Re: [WISPA] RE: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in

2005-10-04 Thread Dawn DiPietro
All, I think it would be a good idea to sell them and any profits should go to help Mac. It may not even be worth it but if there was enough money in selling T-Shirts maybe this would help. Thanks, Dawn Frank Crawford wrote: Brian; You need to contact Rick Harnish as I don't know what

Re: [WISPA] RE: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in

2005-10-04 Thread Bob Moldashel
ROFLOL!! Now THAT'S Funny!!! Mac Dearman wrote: hehehehehe - you got one that will fit a 55 gallon drum with arms and lots of hair? :-) Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. www.inetsouth.com www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts) 318-728-8600 - Rayville

Re: [WISPA] TV Interference

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Reed
Thanks John, and Duh.  The ferrite beads are in the truck, but not in the mind.  Would have been easy. Not an integral antenna, problems started when we changed antenna.  Our antenna is about 15' below the TV antenna, about 5' above where the TV coax enters the house. The radio is an early

Re: [WISPA] RE: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
Hey! I resemble that remark! :-) Scriv Mac Dearman wrote: hehehehehe - you got one that will fit a 55 gallon drum with arms and lots of hair? :-) Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. www.inetsouth.com www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts) 318-728-8600 - Rayville 318-728-9600

[WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard. 04-186 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge opposition from the NAB (National

RE: [WISPA] TV Interference

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Reed
Possibly, but why did it become a problem when I replaced the antenna? Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net -- Original Message --- From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General

Re: [WISPA] TV Interference

2005-10-04 Thread allen
Channels 2 - 6 on TV are below the FM Radio broadcast band. Perhaps an IF of the internet radio is leaking into the TV system - Do they have a mast mounted TV amplifier in the chain? Allen HTML HEAD META content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type META content=Open

Re: [WISPA] TV Interference

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Reed
Not that I saw. Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net -- Original Message --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:32:23 -0500

Re: [WISPA] Mac: icecast, or other broadcast

2005-10-04 Thread Mac Dearman
Tim, Those jumpers rolled in yesterday evening and they look GREAT! Thanks for the electric tape and tie straps as well :-) I told my wife before I opened the box a minute ago that I was gonna be ashamed after I opened that box and she asked why and I stated these are gonna make my usual

Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread George
Funny thing is I filled this one out. I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and my response can not be found. Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing? George

Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread Tony Weasler
Mine was also removed. I think that it was because in my first filing I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it from COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD. The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that you send to the government. Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it

Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread George
Ok something wacky is going on. Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186 George Tony Weasler wrote: Mine was also removed. I think that it was because in my first filing I

Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
WOW! I just checked it out. Guys, we are up to 351 comments right now on 04-186! I bet 95% are from WISPS. You guys rock! We were at 315 this morning. You guys are amazing me here. We might actually get 500 comments on this. If we did I think the FCC would have serious trouble denying us our

[WISPA] [Fwd: Re: [isp-wireless] URGENT: We need 100% participation RIGHT NOW! This means YOU!]

2005-10-04 Thread George
---BeginMessage--- thanks! I ran this item today: http://www.isp-planet.com/fixed_wireless/politics/2005/wispa_fcc_bol.html http://www.isp-planet.com/fixed_wireless/politics/2005/wispa_fcc_bol_p2.html Do feel free to e-mail me directly with any and all WISPA action alerts.

RE: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread Rick Harnish
Jory Privett forwarded John's message to the FISPA list as well. There has been numerous responses today from FISPA. Thanks Jory! Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread Tony Weasler
Maybe their comment retrieval system is broken. I manually edited the link that I sent because when you click on their view all button, it puts the number of records that it is aware of here: start=1end=###records### That effectively limits the query to this number of records. Since I assumed

[WISPA] Earthlink now in the WISP business

2005-10-04 Thread Brian Webster
Well this is they type of thing I feared, the well funded big guys getting in to the WISP business. Earthlink was awarded the contract with Philly to build out their wi-fi network. They have also been one of the companies submitting a plan to San Francisco. Let's just hope they don't

Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
The issue is a caching issue. Dump your cached memory in your browser and all works. Scriv George wrote: Funny thing is I filled this one out. I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and my

Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
Well maybe I am wrong. Now I am only seeing 240 comments. This is after I dumped cache. I am not sure what is wrong here now. Scriv George wrote: Funny thing is I filled this one out. I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we sent this to the various lists and

RE: [WISPA] Earthlink now in the WISP business

2005-10-04 Thread JohnnyO
Title: Message Brian a canopy system can be taken down much easier then a DSSS system - Canopy will suffer just as much from other "un-timed" canopy users in the same area. There are lots of WISPs that are deployed in Canopy clustered areas and are running fine. Just hope they don't

Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread Tony Weasler
I am also seeing only 240 and the two filings that I posted today are missing... in fact, I only see one filing from 10/4 and I know that there were at least 4 there earlier. My filing a few days ago that was missing this morning appears to have re-appeared as well. Something strange is going

[WISPA] FW: [X-FISPA] WISPs respond

2005-10-04 Thread Rick Harnish
FISPA forward http://www.isp-planet.com/fixed_wireless/politics/2005/wispa_fcc_bol_p2.html Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original

[WISPA] WindowsME network issue

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Reed
I have spent 5 hours, no kidding it is 5 hours, trying to setup a customer.  First time on an ME machine.  Put in the network address, 10.y.x.4 and the netmask, 255.255.240.0 and the gateway, 10.y.x.1 and the DNS servers and try to ping the radio on 10.y.x.23.  1 of 100 makes it, with 998mS. 

RE: [WISPA] WindowsME network issue

2005-10-04 Thread Jonathan Schmidt
Scott, ME was 98 with features and more bugs. I've had a family member with ME an intractable network anomoly and finally de-installed the TCP/IP, then de-installed the Ethernet, then rebooted...and it found Ethernet and I re-installed the TCP/IP then I could get it to work. Make

Re: [WISPA] WindowsME network issue

2005-10-04 Thread George
Jonathan Schmidt wrote: Make sure they don't have some sort of firewall installed. This is usually the problem we'll see, sometimes you have to remove and reinstall the firewall in older machines. Can't say I've had to do that with xp machines. George -- WISPA Wireless List:

Re: [WISPA] WindowsME network issue

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Reed
Thanks to both of you.  What I forgot in the first post was that between the first time I was there last week and today, the customer had a local shop try to figure it out.  They completly reloaded the machine.  Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design,

Re: [WISPA] WindowsME network issue

2005-10-04 Thread Scott Reed
Just thought of this.  Would it work if the radio did the DHCP.  This is a Deliberant 2300. Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net -- Original Message --- From: Blair Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]