I will be out of my office until Thursday September 14. If you have any
immediate concerns please email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Joseph Clark
Senior Network Engineer
IT, College of Charleston
(843) 953-3846
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
On Sep 10, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Philippe Hanset wrote:
Putting all the APs in the same L2 domain has been done before,
and I would
only recommend it for the smallest deployments. Broadcast
traffic, on the
wireless and the wireline side, will absolutely ruin performance,
as you
pointed out,
presentation documents to the list when they exist.
Ethan
Kind regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Ethan Sommer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September
06, 2006 2:08 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Linksys APs as enterprise
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Linksys APs as enterprise solution
Ethan,
I can't speak to how Meru handles L3 roaming, but I can tell you that
Aruba's L3 roaming method works quite well, and without any software
installed on the client.
Aruba handles the L3 roaming internally using a technique
A few of you have asked about measures that we have taken
to control broadcast. Here is a list:
First, some numbers:
We have today beween 20 and 60 packets per second
of Broadcast/Multicast, this is for a subnet that
has 950+ APs and up to 3000 concurrent users and growing, one layer 2
domain.
Philippe Hanset wrote:
:
-Enable P-node in WINS server, which limits Netbios traffic
P-mode must be enabled on the clients, since the NBNS (aka WINS server) is
a P-mode server by definition. If the clients listen to DHCP, however,
it's easy enough to set the client via the netbios-node-type
On Sep 11, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Philippe Hanset wrote:
It has been mentioned that devices with less potent CPUs
have a harder time to deal with big broadcast traffic.
(our Cisco SE likes to remind me about that. Is it to
sell a LWAPP system, or is it a fact?)
Um, I seem to recall huge subnets on
: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Linksys APs as enterprise solution
Putting all the APs in the same L2 domain has been done before, and I
would
only recommend it for the smallest deployments. Broadcast traffic, on the
wireless and the wireline side, will absolutely ruin performance, as you
pointed out, can
-Original Message-
From: Ethan Sommer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:08 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Linksys APs as enterprise solution
We have just deployed over 120 Linksys WRT54GLs in our dorms. So far,
everything
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:08 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Linksys APs as enterprise solution
We have just deployed over 120 Linksys WRT54GLs in our dorms. So far,
everything has been working well.
We used dd-wrt modified slightly
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:08 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Linksys APs as enterprise solution
We have just deployed over 120 Linksys WRT54GLs in our dorms. So far,
everything has been working well.
We used dd-wrt modified
: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:44 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Linksys APs as enterprise solution
All,
I'm polling the list about an idea that I would like to test
in our dormatories. If anyone has done a similar project out
there, would you mind sharing your
12 matches
Mail list logo
