Re: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP

2006-04-15 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
It is not financially feasible for a mainstream WISP, who is attempting to serve all types of internet customers to rely on BA for anything but specialized application., It's just too expensive. North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061 personal correspondence to: mark at neofast dot net

[WISPA] HAM Proposals to FCC for Spread Spectrum

2006-04-15 Thread Eric Rogers
Guys, I received a random e-mail from someone that I don't even know. I thought was a phony e-mail (I will append the text below). I am not one that tries to spread rumors or anything, but I went to the ARRL site, and with a quick search on 2.4, I found this article:

Re: [WISPA] HAM Proposals to FCC for Spread Spectrum

2006-04-15 Thread Dawn DiPietro
Marlon, Can you dig up any information on this? Regards, Dawn DiPietro Eric Rogers wrote: Guys, I received a random e-mail from someone that I don't even know. I thought was a phony e-mail (I will append the text below). I am not one that tries to spread rumors or anything, but I went

Re: [WISPA] Wisp Wireless Internet Google Map DONE!

2006-04-15 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
Sure, take the time to put all your towers. ;) I just did the NOC. One of these days I'll slap another ten plus sites on there. Blair Davis wrote: Now take a look at the one on the southwest corner of Michigan.. Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Now that was easy. Go check out that cool

[WISPA] DAWN ...and Ken....ARRL Requests changes to Part 15 rules for 2.4GHz Systems]

2006-04-15 Thread George
Here is what I got from P15: On March 13, 2006, The ARRL has proposed a change in regulating spread spectrum power output. This will dramatically affect users of 802.11b/g in the 2.4 GHz frequency range. Basically the proposal allows amateur radio operators to run powers of 100 watts without

Re: [WISPA] DAWN ...and Ken....ARRL Requests changes to Part 15 rules for 2.4GHz Systems]

2006-04-15 Thread George
And I should also say that it is being discussed and addressed by on the wispa fcc committee list. George George wrote: Here is what I got from P15: On March 13, 2006, The ARRL has proposed a change in regulating spread spectrum power output. This will dramatically affect users of

Re: [WISPA] DAWN ...and Ken....ARRL Requests changes to Part 15 rules for 2.4GHz Systems]

2006-04-15 Thread Dawn DiPietro
Thanks George. I could not find any information on this. George wrote: Here is what I got from P15: On March 13, 2006, The ARRL has proposed a change in regulating spread spectrum power output. This will dramatically affect users of 802.11b/g in the 2.4 GHz frequency range. Basically the

Re: [WISPA] DAWN ...and Ken....ARRL Requests changes to Part 15 rules for 2.4GHz Systems]

2006-04-15 Thread Forrest W Christian
George wrote: And I should also say that it is being discussed and addressed by on the wispa fcc committee list. I'm working on the first draft of a response from WISPA.. Basically saying that this is a BAD idea, at least in those bands shared with ISM/UNII users. -forrest -- WISPA Wireless

RE: [WISPA] Trango CPEs

2006-04-15 Thread Gino A. Villarini
No, they only work with trango aps Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rabbtux rabbtux Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 6:44 PM To: WISPA

Re: [WISPA] DAWN ...and Ken....ARRL Requests changes to Part 15 rules for 2.4GHz Systems]

2006-04-15 Thread George
Forrest W Christian wrote: George wrote: And I should also say that it is being discussed and addressed by on the wispa fcc committee list. I'm working on the first draft of a response from WISPA.. Basically saying that this is a BAD idea, at least in those bands shared with ISM/UNII

Re: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP

2006-04-15 Thread John Scrivner
I disagree. I weighed the performance specs and price and I feel I will save money with this platform. If you are saying it is more expensive than other platforms then you are right but the performance boost and wider coverage per cell make up for much of the higher cost.. I disagree that