Shhh, we don't want people to find us.
73,
Jorj, AB3AG
On 12/02/2015 02:23 PM, Patrick Campbell wrote:
It looks like we have a Ham among us judging from the frequency range
and “S” signal level instead of dBm.
Pat, WA3UOE
J. Patrick Campbell
Wireless System Design Specialist
The
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:17:12PM +, Oliver Elliott wrote:
> The 7.6.x range was buggy as hell so I'm not surprised. Get off there asap!
Not as buggy as 7.4.x... we ran 7.6 for a year quite happily.
All Cisco software releases are buggy... just depends on whether
the bugs affect your
All Cisco software releases are buggy... just depends on whether the bugs
affect your particular environment :)
Amen to that, and will say "All software is buggy".
We're running 8.0.110.11 now for the past year or so, with no ill effects; with
WiSM-2 HA clusters.
-Original
We moved off that as soon as the 8.0.120.x was out. Make sure your AP's can
support 8.x code before you migrate to it. 95% of the issues we had on 7.4
and 7.6 went away once we moved to the new software.
If you're not running LAG, that will create problems in the 7.x software.
S
-Original
Thanks for the intel. I was told to wait for ISE 2.0 Patch 1 (which
will now be patch 2, because of that emergency patch).
Any other issues you are experiencing? Did you get the TACACS license
for it?
Thanks,
Jeff Obrizok
Marist College
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues
The 7.6.x range was buggy as hell so I'm not surprised. Get off there asap!
On 3 December 2015 at 16:15, John York wrote:
> After a year of pretty much rock solid behavior we’ve had two instances
> this week where EAP failed for some or all of the users on our WLC 5508
>
Jeff,
I have run into a bunch of other issues, I would say none are service impacting
like the ones I mentioned earlier. The rumor I heard is the second issue about
ciphers will be resolved in patch 2 and the plan is they will add the old
ciphers back in as they work through a long term plan.
After a year of pretty much rock solid behavior we’ve had two instances this
week where EAP failed for some or all of the users on our WLC 5508 (7.6.130.0).
For some users it uses EAP-PEAP-MSChapV2 to a Windows AD server running NPS.
For others it uses EAP-TLS to Cisco ACS. Both were
>> > After a year of pretty much rock solid behavior we’ve had two instances
>> > this week where EAP failed for some or all of the users on our WLC 5508
>
>In what way?
Clients just wouldn't connect. I didn't find anything in the WLC logs that
helped me, but probably I just didn't understand
Some days I’d prefer to be working with wave lengths measured in meters rather
than centimeters ;-)
-Neil, N0SFH
--
Neil Johnson
Network Engineer
The University of Iowa
Phone: 319 384-0938
Fax: 319 335-2951
E-Mail: neil-john...@uiowa.edu
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 6:43 AM, Jorj Bauer
What do you mean cm? The wavelength of 802.11g is .78 miles. You
should see the screwy ruler I use when positioning diversity antennas.
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of
11 matches
Mail list logo