RE: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype 902-928MHzMini-PCICard

2005-10-23 Thread Paul Hendry
?? I knew Atheros had a 1900MHz chipset but didn't think they had a 900MHz product. Do you know where the details are for this chipset? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith Sent: 22 October 2005 22:25 To: WISPA General List Subject: R

[WISPA] Recent moves give CLECs air assault

2005-10-23 Thread Frank Muto
CLECs see gold in wireless - The wireless field is quickly growing as a potentially lucrative source for CLECs. Many carriers not only are generating revenues from providing backhaul service to wireless companies, but the CLEC industry also hopes to get into wireless broadband. - http://telephonyo

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype 902-928MHzMini-PCICard

2005-10-23 Thread Dylan Oliver
They said it wouldn't be done! Also: Why only 4/2/1 non-overlapping channels? Why not 3? Best,-- Dylan OliverPrimaverity, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Wilma

2005-10-23 Thread George
Rick Smith wrote: Wind sheer in the upper atmosphere over the gulf. That's why it's stalled...soon as it leaves the shoreline of mexico, it's gonna get hacked down to a cat 1 by those easterly winds. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geo

RE: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype 902-928MHzMini-PCICard

2005-10-23 Thread danlist
This is awesome, I knew this was coming, ideally once it works with MT with adjustable channel width (ie: 5mhz or 10mhz) - you should be able to push some serious throughput on that 5mhz channel compared to the existing Trango & Canopy 900mhz systems Hopefully the pricing on the radio is the same

Re: [WISPA] Senao Question

2005-10-23 Thread Pete Davis. NoDial.net
What I have experienced is that 30% or better is usually a solid signal quality. 15% or better is usually a solid signal strength. I have never figured out a "%" to "dbm" translation. The web-only non-snmp interface is my least favorite thing about 2611 CB3 Deluxes. My most favorite thing abou

RE: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype902-928MHzMini-PCICard

2005-10-23 Thread JohnnyO
Hate to say it Dan, BUT - Trango and Atheros get's it's ass kicked by Canopy - Canopy is the ONLY 900mhz Platform that will work for us in a -55 to -60 noise floor situation - so hopefully - you live In the perfect world and can run "noise/interference" free :) JohnnyO -Original Message-

[WISPA] ping

2005-10-23 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
ping -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype902-928MHzMini-PCICard

2005-10-23 Thread Travis Johnson
Hopefully you aren't really installing customers that have a -55 to -60 noise floor. How reliable of a signal can they really have? Travis Microserv JohnnyO wrote: Hate to say it Dan, BUT - Trango and Atheros get's it's ass kicked by Canopy - Canopy is the ONLY 900mhz Platform that will wo

RE: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype902-928MHzMini-PCICard

2005-10-23 Thread JohnnyO
Title: Message Ask Rick Smith ! - we cannot install here unless we have a -52 or better ! DOH !  This gives us a 1/2 mile operating radius with 900mhz ! :)   JohnnyO -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis JohnsonSent: Sunday

RE: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype902-928MHzMini-PCICard

2005-10-23 Thread Rick Smith
Title: Message I just ran across the same thing in NJ near a power plant.   I'm installing customers, but the noise floor's -71 - so that means they need a 59 signal or better.  ouch. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JohnnyOSent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 11:55