[WISPA] service in 59532

2005-08-04 Thread 802DSL.COM
Anyone serve this area? Contact me offlist. Thanks Tom Johnson 802DSL.COM -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re[2]: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected to officially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday

2005-08-04 Thread Barry at Mutual Data
Hello Charles, (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems now come w/ WiFi CW access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's a convenience to the CW consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an insidious method of CW trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks) We have a village of about 400 homes that

RE: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected toofficially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday

2005-08-04 Thread Charles Wu
Well..did you (or anyone for the matter) reply to the 3650 NPRM? -Charles --- WISPNOG Park City, UT http://www.wispnog.com August 15-17, 2005 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bo Hamilton Sent:

RE: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected to officially propose DSL deregulationonThursday

2005-08-04 Thread Charles Wu
Title: Message As an FYI - if you're planning on registering for WiNOG, use code WISPA05...you'll save $100 off your registration, and we (WiNOG) will donate $25 to WISPA (for eachregistration that uses that code) P.S. - due to a computer glitch, we've extended the early registration rate

Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected to officially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday

2005-08-04 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
I feel that we are kind of self regulated, where as the big boys, when left unregulated, go crazy. Charles Wu wrote: snip If anyone recalls the argument I had with Charles Wu...about how I would NEVER surrender ownership of every part of my own network, from customer to carrier hotel if there

Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expectedtoofficially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday

2005-08-04 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
I am working with a guy to wholesale my network, and I know Marlon wholesales. Who else, I don't know. If left unregulated, how many of the bells would wholesale? Sure there are some idiots out there who don't know what they are doing, but they won't be around forever. I'd just bet more

Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCCexpected toofficially proposeDSLderegulationonThursday

2005-08-04 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi Put 04-151 in the top left box. After that it's easy. Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I

[WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Fw: [isp-clec] FCC DSL - WBIA ACTION Recommendation

2005-08-04 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Anyone care to comment on this? Should we also jump into this? Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

2005-08-04 Thread George
Blair Davis wrote: Anyone have any compairsons for 5.8GHz vs leaves compaired to 2.4GHz vs leaves in Near or Non LoS conditions? Interested in data about 802.11A systems, non-propriatry... Thanks... There isn't too much non proprietary 5 gig systems out there. Star-OS atheros stuff,

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

2005-08-04 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
http://www.odessaoffice.com/wireless/ Second link on the interesting stuff page. Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!

[WISPA] more grounding related questions

2005-08-04 Thread Dan Metcalf
I am installing some new rb532's w/ shielded cat5, I have a couple of options, using shielded connectors all the way to the rb532 connector itself, this would connect the rb532 ground to the cat5 sheild and tower ground but I'm wondering if I should only ground it at the antenna itself on the

[WISPA] 6 foot 6ghz antenna rule

2005-08-04 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Hi All, For those that don't know, the 6 gig band is licensed ptp only. It's a pretty cheap license and you can get a LOT of throughput for very long distances. For short (less than 50 miles :-) the 6' antenna requirement often kills the deal because of size limits on what towers can

RE: [WISPA] 6 foot 6ghz antenna rule

2005-08-04 Thread Rick Smith
I'm in favor of that How about just requiring tighter beam control on 6ghz stuff ? I'm sure a 2 foot dish could be restricted down to a tighter beam... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 Sent: Thursday,

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Fw: [isp-clec] FCC DSL - WBIA ACTIONRecommendation

2005-08-04 Thread Mac Dearman
Charles, I think that statement is about the most ridiculous ( hilarious) thing I have ever heard you say. I am glad that its in writing! :-) If all the WISPs in the country banded together we wouldn't be a pimple on the ass of a Telco like the Bells. We are so far from even being

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Fw: [isp-clec] FCC DSL -WBIA ACTIONRecommendation

2005-08-04 Thread Tom DeReggi
Well thats not true. They do it every day. Life is not fair and life is not equal. Its all about votes and keeping the majority happy. Even if the ultimate goal was to regul;ate WISPs as well, it could takes years to finally have that happen in the courts, if enough resistence was put forth