in order
to make calls. If I am preventing you from connecting to my WiFi network
via a password, am I 'jamming'? I think, according to this definition I
Here's something I wonder about. In some cases (T-Mobile for instance)
the WiFi network can be used as a substitute for the cellular network in
order to make calls. If I am preventing you from connecting to my WiFi
network via a password, am I 'jamming'? I think, according to this
definition I
Hi Bob-
It's an incredible event for people who do wireless. No sales, no vending, no
fluff. All how-to and real-world case studies from many of the absolute best in
the WLAN industry. For those of us in the business of WLAN, it's really one of
the best I've been to as far as take-away value.
If your campus charges a technology fee for access to the WiFi network,
and you aren't allowing personal access points, would the FCC consider
your actions no different than the hotels?
Jeff
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 9:06 AM, in message
Maybe a bit more advance notice on the list (if there was notice, I missed
it, that's for sure). I wanted to go last year, and couldn't because I
found out a week before. sniff
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
I am planning on attending the WLPC and am looking forward to talking about
edu issues.
Do we want to schedule a dinner event for Edu ?
/daniel/
daniel westacott
Networking and Telecommunications
University of Minnesota
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu wrote:
I see it another way - if the on-boarding to guest network is more
involved then what they have to do with the mi-fi, why bother? If the
guest network comes with an appropriate use agreement such as in a
captive portal, again, some may be put off by that. Last but not least,
if the guest network
It would be nice to have things like this posted to the listserv. I have to
say that one of the best resources besides this listserv of course has been
social media. (twitter mostly and blogs) Lots of very engaging conversations
regarding wifi happen all the time on twitter. Some of the
Sounds good to me
Bruce Boardman Networking Syracuse University 315 412-4156
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Daniel Westacott
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:15 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
https://supportforums.cisco.com/blog/12385701/cisco-access-point-models-not-supported-81-code
From this link it seems 8.1 code will do away with 1131s, 1240s, 1250s, and
1520s.
My question is what reduced feature set of 1140 access points mean.
Has anyone heard anything about what features are
Here is the story I know.
The AP's you listed including the 1140's were to be dropped in 8.0
code. The original 8.0 actually released as 7.6, and Cisco agreed to
support those AP's up to and including the new 8.0, but with no new
features, bug fixes, etc. Essentially, the 1252 radio code is the
18 matches
Mail list logo
