@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's
We are a Cisco shop that uses the Airwave AMPs for management. We let the AMPs
contain the rogues. It works reasonably well and certainly beats trying to it
do it manually on the controllers. Right now we are seeing 2,279 rogues on our
campus
-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Watters, John
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:50 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's
We are a Cisco shop that uses the Airwave AMPs for management. We let the AMPs
contain the rogues. It works reasonably well and certainly b
:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Watters, John
*Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 9:50 AM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's
We are a Cisco shop that uses the Airwave AMPs for management. We let the
AMPs contain the rogues. It works
We used to... but we now don't spend much time trying to mitigate rogue APs
on our network.
Many wireless devices now come out of the box broadcasting their own SSID.
Some Rokus even disallow the turning off of their SSIDs - the only way to
get them to stop is to physically disconnect the radio.
We are a Cisco shop that uses the Airwave AMPs for management. We let the AMPs
contain the rogues. It works reasonably well and certainly beats trying to it
do it manually on the controllers. Right now we are seeing 2,279 rogues on our
campus with the biggest category being HP printers.
We do
We too have the policy of no rogues, but I admit I don't go looking
for them. I know we have them, probably a lot more than I know of,
but as long as they aren't causing problems, I don't really care.
Worst things I've seen are mis-configured APs that want to be a DHCP
server and try
315 443-3003
From: M. Sjulstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's
We too have the policy of no rogues, but I admit I don't go looking for
them. I know we have them
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's
With wireless rolling out on a much larger scale on our campus, we are
revising our policy and attitude to be a bit more restrictive in both
philosophy and practice when it comes to UNCOORDINATED rogues. We are also
taking a stab at coordinating
, April 12, 2007 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's
Will you be using the Containment option in the WCS? Or hunting down the
units and removing them from the Network. Could someone point out some
of the pro's and con's to using containment
Comments in-line.
Frank
_
From: Emerson Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's
Rogue containment does have some drawbacks in performance under certain
scenarios..
Rogue scanning
On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
FB Bridge APs, as mentioned earlier, can be nearly invisible.
Fortunately, they aren't very popular in retail stores.
It's usually easy to use the NAT-box/AP combos as a Bridge AP. If
students understand how they work and don't simply
11 matches
Mail list logo
