: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] on behalf of Jeff Kell [jeff-k...@utc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 6:47 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] requests for open, unauthenticated, no portal WiFi
We use essentially
The CALEA law.
Sincerely,
Sharon Luciw
On May 15, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
Has anyone had to deal with administration requests for completely
open, unauthenticated WiFi with no captive port auth for guest access
to use during events or generally? What arguments
I'm using a simple ACL to restrict traffic. For VPN access we are allowing SSL
and some well know ports used by many VPNs. My supervisor said he got the list
from somewhere on Educause, though I never saw the actual documentation.
--
Heath Barnhart
ITS Network Administrator
Washburn University
We use essentially the eduroam services guidelines
(https://www.eduroam.us/node/69) but we have bandwidth restrictions on
guest WiFi that are not applied to actual eduroam traffic.
Jeff
On 5/20/2014 1:31 PM, Heath Barnhart wrote:
I'm using a simple ACL to restrict traffic. For VPN access we are
There are certain laws you might fall under if you allow open access, such as
CALEA. We recently put in an open/unauthenticated network, but with
restrictions. Visitors must still register there devices (thought there is no
validation), we only allow for 3 days of access followed by a 3 day
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:30:30AM +, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
What is also interesting is that the CALEA recommendations really seem to
focus on giving Law enforcement access, and not necessarily identifying users
in the past. I do wonder why we in .edu's seem to obsess about identifying
Of Chuck Anderson
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 8:19 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] requests for open, unauthenticated, no portal WiFi
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:30:30AM +, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
What is also interesting is that the CALEA recommendations
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] requests for open, unauthenticated, no portal WiFi
Depending on how someone reads the definition of a telecommunications
carrier, the Celea (Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act) of 1994
may come into play. It may be a good point for your argument.
On Thu
Chuck, we're in the exact same situation as you and not only do we use the
argument about being the ISP for free public wifi, We use the law enforcement
argument and CALEA where we need to know who's on our campus network in case we
need to track that down for what they're doing once connected
, May 15, 2014 10:38 AM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] requests for open, unauthenticated, no portal WiFi
Depending on how someone reads the definition of a telecommunications
carrier, the Celea (Communications Assistance
This in an interesting topic. It seems to be all over the map.
If the coffee shop can provide open access, then what is the argument
against a University having an SSID coffee-shop that is back ended
to a standard cable modem? Yes, the argument against having an open
SSID on your main EDU
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jonn Martell
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 8:38 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] requests for open, unauthenticated, no portal WiFi
This in an interesting topic. It seems to be all over the map.
If the coffee
12 matches
Mail list logo
