Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment?
The following is from the briefing. It speaks to the advantage Cisco sees in the dual 5GHz radios. •Improves the Effective Spectrum Usage of the Cell •Micro-Radio •802.11ac Clients near the AP •High Performance Wi-Fi Clients at 802.11ac data rates •Excellent speed and performance •Macro-Radio •All legacy Clients join macro-cell •Future of wireless Jeff From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> on behalf of "McClintic, Thomas" <thomas.mcclin...@uth.tmc.edu<mailto:thomas.mcclin...@uth.tmc.edu>> Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 4:27 AM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? My understanding is that the two 5ghz radios will have required channel separation to prevent NCI. Time will tell of course… From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Atkins Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:08 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? I’m looking forward to the 2800/3800 AP features as we deploy new infrastructure and high density WiFi. I hopeful the external antenna model can help reduce the # of APs/licenses needed in very high density locations. The auto channel width could be nice if it works okay in our environment. Only time and testing will tell….. Not sure if multi-gig will be a factor in the coming year but we are certainly looking at it for the new Cisco and new Aruba APs. Our Aruba folks indicate two 5.2 GHz radios in the same antenna location will not work efficiently…. So we’re hoping there is some software magic to overcome physics. Needless to say I’m trying to keep my expectations low in order to be pleasantly surprised. There are a couple “No Strings Attached Show” podcasts discussing 2800/3800 and flexible radio assignment. (sponsored podcast) There is also a “Cisco Champion Radio” podcast discussing 2800/3800 features. PS. We are looking at 1810w for dorm deployment. It’s wave2 AC but still does not do clean air if you need that. Mike Atkins Network Engineer Office of Information Technology University of Notre Dame From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] On Behalf Of Daniel Brisson Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:46 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? Yes, the flexible radio design is definitely interesting. I’m interested to see how it plays out in terms of shuffling clients between APs based on what radio is available. I wanted to ask…have you considered the 702W for your res halls? It really seems to be the way to go in terms of creating small cells for the myriad devices that existing in that setting. We have a new dorm going up as well and with our experience with the 3502i’s, which grants has not been bad, but I really see the benefit of going with the 702w style. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:27 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? For the Cisco shops: I recently had a briefing on the new Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs coming in May, and I’m pretty excited for the new flexible radio design. For those that have not read up on it, in the new models one of the two radios can dynamically move (self optimize) between 2.4 and 5 GHz depending on need (coverage/performance) or function (Serve clients, security monitoring, service assurance aka be a client, or enhanced location). Seems like Cisco is addressing one of my long standing concerns/wishes, that when designing dense deployments, that the number of 2.4 GHz radios become overkill and wasted. The new model provides for much better 5 GHz coverage (lots of WAPs running 5GHz x 2) with just enough running 2.
RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment?
My understanding is that the two 5ghz radios will have required channel separation to prevent NCI. Time will tell of course… From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Atkins Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:08 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? I’m looking forward to the 2800/3800 AP features as we deploy new infrastructure and high density WiFi. I hopeful the external antenna model can help reduce the # of APs/licenses needed in very high density locations. The auto channel width could be nice if it works okay in our environment. Only time and testing will tell….. Not sure if multi-gig will be a factor in the coming year but we are certainly looking at it for the new Cisco and new Aruba APs. Our Aruba folks indicate two 5.2 GHz radios in the same antenna location will not work efficiently…. So we’re hoping there is some software magic to overcome physics. Needless to say I’m trying to keep my expectations low in order to be pleasantly surprised. There are a couple “No Strings Attached Show” podcasts discussing 2800/3800 and flexible radio assignment. (sponsored podcast) There is also a “Cisco Champion Radio” podcast discussing 2800/3800 features. PS. We are looking at 1810w for dorm deployment. It’s wave2 AC but still does not do clean air if you need that. Mike Atkins Network Engineer Office of Information Technology University of Notre Dame From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] On Behalf Of Daniel Brisson Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:46 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? Yes, the flexible radio design is definitely interesting. I’m interested to see how it plays out in terms of shuffling clients between APs based on what radio is available. I wanted to ask…have you considered the 702W for your res halls? It really seems to be the way to go in terms of creating small cells for the myriad devices that existing in that setting. We have a new dorm going up as well and with our experience with the 3502i’s, which grants has not been bad, but I really see the benefit of going with the 702w style. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:27 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? For the Cisco shops: I recently had a briefing on the new Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs coming in May, and I’m pretty excited for the new flexible radio design. For those that have not read up on it, in the new models one of the two radios can dynamically move (self optimize) between 2.4 and 5 GHz depending on need (coverage/performance) or function (Serve clients, security monitoring, service assurance aka be a client, or enhanced location). Seems like Cisco is addressing one of my long standing concerns/wishes, that when designing dense deployments, that the number of 2.4 GHz radios become overkill and wasted. The new model provides for much better 5 GHz coverage (lots of WAPs running 5GHz x 2) with just enough running 2.4 GHz to handle legacy needs. It’s going to make my life much easier when designing for our residential halls. Any of the other Cisco shops excited for the new flexible radio feature? Thoughts? I have a new residence hall coming online in August so the timing is great. Jeff ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.educause.edu_groups_=BQMFaQ=6vgNTiRn9_pqCD9hKx9JgXN1VapJQ8JVoF8oWH1AgfQ=rYfqH_8oTvcXxRxUI3x3m3Y7Nwgir7tnuoGbdZsrUM4=x9FmTibdGwK3Cj_ECA4y0TDBDvboo3FtydRorjvD5y4=rUvScK8mW64YuJe4N_TWOEqUt3oKYlwv237kQTYPw6A=>. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.educause.edu_groups_=BQMFaQ=6vgNTiRn9_pqCD9hKx9JgXN1VapJQ8JVoF8oWH1AgfQ=rYfqH_8oTvcXxRxUI3x3m3Y7Nwgir7tnuoGbdZsrUM4=x9FmTibdGwK3Cj_ECA4y0TDBDvboo3FtydRorjvD5y4=rUvScK8mW64YuJe4N_TWOEqUt3oKYlwv237kQTYPw6A=>. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://
Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment?
Dan, I considered the new 1810 (like the 702W), but mainly for existing residential halls where the cost to run conduit/cabling is prohibitive. That said, I’ve really come to appreciate the unique benefits of Cisco’s CleanAir technology (24/7 RF tech in a AP) so it’s kept me from using them. Jeff From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> on behalf of Daniel Brisson <dbris...@uvm.edu<mailto:dbris...@uvm.edu>> Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 11:46 AM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? Yes, the flexible radio design is definitely interesting. I’m interested to see how it plays out in terms of shuffling clients between APs based on what radio is available. I wanted to ask…have you considered the 702W for your res halls? It really seems to be the way to go in terms of creating small cells for the myriad devices that existing in that setting. We have a new dorm going up as well and with our experience with the 3502i’s, which grants has not been bad, but I really see the benefit of going with the 702w style. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:27 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? For the Cisco shops: I recently had a briefing on the new Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs coming in May, and I’m pretty excited for the new flexible radio design. For those that have not read up on it, in the new models one of the two radios can dynamically move (self optimize) between 2.4 and 5 GHz depending on need (coverage/performance) or function (Serve clients, security monitoring, service assurance aka be a client, or enhanced location). Seems like Cisco is addressing one of my long standing concerns/wishes, that when designing dense deployments, that the number of 2.4 GHz radios become overkill and wasted. The new model provides for much better 5 GHz coverage (lots of WAPs running 5GHz x 2) with just enough running 2.4 GHz to handle legacy needs. It’s going to make my life much easier when designing for our residential halls. Any of the other Cisco shops excited for the new flexible radio feature? Thoughts? I have a new residence hall coming online in August so the timing is great. Jeff ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment?
Not with Cisco, but I love my AP7502's <https://www.zebra.com/us/en/products/networks/wireless-lan/wlan-products/access-points/ap-7502/ap-7502-spec-sheet.html>. The radios in that device are not programmable, but they are in their big brother AP7522, where I could have both radios in the device running 5Ghz or set one as a client for health checks. The Zebra (formerly Motorola) controller won't do this dynamically, though... at least not yet. Joel Coehoorn Director of Information Technology 402.363.5603 *jcoeho...@york.edu <jcoeho...@york.edu>* The mission of York College is to transform lives through Christ-centered education and to equip students for lifelong service to God, family, and society On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mike Atkins <matk...@nd.edu> wrote: > I’m looking forward to the 2800/3800 AP features as we deploy new > infrastructure and high density WiFi. I hopeful the external antenna model > can help reduce the # of APs/licenses needed in very high density > locations. The auto channel width could be nice if it works okay in our > environment. Only time and testing will tell….. Not sure if multi-gig > will be a factor in the coming year but we are certainly looking at it for > the new Cisco and new Aruba APs. Our Aruba folks indicate two 5.2 GHz > radios in the same antenna location will not work efficiently…. So we’re > hoping there is some software magic to overcome physics. Needless to say > I’m trying to keep my expectations low in order to be pleasantly > surprised. > > > > There are a couple “No Strings Attached Show” podcasts discussing > 2800/3800 and flexible radio assignment. (sponsored podcast) There is > also a “Cisco Champion Radio” podcast discussing 2800/3800 features. > > > > PS. We are looking at 1810w for dorm deployment. It’s wave2 AC but still > does not do clean air if you need that. > > > > > > > > *Mike Atkins * > > Network Engineer > > Office of Information Technology > > University of Notre Dame > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: > WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Brisson > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:46 PM > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts > on new flexible radio assignment? > > > > Yes, the flexible radio design is definitely interesting. I’m interested > to see how it plays out in terms of shuffling clients between APs based on > what radio is available. > > > > I wanted to ask…have you considered the 702W for your res halls? It > really seems to be the way to go in terms of creating small cells for the > myriad devices that existing in that setting. We have a new dorm going up > as well and with our experience with the 3502i’s, which grants has not been > bad, but I really see the benefit of going with the 702w style. > > > > -dan > > > > > > > > Dan Brisson > > Network Engineer > > University of Vermont > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [ > mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey D. Sessler > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:27 PM > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on > new flexible radio assignment? > > > > For the Cisco shops: > > > > I recently had a briefing on the new Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs coming in > May, and I’m pretty excited for the new flexible radio design. For those > that have not read up on it, in the new models one of the two radios can > dynamically move (self optimize) between 2.4 and 5 GHz depending on need > (coverage/performance) or function (Serve clients, security monitoring, > service assurance aka be a client, or enhanced location). > > > > Seems like Cisco is addressing one of my long standing concerns/wishes, > that when designing dense deployments, that the number of 2.4 GHz radios > become overkill and wasted. The new model provides for much better 5 GHz > coverage (lots of WAPs running 5GHz x 2) with just enough running 2.4 GHz > to handle legacy needs. It’s going to make my life much easier when > designing for our residential halls. > > > > Any of the other Cisco shops excited for the new flexible radio feature? > Thoughts? I have a new residence hall coming online in August so the timing > is great. > > > > Jeff > > > > > > ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educa
Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment?
Cisco also coming out with AC in a 702W format... http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/aironet-1810w-series-access-points/datasheet-c78-736869.html [http://www.cisco.com/web/fw/i/logo-open-graph.gif]<http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/aironet-1810w-series-access-points/datasheet-c78-736869.html> Cisco Aironet 1810W Series Access Points Data Sheet<http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/aironet-1810w-series-access-points/datasheet-c78-736869.html> www.cisco.com Cisco Aironet 1810W Series Access Points bring a full slate of Cisco high-performance functionality to multi-dwelling-unit deployments. Randy Ethridge Network Engineer V Eastern Illinois University rlethri...@eiu.edu Office Ph. 217-581-7640 Proud to say "I am EIU" From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Daniel Brisson <dbris...@uvm.edu> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:46 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? Yes, the flexible radio design is definitely interesting. I'm interested to see how it plays out in terms of shuffling clients between APs based on what radio is available. I wanted to ask...have you considered the 702W for your res halls? It really seems to be the way to go in terms of creating small cells for the myriad devices that existing in that setting. We have a new dorm going up as well and with our experience with the 3502i's, which grants has not been bad, but I really see the benefit of going with the 702w style. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:27 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? For the Cisco shops: I recently had a briefing on the new Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs coming in May, and I'm pretty excited for the new flexible radio design. For those that have not read up on it, in the new models one of the two radios can dynamically move (self optimize) between 2.4 and 5 GHz depending on need (coverage/performance) or function (Serve clients, security monitoring, service assurance aka be a client, or enhanced location). Seems like Cisco is addressing one of my long standing concerns/wishes, that when designing dense deployments, that the number of 2.4 GHz radios become overkill and wasted. The new model provides for much better 5 GHz coverage (lots of WAPs running 5GHz x 2) with just enough running 2.4 GHz to handle legacy needs. It's going to make my life much easier when designing for our residential halls. Any of the other Cisco shops excited for the new flexible radio feature? Thoughts? I have a new residence hall coming online in August so the timing is great. Jeff ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment?
I’m looking forward to the 2800/3800 AP features as we deploy new infrastructure and high density WiFi. I hopeful the external antenna model can help reduce the # of APs/licenses needed in very high density locations. The auto channel width could be nice if it works okay in our environment. Only time and testing will tell….. Not sure if multi-gig will be a factor in the coming year but we are certainly looking at it for the new Cisco and new Aruba APs. Our Aruba folks indicate two 5.2 GHz radios in the same antenna location will not work efficiently…. So we’re hoping there is some software magic to overcome physics. Needless to say I’m trying to keep my expectations low in order to be pleasantly surprised. There are a couple “No Strings Attached Show” podcasts discussing 2800/3800 and flexible radio assignment. (sponsored podcast) There is also a “Cisco Champion Radio” podcast discussing 2800/3800 features. PS. We are looking at 1810w for dorm deployment. It’s wave2 AC but still does not do clean air if you need that. *Mike Atkins * Network Engineer Office of Information Technology University of Notre Dame *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Brisson *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:46 PM *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? Yes, the flexible radio design is definitely interesting. I’m interested to see how it plays out in terms of shuffling clients between APs based on what radio is available. I wanted to ask…have you considered the 702W for your res halls? It really seems to be the way to go in terms of creating small cells for the myriad devices that existing in that setting. We have a new dorm going up as well and with our experience with the 3502i’s, which grants has not been bad, but I really see the benefit of going with the 702w style. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [ mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey D. Sessler *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:27 PM *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? For the Cisco shops: I recently had a briefing on the new Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs coming in May, and I’m pretty excited for the new flexible radio design. For those that have not read up on it, in the new models one of the two radios can dynamically move (self optimize) between 2.4 and 5 GHz depending on need (coverage/performance) or function (Serve clients, security monitoring, service assurance aka be a client, or enhanced location). Seems like Cisco is addressing one of my long standing concerns/wishes, that when designing dense deployments, that the number of 2.4 GHz radios become overkill and wasted. The new model provides for much better 5 GHz coverage (lots of WAPs running 5GHz x 2) with just enough running 2.4 GHz to handle legacy needs. It’s going to make my life much easier when designing for our residential halls. Any of the other Cisco shops excited for the new flexible radio feature? Thoughts? I have a new residence hall coming online in August so the timing is great. Jeff ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment?
Yes, the flexible radio design is definitely interesting. I’m interested to see how it plays out in terms of shuffling clients between APs based on what radio is available. I wanted to ask…have you considered the 702W for your res halls? It really seems to be the way to go in terms of creating small cells for the myriad devices that existing in that setting. We have a new dorm going up as well and with our experience with the 3502i’s, which grants has not been bad, but I really see the benefit of going with the 702w style. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Sessler Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:27 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] New Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs - thoughts on new flexible radio assignment? For the Cisco shops: I recently had a briefing on the new Cisco 2800/3800 Wave 2 WAPs coming in May, and I’m pretty excited for the new flexible radio design. For those that have not read up on it, in the new models one of the two radios can dynamically move (self optimize) between 2.4 and 5 GHz depending on need (coverage/performance) or function (Serve clients, security monitoring, service assurance aka be a client, or enhanced location). Seems like Cisco is addressing one of my long standing concerns/wishes, that when designing dense deployments, that the number of 2.4 GHz radios become overkill and wasted. The new model provides for much better 5 GHz coverage (lots of WAPs running 5GHz x 2) with just enough running 2.4 GHz to handle legacy needs. It’s going to make my life much easier when designing for our residential halls. Any of the other Cisco shops excited for the new flexible radio feature? Thoughts? I have a new residence hall coming online in August so the timing is great. Jeff ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
