Hi Lonnie, Would be great to see your test results using smaller packet sizes of 100bytes which seems to be around the average packet size for the majority of the traffic on my network. This test always seems to have a massive impact on the available throughput and is currently the reason why we
Tom, I would like to think that Brian is setting the 'proper' expectations from the beginning. Only if I had done so... :-) On 8/11/06 5:30 PM, Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you trying to get divorsed already? :-) I assume honeymoon, means you just got married.
I wish, just feeling warm and fuzzy because the net is working mostly right for a change. -Original Message-From: JohnnyO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 01:25 AMTo: ''WISPA General List''Subject: RE: [WISPA] Welcome Alvarion to WISPA - Our Newest Vendor Member Ron
Well Tom, We are in the same situation as you, testing backhaul replacements. Our Network backhauls are made of : Spectras , Gemini, Trango Atlas, Motorola BH units and Proxim MP11a. So we started looking for a 802.11a based unit, config channels of 5,10,20 and 40 mhz, support for
Our techs hate the non-gel cable Shireen sells, it's a solid metal core with a copper clad. Very rigid to work with... is the gel version the same ? Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL
Title: Message 20 mhz channel: TCP : 35 Mbps UDP: 28 Mbps ( weird, usually is the opposite ) Gino, Keep in mind -- if you check the Atheros "advanced feature" checkbox -- you are turning on "super-a/g" functionality Going back to your testing methodology (which you haven't elaborated
Title: Message Charles: For test we are using the Mikrotik BW test tool client on the PC, and the built in the Router.. I completely understand your point, but why on 40 mhz channel size, its 45 mbps TCP and 72 mbps UDP ? Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless