Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-03-14 Thread Travis Kershner 
Joel,

Honestly, we have not monitored latency or jitter for that bridge.  We have
not received any complaints from clients or from athletics who use it to
live stream games.

-Travis


-- 
Travis A. Kershner
Network Analyst
State University of NY College at Geneseo
1 College Circle, 119 South Hall
Geneseo, NY 14454
V: 585-245-6188
F: 585-245-5579


On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Spaans, Joel H <joel.spa...@usd.edu> wrote:

> Sorry, meant to say Travis @ SUNY
>
>
>
> *From:* Spaans, Joel H
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2018 4:24 PM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> Hi Brian,
>
>
>
> Curious as to what kind of latency and jitter you’re seeing on these
> links, if you’re monitoring those parameters.
>
>
>
> Feel free to respond off list if you’d like.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Joel Spaans*
>
> *Communications Network Analyst – Information Technology Services*
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image001.png@01CD68B6.FC6CD5A0]
>
> *The University of South Dakota* <http://www.usd.edu/> | *Information
> Technology Services*
>
> 414 E. Clark Street
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=414+E.+Clark+Street=gmail=g>,
> Slagle Hall – 14, Vermillion, SD 57069
>
> 605.658.6000 <(605)%20658-6000> (office) | joel.spa...@usd.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
> mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] *On Behalf Of *Travis Kershner
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 11:38 AM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> Brian,
>
>
>
> You will not be disappointed with the NanoBeamAC units.  At Geneseo, we
> did exactly this to provide service to our Softball Field.  Athletics setup
> two camera's to live stream games and at most 25-30 clients will be
> attached to the Cisco AP on the remote side of the bridge.  We are spanning
> just under 1000 feet.  Very happy with this setup.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ​
>
>
> --
>
> Travis A. Kershner
>
> Network Analyst
>
> State University of NY College at Geneseo
>
> 1 College Circle
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1+College+Circle=gmail=g>, 119
> South Hall
>
> Geneseo, NY 14454
>
> V: 585-245-6188 <(585)%20245-6188>
>
> F: 585-245-5579 <(585)%20245-5579>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Brian Helman <bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> wrote:
>
> This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation
> from the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small
> backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for
> example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people
> attending events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a
> point-to-point backhaul into your site planning?
>
>
>
> Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?
>
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> 
> *Brian Helman, M.Ed *|*  Director, ITS/Networking Services | *(: *978.542.7272
> <(978)%20542-7272>*
>
> *Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 01970
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=352+Lafayette+St.,+Salem+Massachusetts+01970=gmail=g>*
>
> *GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779*
>
>
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss.
>
>
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss.
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss.
>
>

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-03-13 Thread Spaans, Joel H 
Sorry, meant to say Travis @ SUNY

From: Spaans, Joel H
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 4:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Hi Brian,

Curious as to what kind of latency and jitter you’re seeing on these links, if 
you’re monitoring those parameters.

Feel free to respond off list if you’d like.

Thanks,


Joel Spaans
Communications Network Analyst – Information Technology Services

[cid:image001.png@01CD68B6.FC6CD5A0]

The University of South Dakota<http://www.usd.edu/> | Information Technology 
Services
414 E. Clark Street, Slagle Hall – 14, Vermillion, SD 57069
605.658.6000 (office) | joel.spa...@usd.edu<mailto:joel.spa...@usd.edu>







From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Travis Kershner
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 11:38 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Brian,

You will not be disappointed with the NanoBeamAC units.  At Geneseo, we did 
exactly this to provide service to our Softball Field.  Athletics setup two 
camera's to live stream games and at most 25-30 clients will be attached to the 
Cisco AP on the remote side of the bridge.  We are spanning just under 1000 
feet.  Very happy with this setup.



[cid:image002.png@01D3BAE7.DE406450]
[cid:image003.png@01D3BAE7.DE406450]
​

--
Travis A. Kershner
Network Analyst
State University of NY College at Geneseo
1 College Circle, 119 South Hall
Geneseo, NY 14454
V: 585-245-6188
F: 585-245-5579


On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu<mailto:bhel...@salemstate.edu>> wrote:
This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation from 
the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small 
backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for 
example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people attending 
events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a point-to-point backhaul 
into your site planning?

Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?

-Brian


Brian Helman, M.Ed |  Director, ITS/Networking Services | •: 
978.542.7272<tel:(978)%20542-7272>
Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 
01970<https://maps.google.com/?q=352+Lafayette+St.,+Salem+Massachusetts+01970=gmail=g>
GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-03-13 Thread Spaans, Joel H 
Hi Brian,

Curious as to what kind of latency and jitter you’re seeing on these links, if 
you’re monitoring those parameters.

Feel free to respond off list if you’d like.

Thanks,


Joel Spaans
Communications Network Analyst – Information Technology Services

[cid:image001.png@01CD68B6.FC6CD5A0]

The University of South Dakota<http://www.usd.edu/> | Information Technology 
Services
414 E. Clark Street, Slagle Hall – 14, Vermillion, SD 57069
605.658.6000 (office) | joel.spa...@usd.edu<mailto:joel.spa...@usd.edu>






From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Travis Kershner
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 11:38 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Brian,

You will not be disappointed with the NanoBeamAC units.  At Geneseo, we did 
exactly this to provide service to our Softball Field.  Athletics setup two 
camera's to live stream games and at most 25-30 clients will be attached to the 
Cisco AP on the remote side of the bridge.  We are spanning just under 1000 
feet.  Very happy with this setup.



[cid:image002.png@01D3BAE7.B36133E0]
[cid:image003.png@01D3BAE7.B36133E0]
​

--
Travis A. Kershner
Network Analyst
State University of NY College at Geneseo
1 College Circle, 119 South Hall
Geneseo, NY 14454
V: 585-245-6188
F: 585-245-5579


On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu<mailto:bhel...@salemstate.edu>> wrote:
This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation from 
the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small 
backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for 
example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people attending 
events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a point-to-point backhaul 
into your site planning?

Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?

-Brian


Brian Helman, M.Ed |  Director, ITS/Networking Services | •: 
978.542.7272<tel:(978)%20542-7272>
Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 
01970<https://maps.google.com/?q=352+Lafayette+St.,+Salem+Massachusetts+01970=gmail=g>
GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-21 Thread Paul K Reimer 
I’ve had good experiences with the Ubiquiti Litebeam line. They would be a 
little more gaudy and susceptible to wind than the Nanobeam units.

-Paul Reimer

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Ackerman
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:39 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

We use the NanoBeam products for a few different applications (surveillance 
cameras in remote lots, extending campus network to temporary student housing, 
etc) and have had very good luck with them.

-Scott

Scott Ackerman
Information Technology
Michigan Tech University

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:27 PM, John Rodkey 
<rod...@westmont.edu<mailto:rod...@westmont.edu>> wrote:
+1 for Ubiquiti

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu<mailto:bhel...@salemstate.edu>> wrote:
Well, it looks like we’re going with the NanoBeamAC units.  I just walked out 
to the field to look at the areas and  …. our security contractor already 
installed them.  One of which is directly behind home plate .. 20’ back; 20’ 
up; unprotected.  Any guesses on how it will react to a foul ball?

I agree with the comment about avoiding 2.4GHz.  I’m trying to get unit 
information on these things.  It appears, from the cutsheets, that there are 
either 2 models or that they support both 2.4 and 5Ghz (not clear to me).

-Brian

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>]
 On Behalf Of Peter Redhead
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 2:57 PM

To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Thanks !

Peter

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Erik Stagg 
<0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu>>
 wrote:
It worked well for us.  We had someone on either roof and adjusted accordingly. 
We already had an existing length, so we were able to determine the coordinates 
fairly easily. We tweaked them until the dB loss was 1dB or less.


-Erik

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
on behalf of Peter Redhead 
<redhe...@newschool.edu<mailto:redhe...@newschool.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 2:28 PM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Hi Erik, did you have difficulty aligning the airFiber Radios?
Peter

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Erik Stagg 
<0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu>>
 wrote:
When I did IT for a TV station, we used these for our TSL and STL (Transmitter 
Station Link, Station Transmitter Link) backups. Worked great for VoIP and 
video. Transmitter had direct line of sight and about 5 miles away.

https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ubnt.com%2Fairfiber%2Fairfiber5%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C49b3098a8df74a60bcdf08d5789c4186%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547534875565830=O3gpv6cNNzoDjQHIi9wo9V%2Bfj4SX7vOVIZ66iN4jv4Q%3D=0>

-Erik

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
on behalf of Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu<mailto:bhel...@salemstate.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 1:13 PM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

I should add, I have fiber to the pressbox.  The point-to-point is to pick up 
cameras that will be remote to the pressbox.  How narrow are the “beams” for 
these backhauls?  We supply WiFi to the stands.

-Brian

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>]
 On Behalf Of Brad Weldon
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:44 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LA

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Scott Ackerman 
We use the NanoBeam products for a few different applications (surveillance
cameras in remote lots, extending campus network to temporary student
housing, etc) and have had very good luck with them.

-Scott

Scott Ackerman
Information Technology
Michigan Tech University

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:27 PM, John Rodkey <rod...@westmont.edu> wrote:

> +1 for Ubiquiti
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Brian Helman <bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Well, it looks like we’re going with the NanoBeamAC units.  I just walked
>> out to the field to look at the areas and  …. our security contractor
>> already installed them.  One of which is directly behind home plate .. 20’
>> back; 20’ up; unprotected.  Any guesses on how it will react to a foul ball?
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with the comment about avoiding 2.4GHz.  I’m trying to get unit
>> information on these things.  It appears, from the cutsheets, that there
>> are either 2 models or that they support both 2.4 and 5Ghz (not clear to
>> me).
>>
>>
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
>> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Peter Redhead
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 2:57 PM
>>
>> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Erik Stagg <
>> 0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:
>>
>> It worked well for us.  We had someone on either roof and adjusted
>> accordingly. We already had an existing length, so we were able to
>> determine the coordinates fairly easily. We tweaked them until the dB loss
>> was 1dB or less.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Erik
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
>> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Peter Redhead <
>> redhe...@newschool.edu>
>> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
>> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 2:28 PM
>> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUS
>> E.EDU>
>> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Erik, did you have difficulty aligning the airFiber Radios?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Erik Stagg <
>> 0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:
>>
>> When I did IT for a TV station, we used these for our TSL and STL
>> (Transmitter Station Link, Station Transmitter Link) backups. Worked great
>> for VoIP and video. Transmitter had direct line of sight and about 5 miles
>> away.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ubnt.com%2Fairfiber%2Fairfiber5%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C49b3098a8df74a60bcdf08d5789c4186%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547534875565830=O3gpv6cNNzoDjQHIi9wo9V%2Bfj4SX7vOVIZ66iN4jv4Q%3D=0>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Erik
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
>> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <
>> bhel...@salemstate.edu>
>> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
>> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 1:13 PM
>> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUS
>> E.EDU>
>> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>>
>>
>>
>> I should add, I have fiber to the pressbox.  The point-to-point is to
>> pick up cameras that will be remote to the pressbox.  How narrow are the
>> “beams” for these backhauls?  We supply WiFi to the stands.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
>> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Brad Weldon
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:44 PM
>> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>>
>>
>>
>> Ubiquiti Nanobeam AC on 5ghz. One of the few times cheap, fast (enough),
>> and

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread John Rodkey 
+1 for Ubiquiti

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Brian Helman <bhel...@salemstate.edu>
wrote:

> Well, it looks like we’re going with the NanoBeamAC units.  I just walked
> out to the field to look at the areas and  …. our security contractor
> already installed them.  One of which is directly behind home plate .. 20’
> back; 20’ up; unprotected.  Any guesses on how it will react to a foul ball?
>
>
>
> I agree with the comment about avoiding 2.4GHz.  I’m trying to get unit
> information on these things.  It appears, from the cutsheets, that there
> are either 2 models or that they support both 2.4 and 5Ghz (not clear to
> me).
>
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Peter Redhead
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 2:57 PM
>
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Erik Stagg <0048e3741c5a-dmarc-
> requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:
>
> It worked well for us.  We had someone on either roof and adjusted
> accordingly. We already had an existing length, so we were able to
> determine the coordinates fairly easily. We tweaked them until the dB loss
> was 1dB or less.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Erik
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Peter Redhead <
> redhe...@newschool.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 2:28 PM
> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> Hi Erik, did you have difficulty aligning the airFiber Radios?
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Erik Stagg <0048e3741c5a-dmarc-
> requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:
>
> When I did IT for a TV station, we used these for our TSL and STL
> (Transmitter Station Link, Station Transmitter Link) backups. Worked great
> for VoIP and video. Transmitter had direct line of sight and about 5 miles
> away.
>
>
>
> https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ubnt.com%2Fairfiber%2Fairfiber5%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C49b3098a8df74a60bcdf08d5789c4186%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547534875565830=O3gpv6cNNzoDjQHIi9wo9V%2Bfj4SX7vOVIZ66iN4jv4Q%3D=0>
>
>
>
> -Erik
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <
> bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 1:13 PM
> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> I should add, I have fiber to the pressbox.  The point-to-point is to pick
> up cameras that will be remote to the pressbox.  How narrow are the “beams”
> for these backhauls?  We supply WiFi to the stands.
>
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Brad Weldon
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:44 PM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> Ubiquiti Nanobeam AC on 5ghz. One of the few times cheap, fast (enough),
> and good (works) have come together for me. We’ve used them for temporary
> backhaul during construction and to reach across the street.
>
> Brad
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Joseph Bernard <j...@clemson.edu> wrote:
>
> Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost
> all of our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world
> jumping on the channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and
> works.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joseph B.
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <
> bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Peter Redhead 
Thanks !

Peter

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Erik Stagg <
0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:

> It worked well for us.  We had someone on either roof and adjusted
> accordingly. We already had an existing length, so we were able to
> determine the coordinates fairly easily. We tweaked them until the dB loss
> was 1dB or less.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Erik
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Peter Redhead <
> redhe...@newschool.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 2:28 PM
> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> Hi Erik, did you have difficulty aligning the airFiber Radios?
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Erik Stagg <0048e3741c5a-dmarc-
> requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:
>
> When I did IT for a TV station, we used these for our TSL and STL
> (Transmitter Station Link, Station Transmitter Link) backups. Worked great
> for VoIP and video. Transmitter had direct line of sight and about 5 miles
> away.
>
>
>
> https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/
>
>
>
> -Erik
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <
> bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 1:13 PM
> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> I should add, I have fiber to the pressbox.  The point-to-point is to pick
> up cameras that will be remote to the pressbox.  How narrow are the “beams”
> for these backhauls?  We supply WiFi to the stands.
>
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Brad Weldon
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:44 PM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> Ubiquiti Nanobeam AC on 5ghz. One of the few times cheap, fast (enough),
> and good (works) have come together for me. We’ve used them for temporary
> backhaul during construction and to reach across the street.
>
> Brad
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Joseph Bernard <j...@clemson.edu> wrote:
>
> Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost
> all of our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world
> jumping on the channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and
> works.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joseph B.
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <
> bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *[WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation
> from the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small
> backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for
> example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people
> attending events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a
> point-to-point backhaul into your site planning?
>
>
>
> Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?
>
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> 
> *Brian Helman, M.Ed *|*  Director, ITS/Networking Services | *(:
> *978.542.7272*
>
> *Salem State University, **352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 01970*
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=352+Lafayette+St.,+Salem+Massachusetts+01970=gmail=g>
>
> *GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779*
>
>
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss
> <https://na01.safelinks.protecti

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Erik Stagg 
It worked well for us.  We had someone on either roof and adjusted accordingly. 
We already had an existing length, so we were able to determine the coordinates 
fairly easily. We tweaked them until the dB loss was 1dB or less.


-Erik

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Peter Redhead 
<redhe...@newschool.edu>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 2:28 PM
To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Hi Erik, did you have difficulty aligning the airFiber Radios?
Peter

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Erik Stagg 
<0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu>>
 wrote:
When I did IT for a TV station, we used these for our TSL and STL (Transmitter 
Station Link, Station Transmitter Link) backups. Worked great for VoIP and 
video. Transmitter had direct line of sight and about 5 miles away.

https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/

-Erik

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
on behalf of Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu<mailto:bhel...@salemstate.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 1:13 PM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

I should add, I have fiber to the pressbox.  The point-to-point is to pick up 
cameras that will be remote to the pressbox.  How narrow are the “beams” for 
these backhauls?  We supply WiFi to the stands.

-Brian

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>]
 On Behalf Of Brad Weldon
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:44 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Ubiquiti Nanobeam AC on 5ghz. One of the few times cheap, fast (enough), and 
good (works) have come together for me. We’ve used them for temporary backhaul 
during construction and to reach across the street.
Brad



On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Joseph Bernard 
<j...@clemson.edu<mailto:j...@clemson.edu>> wrote:
Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost all of 
our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world jumping on the 
channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and works.

Thanks,
Joseph B.

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
on behalf of Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu<mailto:bhel...@salemstate.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation from 
the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small 
backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for 
example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people attending 
events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a point-to-point backhaul 
into your site planning?

Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?

-Brian


Brian Helman, M.Ed |  Director, ITS/Networking Services | •: 978.542.7272
Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 
01970<https://maps.google.com/?q=352+Lafayette+St.,+Salem+Massachusetts+01970=gmail=g>
GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.educause.edu_discuss%26d%3DDwMFAg%26c%3DNgd-ta5yRYsqeUsEDgxhcqsYYY1Xs5ogLxWPA_2Wlc4%26r%3D4Pt1z80PQIvvfw2j1-oSIA%26m%3DOCXDBeesl0ZNE_6JxS07q

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Peter Redhead 
Hi Erik, did you have difficulty aligning the airFiber Radios?
Peter

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Erik Stagg <
0048e3741c5a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:

> When I did IT for a TV station, we used these for our TSL and STL
> (Transmitter Station Link, Station Transmitter Link) backups. Worked great
> for VoIP and video. Transmitter had direct line of sight and about 5 miles
> away.
>
>
>
> https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/
>
>
>
> -Erik
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <
> bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 1:13 PM
> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> I should add, I have fiber to the pressbox.  The point-to-point is to pick
> up cameras that will be remote to the pressbox.  How narrow are the “beams”
> for these backhauls?  We supply WiFi to the stands.
>
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Brad Weldon
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:44 PM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> Ubiquiti Nanobeam AC on 5ghz. One of the few times cheap, fast (enough),
> and good (works) have come together for me. We’ve used them for temporary
> backhaul during construction and to reach across the street.
>
> Brad
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Joseph Bernard <j...@clemson.edu> wrote:
>
> Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost
> all of our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world
> jumping on the channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and
> works.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joseph B.
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <
> bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *[WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation
> from the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small
> backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for
> example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people
> attending events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a
> point-to-point backhaul into your site planning?
>
>
>
> Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?
>
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> 
> *Brian Helman, M.Ed *|*  Director, ITS/Networking Services | *(:
> *978.542.7272*
>
> *Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 01970
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=352+Lafayette+St.,+Salem+Massachusetts+01970=gmail=g>*
>
> *GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779*
>
>
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.educause.edu_discuss%26d%3DDwMFAg%26c%3DNgd-ta5yRYsqeUsEDgxhcqsYYY1Xs5ogLxWPA_2Wlc4%26r%3D4Pt1z80PQIvvfw2j1-oSIA%26m%3DOCXDBeesl0ZNE_6JxS07qQE5HWS-6kShMZLWj_FYOiQ%26s%3DBK-Ika6V6bOSpF3xTSr4Ff_t-SxBCahEwhDd9vp6-FE%26e%3D=02%7C01%7C%7C8337db09e6624ff85ec808d578897e36%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547454289885858=fTCiCK1kOVEV%2BWM%2FdCyqix7xj8%2FqyP%2BCKC9Yr4Lp3iA%3D=0>.
>
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/
> discuss
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fdiscuss=02%7C01%7C%7C8337db09e6624ff85ec808d578897e36%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547454289885858=vWRhdiIxaUw47HMoOWDPprOKKxhazLUw2A4z%2BJyrAb4%3D=0>.
>
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Con

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Erik Stagg 
When I did IT for a TV station, we used these for our TSL and STL (Transmitter 
Station Link, Station Transmitter Link) backups. Worked great for VoIP and 
video. Transmitter had direct line of sight and about 5 miles away.

https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/

-Erik

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 1:13 PM
To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

I should add, I have fiber to the pressbox.  The point-to-point is to pick up 
cameras that will be remote to the pressbox.  How narrow are the “beams” for 
these backhauls?  We supply WiFi to the stands.

-Brian

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Brad Weldon
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:44 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Ubiquiti Nanobeam AC on 5ghz. One of the few times cheap, fast (enough), and 
good (works) have come together for me. We’ve used them for temporary backhaul 
during construction and to reach across the street.
Brad



On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Joseph Bernard 
<j...@clemson.edu<mailto:j...@clemson.edu>> wrote:
Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost all of 
our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world jumping on the 
channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and works.

Thanks,
Joseph B.

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
on behalf of Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu<mailto:bhel...@salemstate.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation from 
the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small 
backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for 
example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people attending 
events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a point-to-point backhaul 
into your site planning?

Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?

-Brian


Brian Helman, M.Ed |  Director, ITS/Networking Services | •: 978.542.7272
Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 01970
GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.educause.edu_discuss%26d%3DDwMFAg%26c%3DNgd-ta5yRYsqeUsEDgxhcqsYYY1Xs5ogLxWPA_2Wlc4%26r%3D4Pt1z80PQIvvfw2j1-oSIA%26m%3DOCXDBeesl0ZNE_6JxS07qQE5HWS-6kShMZLWj_FYOiQ%26s%3DBK-Ika6V6bOSpF3xTSr4Ff_t-SxBCahEwhDd9vp6-FE%26e%3D=02%7C01%7C%7C8337db09e6624ff85ec808d578897e36%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547454289885858=fTCiCK1kOVEV%2BWM%2FdCyqix7xj8%2FqyP%2BCKC9Yr4Lp3iA%3D=0>.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fdiscuss=02%7C01%7C%7C8337db09e6624ff85ec808d578897e36%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547454289885858=vWRhdiIxaUw47HMoOWDPprOKKxhazLUw2A4z%2BJyrAb4%3D=0>.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fdiscuss=02%7C01%7C%7C8337db09e6624ff85ec808d578897e36%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547454289885858=vWRhdiIxaUw47HMoOWDPprOKKxhazLUw2A4z%2BJyrAb4%3D=0>.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Brian Helman 
I should add, I have fiber to the pressbox.  The point-to-point is to pick up 
cameras that will be remote to the pressbox.  How narrow are the “beams” for 
these backhauls?  We supply WiFi to the stands.

-Brian

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Brad Weldon
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:44 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

Ubiquiti Nanobeam AC on 5ghz. One of the few times cheap, fast (enough), and 
good (works) have come together for me. We’ve used them for temporary backhaul 
during construction and to reach across the street.
Brad



On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Joseph Bernard 
<j...@clemson.edu<mailto:j...@clemson.edu>> wrote:
Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost all of 
our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world jumping on the 
channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and works.

Thanks,
Joseph B.

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> 
on behalf of Brian Helman 
<bhel...@salemstate.edu<mailto:bhel...@salemstate.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation from 
the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small 
backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for 
example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people attending 
events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a point-to-point backhaul 
into your site planning?

Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?

-Brian


Brian Helman, M.Ed |  Director, ITS/Networking Services | •: 978.542.7272
Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 01970
GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.educause.edu_discuss%26d%3DDwMFAg%26c%3DNgd-ta5yRYsqeUsEDgxhcqsYYY1Xs5ogLxWPA_2Wlc4%26r%3D4Pt1z80PQIvvfw2j1-oSIA%26m%3DOCXDBeesl0ZNE_6JxS07qQE5HWS-6kShMZLWj_FYOiQ%26s%3DBK-Ika6V6bOSpF3xTSr4Ff_t-SxBCahEwhDd9vp6-FE%26e%3D=02%7C01%7C%7C8337db09e6624ff85ec808d578897e36%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547454289885858=fTCiCK1kOVEV%2BWM%2FdCyqix7xj8%2FqyP%2BCKC9Yr4Lp3iA%3D=0>.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fdiscuss=02%7C01%7C%7C8337db09e6624ff85ec808d578897e36%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547454289885858=vWRhdiIxaUw47HMoOWDPprOKKxhazLUw2A4z%2BJyrAb4%3D=0>.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fdiscuss=02%7C01%7C%7C8337db09e6624ff85ec808d578897e36%7C70d32b73b45749d1950c4f78aeffc21b%7C0%7C0%7C636547454289885858=vWRhdiIxaUw47HMoOWDPprOKKxhazLUw2A4z%2BJyrAb4%3D=0>.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Brad Weldon 
Ubiquiti Nanobeam AC on 5ghz. One of the few times cheap, fast (enough), and 
good (works) have come together for me. We’ve used them for temporary backhaul 
during construction and to reach across the street. 

Brad



> On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Joseph Bernard  wrote:
> 
> Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost all 
> of our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world jumping on 
> the channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and works.
>  
> Thanks,
> Joseph B.
>  
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
>  on behalf of Brian Helman 
> 
> Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
> 
> Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" 
> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>  
> This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation from 
> the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small 
> backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for 
> example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people 
> attending events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a 
> point-to-point backhaul into your site planning?
>  
> Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?
>  
> -Brian
>  
> 
> Brian Helman, M.Ed |  Director, ITS/Networking Services | (: 978.542.7272
> Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 01970
> GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779
>  
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Daniel Wurst 
If you are an Aruba wireless shop, Denison University has had success using
Aruba Mesh for our point to point bridge solution. We have used AP277s,
225s, 175s, and 105s to accomplish various point to point wireless needs
across campus.

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:16 PM Joseph Bernard  wrote:

> Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost
> all of our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world
> jumping on the channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and
> works.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joseph B.
>
>
>
> *From: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <
> bhel...@salemstate.edu>
> *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> *To: *"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
>
>
> *Subject: *[WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls
>
>
>
> This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation
> from the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small
> backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for
> example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people
> attending events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a
> point-to-point backhaul into your site planning?
>
>
>
> Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?
>
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> 
> *Brian Helman, M.Ed *|*  Director, ITS/Networking Services | *(: *978.542.7272
> <(978)%20542-7272>*
>
> *Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 01970
> *
>
> *GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779*
>
>
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/discuss
> .
>
> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
>
> --
Daniel Wurst
Network Engineer
Denison University
wur...@denison.edu
740-587-6229

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

2018-02-20 Thread Joseph Bernard 
Don’t consider anything that uses 2.4GHz on the backhaul.  We have lost all of 
our 2.4GHz links in various places due to the rest of the world jumping on the 
channel during a power blip.  Ubiquiti stuff is cheap and works.

Thanks,
Joseph B.

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 on behalf of Brian Helman 

Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 

Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" 
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] point-to-point wireless backhauls

This has come up a few times, but I wanted to ask introduce a deviation from 
the larger (trunk) discussion – what are people recommending for small 
backhauls over wireless (e.g to support a 1-2 devices, such as CCTV) for 
example at a ball field?  If you are offering WiFi services to people attending 
events, do you need to reconcile the introduction of a point-to-point backhaul 
into your site planning?

Have any of you used the NanoBeamAC units?

-Brian


Brian Helman, M.Ed |  Director, ITS/Networking Services | •: 978.542.7272
Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem Massachusetts 01970
GPS: 42.502129, -70.894779

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.