RE: [WISPA] A Matter of Professionalism - was: Part-15 bashing

2005-11-22 Thread Victoria Proffer
Charles, Agreed. Victoria -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Wu Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:43 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] A Matter of Professionalism - was: Part-15 bashing Victoria, Please don't take

RE: [WISPA] I am back -- this time with a vengeance! LOL ;-)

2005-11-22 Thread Victoria
It was a compliment. But between menopause and craziness it may have come out a bit odd. Victoria -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA

Re: [WISPA] network testers

2005-11-22 Thread Scott Reed
I also use a BoseLAN BL-100T.  Not as fancy and only checks 4 wires, so not great on POE, but does test jumpers and shows link and data to either a PC or Hub. Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net --

[WISPA] ezlinx.net SPAM

2005-11-22 Thread Reliable Internet, LLC
Do all you guys get this crap from them about once a week? I have asked several times to be removed from their spam list. Did they harvest this list or p-15? Today I responded asking about how they fix these "Transio" they talk about. LOL! Stupid spammers can't even spell what they fix. :) I

RE: [WISPA] ezlinx.net SPAM

2005-11-22 Thread Rick Harnish
I do not see that email address listed in the wireless list membership roll. I dont think he harvested this list. I havent ever gotten one from him that I know of. Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340

Re: [WISPA] ezlinx.net SPAM

2005-11-22 Thread Reliable Internet, LLC
huh. I don't know why they pick on me. :( I just told another company I would spend all day using their email on porn sites (i figure I could get them 1000 spam a day) if they didn't leave me alone. Who knows, it might work. Anyway, thanks. Brian Rick Harnish wrote: